Opposition by Annco, Inc. to registration of trade mark application number 1874506 (class 25) - AEROLOFT - in the name of Nike Innovate C.V.
Case
•
[2020] ATMO 157
•30 September 2020
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Opposition by Annco, Inc. to registration of trade mark application number 1874506 (class 25) - AEROLOFT - in the name of Nike Innovate C.V. [2020] ATMO 157
[2020] ATMO 157
30 September 2020
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Annco, Inc. (the Opponent) opposed the registration of the trade mark AEROLOFT in class 25, sought by Nike Innovate C.V. (the Applicant). The opposition was heard by M. Cooper.
The Opponent relied on several grounds under the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth), including sections 44, 59, 60, and 42(b). The central legal issue was whether any of these grounds were established, thereby preventing the registration of the AEROLOFT trade mark.
The court found that the Opponent had failed to establish any of the grounds of opposition it had nominated. Consequently, the trade mark AEROLOFT was permitted to proceed to registration, subject to a one-month delay to allow for potential appeals. The Applicant was awarded costs against the Opponent.
The Opponent relied on several grounds under the *Trade Marks Act 1995* (Cth), including sections 44, 59, 60, and 42(b). The central legal issue was whether any of these grounds were established, thereby preventing the registration of the AEROLOFT trade mark.
The court found that the Opponent had failed to establish any of the grounds of opposition it had nominated. Consequently, the trade mark AEROLOFT was permitted to proceed to registration, subject to a one-month delay to allow for potential appeals. The Applicant was awarded costs against the Opponent.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Standing
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Statutory Construction
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Trade mark application number 2135123 (Classes 5, 9, 18, 25, 29, 30) – BLUEY- in the name of Ludo Studio Pty Ltd. [2022] ATMO 27
Cases Citing This Decision
1
Cases Cited
25
Statutory Material Cited
0
Pfizer Products Inc v Karam
[2006] FCA 1663
Food Channel Network Pty Ltd v Television Food Network GP
[2010] FCAFC 58
Registrar of Trade Marks v Woolworths
[1999] FCA 1020