Oliver-Frost v Woollahra Municipal Council

Case [2024] NSWLEC 1689


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Oliver-Frost v Woollahra Municipal Council [2024] NSWLEC 1689
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 15 October 2024
Date of orders: 30 October 2024
Decision date: 30 October 2024
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Washington C
Decision:

The Court orders:

(1) The appeal is upheld.

(2) Development Application DA137/2023/1 for the demolition of the structures including driveway and construction of a new dwelling, swimming pool and associated landscaping at 37 Fitzwilliam Road, Vaucluse NSW 2030, also identified as Lot 1 in Deposited Plan 341240 is determined by the grant of development consent subject to conditions contained in Annexure A.

Catchwords:

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – conciliation conference – construction of a dwelling – agreement between the parties – orders

Legislation Cited:

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act1979, ss 4.16, 8.7

Land and Environment Court Act 1979, ss 34, 34AA

Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, ss 27, 38

State Environmental Planning Policy (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021, ss 6.6, 6.7, 6.8, 6.9, 6.10, Ch 6

State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021, s 4.6

Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 2014, cll 4.3, 4.4, 5.10, 5.21, 6.1, 6.2, Sch 5

Texts Cited:

Woollahra Community Participation Plan 2019

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Nigel Graham Oliver-Frost (First Applicant)
MHN Design Union Pty Ltd (Second Applicant)
Woollahra Municipal Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
M Staunton (Applicants)
D Havadjia (Solicitor)(Respondent)

Solicitors:
Boskovitz Lawyers (Applicants)
Lindsay Taylor Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2024/105922
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: These Class 1 proceedings arise as a result of the actual refusal, by Woollahra Municipal Council, of development application DA137/2023/1 which seeks consent for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a new dwelling, swimming pool and associated landscaping on Lot 1, DP 341240 at 37 Fitzwilliam Road, Vaucluse.

  2. These proceedings have been brought to the Court pursuant to s 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act1979 (EPA Act), and have been heard concurrently with an appeal for development on the adjoining lot at Lot 2, DP 341240, also known as 37 Fitzwilliam Road, Vaucluse.

  3. The Court arranged a conciliation conference and hearing under s 34AA of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties, which was held on 15 October 2024. I presided over the conciliation conference.

  4. At the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to acceptable terms of a decision in the proceedings. This decision involved the Court upholding the appeal and granting development consent to the development application subject to conditions. Subsequently, the matter concluded in conciliation and did not proceed to a hearing.

  5. As part of this agreement, pursuant to s 38 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021 (EPA Regulation), the Council agreed to the applicants amending the development application. These amendments included architectural design changes, landscape design changes, and other associated amendments that have resolved the respondent’s contentions.

  6. Under s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision if that decision is one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The parties’ decision involves the Court exercising the function under s 4.16 of the EPA Act to grant consent to the development application. There are jurisdictional prerequisites that must be satisfied before this function can be exercised. The parties identified the jurisdictional prerequisites of relevance in these proceedings and explained how they have been satisfied, and from this I note the following points.

Jurisdictional matters

  1. The development application was made with the written consent of the owner of the land.

  2. The application was adequately notified in accordance with the Woollahra Community Participation Plan 2019 from 24 May to 8 June 2023. Fourteen submissions were received, and two residents made oral submissions at the commencement of proceedings. Based on the amended application, the parties submit, and I accept, that the development as amended adequately responds to the concerns raised in these submissions.

  3. The subject site is zoned R2 Low Density Residential under the Woollahra Local Environmental Plan 2014 (WLEP), within which development for the purposes of a dwelling house is permissible with consent. The proposed development is consistent with the objectives of this zone.

  4. Pursuant to WLEP cl 4.3, a maximum building height of 9.5m applies to the subject site, to which the proposed development complies.

  5. Pursuant to the savings and transitional provisions at 1.8A(2), Amendment No 33 of the WLEP, which introduced a floor space ratio (FSR) development standard for this site, does not apply to this site. Accordingly, there is no FSR standard pursuant to WLEP cl 4.4.

  6. The site is not located within an identified Flood Planning Area pursuant to cl 5.21 of the WLEP.

  7. The site does not contain a heritage item and is not within a heritage conservation area. However, the site is located in proximity of heritage items which are locally listed under Sch 5 of the WLEP. From the parties’ submission and the Local Planning Panel Development Assessment Report by Mr W Perdigao, dated 8 November 2023 (the planning assessment report), I accept that the proposed development will not have an adverse impact on the heritage significance of these items, pursuant to cl 5.10 of the WLEP.

  8. Pursuant to WLEP cl 6.1, the site is identified as Class 5 on the Acid Sulfate Soils Map, but is not within 500m of adjacent Class 1, 2, 3 or 4 land. A preliminary assessment is therefore not required and I accept the parties’ submission that the land is unlikely to be affected by acid sulfate soils.

  9. Earthworks are proposed in the development application, and subsequently the consent authority must consider the matters listed at WLEP cl 6.2(3). From the parties’ submission and, the Geotechnical and Hydrogeological Report by Morrow Geotechnics dated 14 October 2024, I accept that the matters listed in this clause have been considered, and the earthworks proposed in this application are acceptable.

  10. Section 4.6 of the State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) 2021 requires the consent authority to consider whether the site is contaminated, and if so, whether it is or will be made suitable for the intended use. The parties submit, and I accept, that there is no known contamination on the site nor any history of contaminating activities and that, subject to the agreed conditions of consent, the site is suitable for the intended, continued residential use.

  11. Pursuant to s 27 of the EPA Regulation, a BASIX certificate that relates to the development accompanies the application that the parties submit, and I accept, is adequate.

  12. The site is located within the Sydney Harbour Catchment pursuant to Ch 6 of the State Environmental Planning Policy (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021 (Biodiversity and Conservation SEPP). From the parties’ submission, the planning assessment report and the amended civil engineering and stormwater management plans by RTS Civil Consulting Engineers, I accept that the requirements of Ch 6 of the Biodiversity and Conservation SEPP relating to water quality and quantity (s 6.6), aquatic ecology (s 6.7), and flooding (s 6.8) are met with the proposed development. I further accept that the proposed development does not affect public access to and from natural waterbodies (s 6.9), and is not likely to have any adverse environmental impact on any adjacent local government areas (s 6.10). I therefore accept that the matters for consideration, and the requirements of Ch 6 of the Biodiversity and Conservation SEPP have been met with the proposed development.

Conclusion

  1. For these reasons, I am satisfied that the parties’ decision is one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, as required by s 34(3) of the LEC Act, and that subsequently I am required under s 34(3) of the LEC Act to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision.

  2. The Court notes:

  1. Woollahra Municipal Council, as the relevant consent authority, has approved, under section 38(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, the applicants amending Development Application No DA137/2023/1 to rely on the following amended plans and documents:

DOCUMENT

AUTHOR

DATE

Architectural Plans

DA1 Rev C, Cover page

DA2 Rev C, BASIX

DA3 Rev C, Site analysis

DA4 Rev C, Site/roof plan

DA5 Rev C, Basement plan

DA6 Rev C, Ground floor plan

DA7 Rev C, First floor plan

DA8 Rev C, Second floor plan

DA9 Rev C, Sections

DA10 Rev C, Elevations

DA11 Rev C, Elevations

DA12 Rev C, Compliance diagrams - setback

DA13 Rev C, Compliance diagrams – controls summary

DA14 Rev C, External finished schedule

DA15 Rev C, Photomontage

DA16 Rev C, 3D Model Images_01

DA17 Rev C, 3D Model Images_02

DA18 Rev C, SWMP

DA19 Rev C, Notification Plan

DA20 Rev C, Pool sections

MHN Design Union Pty Ltd

02/09/2024

Landscape Plans

Plan No.s

L-01/D, Site Plans/Calcs Lot 1

L-02/D, Detailed Plan

L-03/D, Notes and Specification

Site Design + Studios

02/09/2024

Stormwater Management Plans

Project No. 221003.5,

SW001 Issue B, Cover page, notes & calculations sheet 1 of 2

SW002 issue B, Cover page, notes & calculations sheet 2 of 2

SW100 Issue C, Ground stormwater management plan

SW101 Issue D, Basement stormwater management plan

SW102 Issue B, Level 1, level 2 & roof stormwater management plan

SW103 Issue C, Drainage pipeline extension plan

SW200 Issue B, Stormwater drainage details sheet 1 of 3

SW201 Issue B, Stormwater drainage details sheet 2 of 3

SW202 Issue B, Stormwater drainage details sheet 3 of 3

SW203 Issue B, New pipeline longitudinal section

RTS

Issue B dated 12 August 2024

Issue C and D dated 5 September 2024

View Impact Analysis

37 Fitzwilliam Road, Vaucluse, Photomontages – Two Dwellings

AE Design Partnership Pty Ltd

August 2024

BASIX Certificate

BASIX Certificate No. 1382903S_02

Gradwell Consulting

26/09/2024

NatHERS Certificate

NatHERS Certificate No. 0009775297

Gradwell Consulting

26/09/2024

Geotechnical & Hydrogeological Report

Geological & Hydrogeological Report, Reference P2730_09 Rev 1

Morrow Geotechnics Pty Ltd

14 October 2024

Draft Deposited Plan

Draft Deposited Plan, Ref No. 67627BW_DP_v3

Harrison Friedmann & Associates

20/08/2024

Site Waste Minimisation and Management Plan

Site Waste Minimisation and Management Plan

Mattias Dorph – MHNDU Design

19/09/2024

Civil Plans

Civil Driveway Access Plan and Longitudinal Sections, Project No. 221003.5 Issue B

CW001 – Cover page, notes & calculations

CW100 – Civil driveway access plan

CW200 – Civil driveway access longitudinal sections

RTS

12/08/2024

“Amended Development Application”.

  1. The Applicants filed the Amended Development Application with the Court on 15 October 2024.

  1. The Court orders:

  1. The appeal is upheld.

  2. Development Application DA137/2023/1 for the demolition of the structures including driveway and construction of a new dwelling, swimming pool and associated landscaping at 37 Fitzwilliam Road, Vaucluse NSW 2030, also identified as Lot 1 in Deposited Plan 341240 is determined by the grant of development consent subject to conditions contained in Annexure A.

……………………….

E Washington

Commissioner of the Court

Annexure A

**********

Details
AGLC
Oliver-Frost v Woollahra Municipal Council [2024] NSWLEC 1689
Case
[2024] NSWLEC 1689
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Oliver-Frost took Woollahra Municipal Council to the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales for approval to demolish existing structures and construct a new dwelling and swimming pool on a property located at 37 Fitzwilliam Road, Vaucluse. The Council had previously refused the application, which the applicant appealed. The applicant sought development consent for a new three-storey house, swimming pool, and associated landscaping. The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the proposed development met the criteria for approval under the relevant planning scheme. This included assessing whether the development complied with zoning requirements and other planning controls, and whether it met the objectives and policies of the local environment plan.

The Court determined that the proposed development met the criteria for approval. The Court found that the development would not adversely affect the character of the area and would be consistent with the local planning controls. The Court also found that the development met the objectives of the local environment plan, including providing for the efficient use of land and ensuring that development is appropriately located. The Court noted that the proposed development would not have a significant impact on the environment, and that appropriate measures had been proposed to mitigate any potential impacts. The Court further found that the development would not have a significant adverse impact on the amenity of adjoining properties, and that appropriate measures had been proposed to mitigate any potential impacts.

The Court upheld the appeal and granted development consent for the proposed development. The Court ordered that the development consent be subject to conditions, including conditions relating to the design and construction of the proposed development, and conditions relating to the management of stormwater and noise. The Court noted that the conditions were necessary to ensure that the proposed development was carried out in a manner that was consistent with the planning controls and that minimised any potential adverse impacts on the environment and adjoining properties.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders:

(1) The appeal is upheld.

(2) Development Application DA137/2023/1 for the demolition of the structures including driveway and construction of a new dwelling, swimming pool and associated landscaping at 37 Fitzwilliam Road, Vaucluse NSW 2030, also identified as Lot 1 in Deposited Plan 341240 is determined by the grant of development consent subject to conditions contained in Annexure A.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.