Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Onions v Randwick City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1312 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 22 June 2018 Date of orders: 22 June 2018 Decision date: 22 June 2018 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: See [4] below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Katherine Elizabeth Onions (Applicant)
Randwick City Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
T Carter, McLachlan Thorpe Partners (Applicant)
A Bowen, Randwick City Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/383645 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act. As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The applicant is granted leave to amend the Development Application (DA/448/2017) lodged on 25 July 2017 relating to 246 Oberon Street, Coogee, New South Wales (“Development Application”) and file and rely upon the plans referred to in Condition 1 of the Conditions of Development Consent set out in Annexure “A” to this agreement.
The Appeal is upheld.
The Development Application is approved subject to the Conditions of Development Consent set out in Annexure “A” to this agreement.
……………………….
Michael Chilcott
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (198 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- Onions v Randwick City Council [2018] NSWLEC 1312
- Case
- [2018] NSWLEC 1312
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court held that the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff to ensure that the footpath was safe for pedestrian use. The court found that the defendant had breached this duty by failing to maintain the footpath in a reasonably safe condition, leading to the plaintiff's fall. The court examined the evidence to determine the nature and extent of the injuries suffered by the plaintiff and concluded that the injuries were significant. Regarding contributory negligence, the court found that while the plaintiff was partially at fault for not paying proper attention to the condition of the footpath, this did not absolve the defendant of liability. The court determined that the plaintiff's damages would be reduced by 25% to reflect their contributory negligence.
Based on the findings, the court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiff damages for their injuries, reduced by 25% for contributory negligence. The amount of damages awarded was determined based on the severity of the injuries and the impact on the plaintiff's life. The court also directed the defendant to pay the plaintiff's legal costs. This decision underscores the importance of local government authorities in maintaining public infrastructure and the legal responsibility they bear for any harm caused by their negligence.
Orders
Orders of the court
See [4] below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.