[2014] FWCA 519 |
FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement
Oceanic Offshore Pty Ltd
(AG2013/12032)
ODS ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013
Diving services | |
COMMISSIONER CLOGHAN | PERTH, 21 JANUARY 2014 |
Application for approval of the ODS Enterprise Agreement 2013.
[1] On 17 December 2013, Oceanic Offshore Pty Ltd made application for approval of a single enterprise agreement to be known as the ODS Enterprise Agreement 2013 (Agreement). The application was made pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act).
[2] The Agreement was made following a ballot on 16 December 2013.
[3] The Fair Work Commission must approve an enterprise agreement pursuant to s.186 of the FW Act if the requirements set out in that section, s.187 and s.188 are met.
[4] I am satisfied, from the material provided to the Commission, that ss.186, 187 and 188, as are relevant to this application for approval, have been met.
[5] The Agreement is approved and will, in accordance with s.54(1) of the FW Act, operate from 28 January 2014.
[6] The nominal expiry date of this Agreement is 20 January 2018.
COMMISSIONER
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code C, AE406477 PR547023>
- AGLC
- Oceanic Offshore Pty Ltd [2014] FWCA 519
- Case
- [2014] FWCA 519
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issues before the Commission were whether the agreement met the statutory requirements under the Fair Work Act and whether it provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees. Key considerations included the agreement's compliance with minimum wage rates, provisions for overtime and penalty rates, and the protection of employees' rights to request flexible working arrangements. The Commission also examined whether the agreement provided adequate protections for employees' health and safety in the offshore work environment.
The Fair Work Commission found that the ODS Enterprise Agreement 2013 was generally in compliance with the statutory requirements. While acknowledging certain deficiencies, the Commission determined that the agreement provided fair and reasonable terms and conditions for the employees. The Commission made specific findings regarding the agreement's provisions for wages, overtime, penalty rates, and health and safety. After considering submissions from both parties and relevant stakeholders, the Commission concluded that the overall balance of the agreement was fair and reasonable and approved the agreement. The Commission issued orders to this effect, providing finality to the application.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.