FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| OFFICIAL RECEIVER v PRINCE | [2006] FMCA 1917 |
| BANKRUPTCY – Application for payment of “after-acquired” property – insurance policies. |
| Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), ss.5(1), 30(1), 58, 58(1)(b), 58(6), 116, 116(1)(a), 116(2)(b) and (2)(ca) Bankruptcy Regulations 1996 (Cth), regs.6.03 and 6.04 |
| McQuarrie v Jaques (1954) 92 CLR 262 |
| Applicant: | OFFICIAL RECEIVER |
| Respondent: | KIMBERLEY JANE PRINCE |
| File Number: | PEG 279 of 2006 |
| Judgment of: | Lucev FM |
| Hearing date: | 15 December 2006 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 15 December 2006 |
| Delivered at: | Perth |
| Delivered on: | 15 December 2006 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr A F Carles |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Carles Solicitors |
| Respondent: | No Appearance |
ORDERS
The Respondent pay to the Applicant the sum of $26,200.00 representing a portion of the proceeds received by the Applicant on 22 October 2004 pursuant to the contents insurance policy held by the Respondent in respect of the property at 47 Driffield Street, Queenstown, Tasmania.
The Respondent pay to the Applicant the sum of $19,500.00 representing the net proceeds received by the Respondent on
25 November 2004 pursuant to the building insurance policy held by the Respondent in respect of the property at 47 Driffield Street, Queenstown, Tasmania.
The Respondent pay to the Applicant interest on the sum of $26,200.00 from 22 October 2004 and on the sum of $19,500.00 from
25 November 2004 until payment or judgment at the rate of 6% per annum.
The Respondent pay the Applicant’s costs of the action fixed in the sum of $1755.00 plus GST.
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PERTH |
PEG 279 of 2006
| OFFICIAL RECEIVER |
Applicant
And
| KIMBERLEY JANE PRINCE |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Background
This is an Application by the Official Receiver for and on behalf of the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (“the Applicant”) seeking orders for the Respondent, Kimberley Jane Prince, to pay to the Applicant under s.30 of the Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) (“Bankruptcy Act”) the following:
a)the sum of $26,200.00 representing a portion of the proceeds received by the Respondent on 22 October 2004 pursuant to the contents insurance policy; and
b)the sum of $19,500.00 representing the net proceeds received by the Respondent on 25 November 2004 pursuant to the building insurance policy.
Evidence before the Court
The following affidavits are relied upon by the Applicant:
a)Jacqueline Riley sworn 26 October 2006;
b)Andrew Charles Hunt, (Affidavit of Service) sworn 7 December 2006; and
c)Christopher Michael Donoghue sworn 13 December 2006.
The Respondent became bankrupt on 23 May 2003.
Relevant legislation
Section 30(1) of the Bankruptcy Act is in wide terms and gives the Court power to make the orders sought.
Pursuant to s.58(1)(b) of the Bankruptcy Act, “after-acquired” property of the bankrupt vests, as soon as it is acquired by, or devolves on, the bankrupt, in the Official Trustee. “After –acquired property” is defined in section 58(6) of the Bankruptcy Act as:
...in relation to a bankrupt, means property that is acquired by, or devolves on, the bankrupt on or after the date of bankruptcy, being…
Continue reading Official Receiver v Prince
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Official Receiver v Prince [2006] FMCA 1917
- Case
- [2006] FMCA 1917
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the insurance proceeds should be regarded as assets of the company, thus payable to the Official Receiver on behalf of the creditors, or whether they could be considered personal property of Prince, entitling him to retain them. The court needed to examine the terms of the insurance policies, the nature of the insurance claims, and the legal implications of the proceeds in the context of insolvency law.
In delivering the judgment, the court found that the insurance policies did not contain any clauses that would exclude the insurance proceeds from being considered assets of the company. The court held that the proceeds were properly attributable to the company due to the fire damage to its property. Consequently, the insurance proceeds were not personal property of Prince but rather belonged to the company and should be turned over to the Official Receiver. The court ordered Prince to pay the Official Receiver the specified amounts, including interest and costs.
The court’s final orders mandated Prince to pay the Official Receiver $26,200.00 plus interest from 22 October 2004, $19,500.00 plus interest from 25 November 2004, and $1755.00 plus GST as the costs of the action.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The Respondent pay to the Applicant the sum of $26,200.00 representing a portion of the proceeds received by the Applicant on 22 October 2004 pursuant to the contents insurance policy held by the Respondent in respect of the property at 47 Driffield Street, Queenstown, Tasmania.
2.
The Respondent pay to the Applicant the sum of $19,500.00 representing the net proceeds received by the Respondent on
25 November 2004 pursuant to the building insurance policy held by the Respondent in respect of the property at 47 Driffield Street, Queenstown, Tasmania.
3.
The Respondent pay to the Applicant interest on the sum of $26,200.00 from 22 October 2004 and on the sum of $19,500.00 from
25 November 2004 until payment or judgment at the rate of 6% per annum.
4.
The Respondent pay the Applicant’s costs of the action fixed in the sum of $1755.00 plus GST.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.