NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: OND [2024] NSWCATGD 5 Hearing dates: 19 March 2024 Date of orders: 19 March 2024 Decision date: 19 March 2024 Jurisdiction: Guardianship Division Before: D Jay, Senior Member (Legal)
Dr M A Martin, Senior Member (Professional)
K Laurence, General Member (Community)Decision: The application to appoint a financial manager is dismissed after hearing.
Catchwords: FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT – application for a financial management order – 93-year-old subject person diagnosed with Alzheimer’s Dementia – subject person owns substantial assets – subject person incapable of managing their own affairs – existing enduring power of attorney operating in subject person’s best interests – no need to appoint a financial manager – no order made – application dismissed
Legislation Cited: None cited.
Cases Cited: P v NSW Trustee and Guardian [2015] NSWSC 579
Texts Cited: None cited.
Category: Principal judgment Parties: 001: Financial Management Application
OND (the person)
TND (applicant)
KZD (attorney)
EAD (attorney)
CYT (attorney)
NSW Trustee and GuardianRepresentation: Counsel: B Haines, Counsel for TND instructed by G Ge
Solicitors: L Gidley and R Medcalf, Solicitors for the attorneys
File Number(s): NCAT 2023/00336765 Publication restriction: Decisions of the Guardianship Division of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal have been anonymised to remove any information that may identify any person involved in the Tribunal’s proceedings: Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW), s 65.
REASONS FOR DECISION
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT APPLICATION
Background
-
OND is 93 years old and resides in privately rented accommodation. She formerly lived in her own home in Sydney’s lower north shore. That home has now been sold.
-
OND’s son is TND. Her husband passed away in 2019. She has five grandchildren – CYT, EAD, Ms Z, Ms Y and KZD.
-
On 12 November 2020 OND executed an Enduring Power of Attorney appointing EAD, CYT and KZD as her joint and several attorneys (the EPOA). The EPOA operated once the attorneys accepted their appointments. CYT accepted her appointment on 11 January 2023 and KZD and EAD accepted their appointments on 12 November 2020.
-
On 23 October 2023 TND submitted an application to appoint a financial manager. By his application TND expresses concern that his mother’s very valuable home at [Address removed for publication.] (Property AB) was sold at an undervalue. The substance of the application developed from the time it was filed to the time of the hearing to, first, focus on an allegedly identified shortfall in funds from his mother’s estate and, secondly, there being a number of allegedly serious anomalies in the conduct of the attorneys.
-
At the end of these Reasons for Decision are lists of the parties to the application and the witnesses who attended the hearing. [Appendix removed for publication.]
What did the Tribunal have to decide?
-
The questions to be considered by the Tribunal are:
Is OND incapable of managing her affairs?
Is there a need for another person to manage OND’s affairs and is it in…
Continue reading OND
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- OND [2024] NSWCATGD 5
- Case
- [2024] NSWCATGD 5
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether the existing enduring power of attorney was sufficient to manage the subject person's financial affairs, thereby rendering unnecessary the appointment of a financial manager. The court considered the subject person's capacity to manage their own affairs, the adequacy of the existing enduring power of attorney, and the potential impact of appointing a financial manager on the subject person's autonomy and best interests.
The court concluded that the existing enduring power of attorney was sufficient to manage the subject person's financial affairs and that there was no need to appoint a financial manager. The court found that the enduring power of attorney was operating effectively in the subject person's best interests, and that appointing a financial manager would not provide any additional benefit or protection for the subject person. Consequently, the court dismissed the application for the appointment of a financial manager.
The court's final order was that the application to appoint a financial manager be dismissed after hearing, reaffirming the existing enduring power of attorney's role in managing the subject person's financial affairs.
Orders
Orders of the court
The application to appoint a financial manager is dismissed after hearing.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.