ONE TREE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
v
UNITED WORKERS' UNION & ANOR
[2021] HCASL 154
P9/2021
The appeal foreshadowed by this application for special leave to appeal does not enjoy sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave to appeal. Special leave should be refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application with costs.
P.A. Keane J.S. Gleeson 12 August 2021
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read One Tree Community Services Inc v United Workers' Union and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2021] HCASL 154
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the appeal had sufficient prospects of success to warrant the grant of special leave. This required an assessment of the arguments presented by One Tree Community Services Inc regarding the alleged unlawful industrial action, and whether these arguments presented a compelling case that merited further judicial review. The court was also required to consider the principles and precedents relevant to the grant of special leave in such contexts.
The court found that the appeal did not present sufficient grounds for special leave to be granted. The arguments put forward by One Tree Community Services Inc did not demonstrate a clear error of law or a significant point of principle that would justify further judicial scrutiny. The Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission's decision was deemed to be soundly based on the evidence and applicable legal principles. Consequently, the High Court refused the application for special leave, and ordered the Registrar to dismiss the application with costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.