Oliveri and Oliveri (No. 2)

Link copied
Case Copied 15 min read

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA

OLIVERI & OLIVERI (NO. 2) [2020] FamCA 1052
FAMILY LAW – CHILDREN – With whom a child spends time – Orders – Variation – Where the children currently spend limited supervised time with the father – Where the mother seeks that the interim spends time with orders be discharged – Where the mother seeks the children’s time with the father be at a contact centre and pending such arrangement that the time be professionally supervised – Where the mother also seeks that the father undergo a psychological assessment – Where the father opposes the mother’s application – Where the mother considers the father’s time spending with the children has not been properly supervised – Where the mother is concerned with the father’s parenting skills – Where the family report recommends the father’s time with the children be professionally supervised and reduced – Where there are allegations of family violence – Where the court needs to adopt a cautious approach with respect to interim parenting considerations – Best interests of the children – Orders.
Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) ss 60CC, 60CC(2), 60CC(3)
Marvel & Marvel (No. 2) [2010] FamCAFC 101
APPLICANT: Ms Oliveri
RESPONDENT: Mr Oliveri
FILE NUMBER: ADC 2966 of 2018
DATE DELIVERED: 10 December 2020
PLACE DELIVERED: Adelaide
PLACE HEARD: Adelaide
JUDGMENT OF: Berman J
HEARING DATE: 17 November 2020

REPRESENTATION

COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: Mr Richards
SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: Resolve Divorce Lawyers
COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: Mr McGinn
SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: Clelands Lawyers Adelaide Pty Ltd

Orders

  1. That paragraph 2 of orders made 8 July 2020 is varied as follows:-

    (a)That X and Y both born … 2017 (“the children”) spend time with the father as follows:-

    (i)from 10.00 am until 3.00 pm on Saturday commencing 11 July 2020 and each alternate Saturday thereafter; and

    (ii)from 10.00 am until 3.00 pm on Sunday commencing 19 July 2020 and each alternate Sunday thereafter.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Oliveri & Oliveri has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).

Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for Judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 17.02A(b) of the Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 17.02 Family Law Rules 2004 (Cth).

FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT ADELAIDE

FILE NUMBER: ADC 2966 of 2018

Ms Oliveri

Applicant

And

Mr Oliveri

Respondent

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

Introduction  

  1. Following a contested hearing on 17 June 2020, reasons for judgment were delivered on 8 July 2020.

  2. Orders were made that until further order X and Y both born in 2017 (“the children”) live with the mother and spend time with the father as follows:-

    (a)from 10.00 am until 5.00 pm on Saturday commencing 11…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Oliveri and Oliveri (No. 2) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2020] FamCA 1052
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Oliveri and Oliveri (No. 2)*, Berman J of the Family Court of Australia considered an application by the mother to vary existing interim parenting orders. The mother sought to discharge orders for the children to spend time with the father, proposing instead that such time occur at a contact centre and be professionally supervised pending a suitable arrangement. She also sought a psychological assessment of the father. The father opposed these applications.

The central legal issues before the court were whether the existing interim parenting orders should be varied to provide for professionally supervised time between the father and the children, and whether a psychological assessment of the father was warranted. These considerations were framed within the overarching principle of the best interests of the children, particularly in light of allegations of family violence and concerns raised by the mother regarding the father's parenting skills and the adequacy of supervision of his time with the children.

Berman J adopted a cautious approach to the interim parenting arrangements, acknowledging the need to prioritise the children's safety and well-being. The court had regard to the family report, which recommended professionally supervised and reduced time for the father. Consequently, the court varied the existing orders to provide for the children to spend time with the father on alternate Saturdays and Sundays between 10.00 am and 3.00 pm, commencing on specific dates in July 2020.

Orders

Orders of the court

1.

That paragraph 2 of orders made 8 July 2020 is varied as follows:-

(a) That X and Y both born … 2017 (“the children”) spend time with the father as follows:-

(i) from 10.00 am until 3.00 pm on Saturday commencing 11 July 2020 and each alternate Saturday thereafter; and

(ii) from 10.00 am until 3.00 pm on Sunday commencing 19 July 2020 and each alternate Sunday thereafter.

Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry of the order in the Court’s records.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.