FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| OFFICIAL RECEIVER v MAHER & ANOR (No.3) | [2011] FMCA 603 |
| BANKRUPTCY – Application for issuance of Property (Seizure and Delivery) Order – non-compliance with Court Orders – failure to deliver up vacant possession of premises. |
| Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth), s.77(1)(g) Civil Judgments Enforcement Act 2004 (WA), s.59(1) Federal Court Rules (Cth), O.37, r.7(2) Federal Magistrates Act 1999 (Cth), s.78(2) and (3) Rules of the Supreme Court 1971 (WA), O.46, r.2(1)(a) |
| Applicant: | OFFICIAL RECEIVER FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY |
| First Respondent: | GILBERT FRANCIS MAHER |
| Second Respondent: | JANICE MAHER |
| File Number: | PEG 154 of 2010 |
| Judgment of: | Lucev FM |
| Hearing date: | 3 August 2011 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 3 August 2011 |
| Delivered at: | Perth |
| Delivered on: | 3 August 2011 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr C Donoghue |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Carles Solicitors |
| For the First Respondent: | No appearance |
| For the Second Respondent: | No appearance |
ORDERS
A Property (Seizure and Deliver) Order (“PSDO”) be issued by a Registrar of this Court in terms of the draft PSDO Order filed in the Court Registry 24 June 2011, to give effect to Order 11 handed down by Federal Magistrate Lucev on 3 November 2010 and Order 3 handed down by Federal Magistrate Lucev on 16 May 2011.
| FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT PERTH |
PEG 154 of 2010
| OFFICIAL RECEIVER FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE OFFICIAL TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY |
Applicant
And
| GILBERT FRANCIS MAHER |
First Respondent
| JANICE MAHER |
Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(Ex tempore reasons – edited from transcript)
Introduction
In this matter the applicant, the Official Receiver for and on behalf of the Official Trustee in Bankruptcy, seeks, as amended during the hearing today, a Property Seizure and Delivery Order[1] to be issued in terms of the draft PSDO filed in the Court Registry on 24 June 2011, to give effect to:
a)Order 11 handed down by the Court as presently constituted on 3 November 2001; and
b)Order 3 handed down by the Court as presently constituted on 16 May 2011.
[1] “PSDO”.
The first respondent, Mr Maher, is the partner of the second respondent, Ms Maher. The second respondent is a bankrupt, and the Official Receiver acts for and on behalf of the Official Trustee of her bankrupt estate.
Background
The relevant facts are conveniently set out, in large part, in the affidavit of Jacqueline Riley, sworn 23 June 2011.[2] Ms Riley is a public servant employed in the office of the Official Receiver in Perth. Relevantly, that affidavit says:
2.On the 3 November 2010 the Official Trustee obtained orders (“the First Orders”) in these proceedings which were personally served on the First Respondent on 23 November 2010.
3.The First Orders provided among other things that the First Respondent vacate the premises known as 82…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Official Receiver v Maher and Anor (No.3) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2011] FMCA 603
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
A Property (Seizure and Deliver) Order (“PSDO”) be issued by a Registrar of this Court in terms of the draft PSDO Order filed in the Court Registry 24 June 2011, to give effect to Order 11 handed down by Federal Magistrate Lucev on 3 November 2010 and Order 3 handed down by Federal Magistrate Lucev on 16 May 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.