Opinder Singh Sidhu (Migration)

[2023] AATA 2171

Opinder Singh Sidhu (Migration) [2023] AATA 2171 (14 June 2023)

DECISION RECORD

DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division

APPLICANT:  Opinder Singh Sidhu

CASE NUMBER:  1928235

HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S):          BCC2019/3555296

MEMBER:George Hallwood

DATE:14 June 2023

PLACE OF DECISION:  Adelaide

DECISION:The Tribunal affirms the decision under review to refuse the nomination.

Statement made on 14 June 2023 at 12:17pm

CATCHWORDS 
MIGRATION – nomination – Direct Entry stream – applicant failed to demonstrate that the position could not be filled by an Australian citizen or an Australian permanent resident – no advice in relation to this application from a regional certifying body as to whether the position can be filled by an Australian citizen or permanent resident – applicant failed to provide the requested information within the prescribed period– nominator did not provide any updated or current information –decision under review affirmed 

LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, ss 65, 245AR, 359, 360, 363
Migration Regulations 1994, r 5.19

CASES
Hasran v MIAC [2010] FCAFC 40

STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS

APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

1. This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 18 September 2019 to reject the applicant’s application for approval of the nomination of a position under reg 5.19 of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) (the Regulations).

2. The applicant applied for approval on 16 July 2019. The requirements for the approval of the nomination of a position in Australia are found in reg 5.19 of the Regulations, which contains general requirements for approval and additional requirements for approval set out in three alternative streams: a Temporary Residence Transition stream, a Direct Entry stream and a Labour Agreement stream. If the application meets the requirements for approval then the application must be approved: reg 5.19(3)(a). If any of the requirements are not met then the application must be refused: reg 5.19(3)(b).

3. In this case, the applicant has applied for approval of a nomination, seeking to satisfy the criteria in the Direct Entry stream.

4. The delegate refused the application on the basis the applicant’s nomination did not satisfy reg 5.19(12)(c) of the Regulations because they were not satisfied that the applicant had demonstrated that the nominated position cannot be filled by an Australian citizen or permanent resident who is already living locally, or who would move to the area where the nominated position is located.

5. On 7 October 2019 the Tribunal received an Application for Review form from the applicant.  

6. On 13 April 2023 the Tribunal wrote to the applicant pursuant to s359 of the Act, inviting the review applicant to provide updated and current information about the application for review by the applicant in respect of the decision to refuse their application for approval of a nominated position under r. 5.19 of the Regulations. This was sent via email to the address provided by the applicant on their application to the Tribunal dated 7 October 2019. The letter set a timeframe for updated and current information to be provided to the Tribunal together with the consequences of not providing the information on time:

   If you or another person authorised by the applicant cannot provide the information by 27 April 2023, you or another person authorised by the applicant may ask us for an extension of time in which to provide the information. If an extension of time request is made, it must be received by us before 27 April 2023 and it must state the reason why the extension of time is required.

   We will carefully consider any request for an extension of time and will advise whether or not the extension has been granted.

   If we do not receive the information within the period allowed or as extended, we may make a decision on the review without taking any further action to obtain the information. The applicant will also lose any entitlement it might otherwise have had under the Migration Act to appear before us to give evidence and present arguments.

7. The review applicant has not provided the information within the prescribed period and no extension has been requested or granted. In these circumstances, s 359C applies and pursuant to s 360(3) the review applicant is not entitled to appear before the Tribunal. The effect of s 363A of the Act is that if a review applicant has no entitlement to a hearing, the Tribunal has no power to permit him or her to appear: Hasran v MIAC [2010] FCAFC 40. In the absence of any further response from the applicant the Tribunal has decided to proceed to decision without taking further steps to obtain the information.

8. For the following reasons, the Tribunal has decided to affirm the decision under review to refuse the nomination.

   CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE

9. The issue in this case is whether the applicant meets the general requirements for approval of the nomination set out in reg 5.19(4) and the stream specific requirements set out in reg 5.19(9), which are extracted in the attachment to this decision. For the nomination to be approved, all the requirements must be met.

   Tasks correspond to specified occupation – reg 5.19(9)(j)

10. Regulation 5.19(9)(j) provides that the requirements in reg 5.19(10) or reg 5.19(12) must be met. Regulations 5.19(10) and (12) respectively relate to nominations for a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa, and nominations for a Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa. Nominations identifying a Subclass 187 visa can only be made before 16 November 2019. In this case, the nomination relates to a Subclass 187 visa.

11. Regulation 5.19(12) contains a number of requirements including that:

    ·the position is located at a place in regional Australia and the business operated by the nominator is located at that place: reg 5.19(12)(a) and (b).

    ·the position cannot be filled by an Australian citizen or permanent resident who is living in, or would move to, the local area concerned: reg 5.19(12)(c).

    ·the tasks to be performed in the position correspond to the tasks of an occupation specified in a legislative instrument made under reg 5.19(13) and in force at the time the application is made; and the occupation applies to the identified person in accordance with that instrument: reg 5.19(12)(d) and (e).

    ·a specified regional certifying body located in the same State or Territory and with responsibility for the local area in which the position is located has advised the Minister about whether the identified person would be paid at least the annual market salary rate for the occupation, whether there is a genuine need for the identified person to be employed in the position under the direct control of the nominator, and whether the position can be filled by an Australian citizen or permanent resident who is living in, or would move to, the local area concerned: reg 5.19(12)(f).

12. While this is a fresh look at the application, the Tribunal has first considered the criteria on which the nomination application was refused by the delegate. That is, whether the position cannot be filled by an Australian citizen or permanent resident who is living in, or would move to, the local area concerned.

13. The nomination application dated 16 July 2019 contains no information about any attempts to fill the position with an Australian citizen or permanent resident. The only information provided with the nomination application was a position description titled “Restaurant Cook Job Description Template” and a copy of the Australian Business Register ABN Lookup page with registration details of the business entity name: Sidhu, Opinder Singh; and ABN: 59 244 124 181. The nomination application which the applicant lodged on 16 July 2019 provides applicants with an opportunity to provide evidence in support of their application: “Give details as to why the applicant will not be providing attachments prior to lodging this application”; to which the applicant responded: “Will provide later”.

14. The Tribunals invitation to the applicant dated 13 April 2023 under s359 set out, relevantly:

    In order for the nomination of a position to be approved, the Tribunal must be satisfied that all of the relevant criteria in r.5.19 of the Regulations are met at the time of its decision. As the application for nomination was made under the Direct Entry
    nomination stream, the relevant criteria are in rr.5.19(4) and (9) of the Regulations.

    The Tribunal now requires updated and current information addressing these
    criteria. Accordingly, and without limiting the information that may be given, you or
    another person authorised by the applicant are invited to give the following information in writing. We have given examples of the type of information you should provide:

    [...]

    9.    If the nominated position is located in regional Australia, information about:

    a.    the need to employ the nominee in the nominated position and why the position cannot be filled by an Australian citizen or permanent resident living in the same local area; ...

15. No response to this invitation has been received by the Tribunal.

16. There is also no advice in relation to this application from a regional certifying body as to whether the position can be filled by an Australian citizen or permanent resident who is living in, or would move to, the local area concerned.

17. In the absence of any supporting evidence, the Tribunal is unable to find that the position of Cook with the applicant, Opinder Singh Sidhu, cannot be filled by an Australian citizen or permanent resident who is living in, or would move to, the local area concerned.

18. Given the above findings, the Tribunal is not satisfied that reg 5.19(12)(c) is met. Accordingly, reg 5.19(9)(j) and reg 5.19(4)(f) are not met.

    CONCLUDING PARAGRAPH

19. For these reasons the Tribunal is not satisfied that the applicant meets the requirements of reg 5.19. Accordingly, reg 5.19(3)(b) requires that the nomination must be refused. The decision under review must be affirmed.

    DECISION

20. The Tribunal affirms the decision under review to refuse the nomination.

    George Hallwood
    Member

    
    

    Attachment – extracts from the migration regulations 1994

    5.19Approval of nominated positions—Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa and Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa

    Application

    (1)A person (the nominator) (including a partnership or unincorporated association) may apply to the Minister for approval of the nomination of a position in Australia.

    (2)The application must:

    (a)be made in accordance with approved form 1395 (Internet); and

    (b)identify the position; and

    (c)identify a person (the identified person) in relation to the position; and

    (d)identify an occupation in relation to the position; and

    (e)identify the subclass and stream to which the nomination relates, which must be one of the following:

    (i)a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa in the Temporary Residence Transition stream;

    (ii)a Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa in the Temporary Residence Transition stream;

    (iii)a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa in the Direct Entry stream;

    (iv)Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa in the Direct Entry stream;

    (v)a Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa in the Labour Agreement stream; and

    (f)be accompanied by the fee mentioned in regulation 5.37; and

    (fa)be accompanied by any nomination training contribution charge the nominator is liable to pay in relation to the nomination; and

    (fb)identify the annual turnover (within the meaning of the Migration (Skilling Australians Fund) Charges Regulations 2018) for the nomination; and

    (g)include a written certification by the nominator stating whether or not the nominator has engaged in conduct, in relation to the nomination, that constitutes a contravention of subsection 245AR(1) of the Act.

    Approval of nomination

    (3)The Minister must, in writing:

    (a)approve the nomination if the Minister is satisfied that the requirements set out in subregulation (4) are met; or

    (b)otherwise—refuse to approve the nomination.

    Requirements for approval—general

    (4)The requirements to be met for the nomination to be approved are as follows:

    (a)the application is made in accordance with subregulation (2);

    (b)either:

    (i)there is no adverse information known to Immigration about the nominator or a person associated with the nominator; or

    (ii)it is reasonable to disregard any adverse information known to Immigration about the nominator or a person associated with the nominator;

    (c)if it is mandatory, in the State or Territory in which the position is located, for a person to:

    (i)hold a licence of a particular kind; or

    (ii)hold registration of a particular kind; or

    (iii)be a member (or a member of a particular kind) of a particular professional body;

    to perform tasks of the kind to be performed in the occupation, the identified person is, or is eligible to become, the holder of the licence, the holder of the registration, or a member of the body, at the time of application;

    (d)the nominator has a satisfactory record of compliance with the laws of the Commonwealth, and of each State or Territory in which the nominator operates a business and employs employees in the business, relating to employment;

    (da)any debt due by the nominator as mentioned in section 140ZO of the Act (recovery of nomination training contribution charge and late payment penalty) has been paid in full;

    (e)if the nomination relates to a visa in a Temporary Residence Transition stream—the requirements set out in subregulation (5) are met;

    (f)if the nomination relates to a visa in a Direct Entry stream—the requirements set out in subregulation (9) are met;

    (g)if the nomination relates to a visa in a Labour Agreement stream—the requirements set out in subregulation (14) are met.

    …

    Direct Entry stream—additional requirements for approval

    (9)If the nomination relates to a visa in a Direct Entry stream, the following requirements must also be met:

    (a)the nominator is actively and lawfully operating a business in Australia;

    (b)if the nominator’s business activities include activities related to the hiring of labour to other unrelated businesses—the position is within the business activities of the nominator and not for hire to other unrelated businesses;

    (c)the application identifies a need for the identified person to be employed in the position, under the direct control of the nominator;

    (d)there is a genuine need for the identified person to be employed in the position, under the direct control of the nominator;

    (e)the identified person will be employed on a full‑time basis in the position for at least 2 years;

    (f)the terms and conditions of the identified person’s employment will not include an express exclusion of the possibility of extending the period of employment;

    (g)the nominator’s business has the capacity to employ the identified person for at least 2 years and to pay the person at least the annual market salary rate for the occupation each year;

    (h)the requirements set out in subregulation 2.72(15) are met, applying subregulations 2.72(15) and (16) as if:

    (i)paragraph 2.72(15)(a) did not apply; and

    (ii)references to the nominee were references to the identified person; and

    (iii)references to the person were references to the nominator;

    (i)either:

    (i)there is no information known to Immigration that indicates that the employment conditions (other than in relation to earnings) that will apply to the identified person are less favourable than those that apply, or would apply, to an Australian citizen or an Australian permanent resident performing equivalent work at the same location; or

    (ii)it is reasonable to disregard any such information;

    (j)the requirements set out in subregulation (10) or (12) are met.

    Occupations for the Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) visa in the Direct Entry stream

    (10)The requirements of this subregulation are as follows:

    (a)the tasks to be performed in the position will be performed in Australia and correspond to the tasks of an occupation specified in a legislative instrument:

    (i)made under subregulation (11); and

    (ii)in force at the time the application is made;

    (b)the occupation applies to the identified person in accordance with that instrument.

    (11)The Minister may, by legislative instrument, specify occupations for the purposes of subregulation (10) and, for each occupation, specify any matters for the purposes of determining whether the occupation applies to an identified person, including matters relating to any of the following:

    (a)the nominator;

    (b)the identified person;

    (c)the occupation;

    (d)the position in which the identified person is to work;

    (e)the circumstances in which the occupation is undertaken;

    (f)the circumstances in which the person is to be employed in the position.

    Occupations for the Subclass 187 (Regional Sponsored Migration Scheme) visa in the Direct Entry stream

    (12)The requirements of this subregulation are as follows:

    (a)the position is located at a place in regional Australia;

    (b)the business operated by the nominator is located at that place;

    (c)the position cannot be filled by an Australian citizen or an Australian permanent resident who is living in, or would move to, the local area concerned;

    (d)the tasks to be performed in the position correspond to the tasks of an occupation specified in a legislative instrument:

    (i)made under subregulation (13); and

    (ii)as in force at the time the application is made;

    (e)the occupation applies to the identified person in accordance with that instrument;

    (f)the Minister has been advised by a body that meets the requirements set out in paragraph (g) of this subregulation about matters relating to the following:

    (i)whether the identified person would be paid at least the annual market salary rate for the occupation;

    (ii)whether there is a genuine need for the identified person to be employed in the position, under the direct control of the nominator;

    (iii)whether the position can be filled by an Australian citizen or an Australian permanent resident who is living in, or would move to, the local area concerned;

    (g)the body must:

    (i)be specified in a legislative instrument made by the Minister for the purposes of this paragraph; and

    (ii)be located in the State or Territory in which the position is located; and

    (iii)have responsibility for the local area in which the position is located.

    (13)The Minister may, by legislative instrument, specify occupations for the purposes of subregulation (12) and, for each occupation, specify any matters for the purposes of determining whether the occupation applies to an identified person, including matters relating to any of the following:

    (a)the nominator;

    (b)the identified person;

    (c)the occupation;

    (d)the position in which the identified person is to work;

    (e)the circumstances in which the occupation is undertaken;

    (f)the circumstances in which the person is to be employed in the position.

    …

    Meaning of regional Australia

    (16)In this regulation:

    regional Australia means a part of Australia specified in legislative instrument made by the Minister for the purposes of this definition.