Odtojan v Glynn t/as Glynns Lawyers; Odtojan v Ford (No 2)

Case [2024] NSWCA 25


Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Odtojan v Glynn t/as Glynns Lawyers; Odtojan v Ford (No 2) [2024] NSWCA 25
Hearing dates: On the papers
Decision date: 14 February 2024
Before: White JA; Basten AJA
Decision:

Registrar of the Court is directed to refer the judgments in Odtojan v Glynn and Odtojan v Ford and the papers in these proceedings, including the email of Tuesday 5 December 2023 11:56pm, to the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner.

Catchwords:

PROFESSIONS – Legal Practitioners – misconduct and discipline – legal practitioners directed to show cause why judgments and papers should not be referred to Legal Services Commissioner – no submissions provided by legal practitioners – judgments and papers referred to Legal Services Commissioner

Cases Cited:

Odtojan v Condon (No 2) [2023] NSWCA 149

Odtojan v Condon [2023] NSWCA 129

Odtojan v Ford [2023] NSWCA 277

Odtojan v Glynn t/as Glynns Lawyers [2023] NSWCA 276

Category:Consequential orders
Parties: Marie Jossane Odtojan (Applicant)
Thomas Patrick Glynn t/as Glynn’s Lawyers (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
Applicant appeared in person with Mr A Bryl
Ms A Horvath SC with Ms M Hall (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Applicant in person with Mr A Bryl
Moray & Agnew Lawyers (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2023/131229; 2023/131242
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
District Court of New South Wales
Jurisdiction:
Civil
Date of Decision:
28 March 2023
Before:
Norton SC DCJ
File Number(s):
2022/273977

Judgment

  1. THE COURT: On 21 November 2023 we dismissed with costs Ms Odtojan’s summons for leave to appeal from orders of the District Court of New South Wales, striking out Ms Odtojan’s statement of claim with only limited leave to replead. We concluded that there was no proper basis for Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl to maintain allegations of fraud and collusion against Mr Ford and Mr Glynn (Odtojan v Glynn t/as Glynns Lawyers [2023] NSWCA 276; Odtojan v Ford [2023] NSWCA 277).

  2. In Odtojan v Condon [2023] NSWCA 129, similar allegations were made by Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl about the conduct of Mr Condon. In Odtojan v Condon (No 2) [2023] NSWCA 149, this Court referred the papers in those proceedings to the Legal Services Commissioner.

  3. On 21 November 2023 we ordered that, within 14 days, Ms Odjotan and Mr Bryl show cause why the judgments in Odtojan v Glynn and Odtojan v Ford, and the papers in this Court, should not be referred to the Legal Services Commissioner. At the request of Ms Odtojan and Mr Bryl, on 6 December 2023, we extended the time for provision of such admissions to 12 December 2023.

  4. No submissions addressing that issue have been provided by Ms Odtojan or Mr Bryl. They provided a lengthy and inappropriate email questioning the reasons of 21 November 2023 but no submissions as to why the judgments and the papers in this Court should not be referred to the Legal Services Commissioner.

  5. The reasons of Leeming and Kirk JJA in Odtojan v Condon (No 2) apply equally to these proceedings.

  6. We direct the Registrar of the Court to refer the judgments in Odtojan v Glynn and Odtojan v Ford and the papers in these proceedings, including the email of Tuesday 5 December 2023 11:56pm, to the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner.

**********

Details
AGLC
Odtojan v Glynn t/as Glynns Lawyers; Odtojan v Ford (No 2) [2024] NSWCA 25
Case
[2024] NSWCA 25
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The proceedings involved the parties Odtojan (the applicant) and Glynn t/as Glynns Lawyers and Ford (the respondents). The dispute concerned the conduct of the respondents, legal practitioners, in relation to judgments and papers within the proceedings. The matter came before the Court of Appeal of New South Wales.

The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the judgments and papers in the proceedings, including a specific email, should be referred to the Legal Services Commissioner for investigation into potential misconduct. This question arose in circumstances where the legal practitioners had been directed to show cause why such a referral should not occur, but had failed to provide any submissions in response.

The Court reasoned that the failure of the legal practitioners to provide any submissions in response to the direction to show cause meant there was no material before the Court to suggest that the judgments and papers should not be referred. Consequently, the Court exercised its discretion to refer the relevant documents to the Legal Services Commissioner. The Registrar of the Court was directed to make the referral.

Orders

Orders of the court

Registrar of the Court is directed to refer the judgments in Odtojan v Glynn and Odtojan v Ford and the papers in these proceedings, including the email of Tuesday 5 December 2023 11:56pm, to the Office of the Legal Services Commissioner.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.