FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
(DIVISION 2)
Oberon & Aquila (No 2) [2025] FedCFamC2F 400
File number(s): SYC 7367 of 2022 Judgment of: JUDGE COLQUHOUN Date of judgment: 28 March 2025 Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – PROPERTY – where the parties are in dispute of the interpretation of a final order – where there is evidence of family violence – where the wife requires access to the property for the purposes of arranging work to be carried out in order to sell the property – where the order should be varied to reflect the intention of the Court Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) s 68B
Federal Circuit Court and Family Law Rules 2021 (Cth) r 10.13(1)(e)
Cases cited: Oberon & Aquila [2025] FedCFamC2F 105
Pawley & Pawley (No 2) [2017] FamCAFC 136
Division: Division 2 Family Law Number of paragraphs: 24 Date of last submission/s: 13 March 2025 Date of hearing: In Chambers – determined on the papers Place: Sydney Solicitor for the Applicant: Ms Malic of Southern Waters Legal For the Respondent: Litigant in person ORDERS
SYC 7367 of 2022 FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 2)
BETWEEN: MS OBERON
Applicant
AND: MR AQUILA
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
JUDGE COLQUHOUN
DATE OF ORDER:
28 MARCH 2025
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.Order 5 of the Orders dated 7 February 2025, pursuant to r 10.13(1)(e) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth), be varied by inserting the following additional words before the full stop:
and, for the purposes of this Order, the husband shall vacate the Suburb C property, including removal of all belongings he wishes to retain, by 5pm on 11 April 2025.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).
Part XIVB of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish an account of proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under a pseudonym has been approved pursuant to subsection 114Q(2) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
JUDGE COLQUHOUN:
On 7 February 2024 I delivered reasons for judgment and made orders for the disposition of property adjustment proceedings between the applicant wife, Ms Oberon (“the wife”), and the respondent husband, Mr Aquila (“the husband”): Oberon & Aquila [2025] FedCFamC2F 105 (“the Primary Judgment”).
The parties are now in dispute about the interpretation of Order 5 of those orders:
The Trustee is empowered to take possession of the [Suburb C] property and require…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Oberon & Aquila (No 2) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2025] FedCFamC2F 400
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court addressed the legal issues by examining the evidence presented and the specific provisions of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth). It was necessary to determine whether the existing order adequately reflected the intentions of the court, given the unique circumstances of the case, particularly the allegations of family violence and the necessity for Ms Oberon to access the property. The court considered the practicalities and the necessity for Ms Oberon to have access to the property in order to sell it, while also ensuring that the safety and well-being of both parties were protected.
The court concluded that the existing order did not fully encapsulate the intention of the court in light of the new evidence and circumstances. It found that the husband should vacate the property by 5pm on 11 April 2025, allowing Ms Oberon the necessary access to arrange for work to be done, thereby facilitating the sale of the property. This variation was intended to provide clarity and ensure that the court's original intention was properly executed. The court issued an order varying the existing property settlement order accordingly, ensuring that the husband vacated the property by the specified date.
Orders
Orders of the court
SYC 7367 of 2022
FEDERAL CIRCUIT AND FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA (DIVISION 2)
BETWEEN:
MS OBERON
Applicant
AND:
MR AQUILA
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
JUDGE COLQUHOUN
DATE OF ORDER:
28 MARCH 2025
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Order 5 of the Orders dated 7 February 2025, pursuant to r 10.13(1)(e) of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth), be varied by inserting the following additional words before the full stop:
and, for the purposes of this Order, the husband shall vacate the Suburb C property, including removal of all belongings he wishes to retain, by 5pm on 11 April 2025.
Note: The form of the order is subject to the entry in the Court’s records.
Note: This copy of the Court’s Reasons for judgment may be subject to review to remedy minor typographical or grammatical errors (r 10.14(b) Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth)), or to record a variation to the order pursuant to r 10.13 Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia (Family Law) Rules 2021 (Cth).
Part XIVB of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) makes it an offence, except in very limited circumstances, to publish an account of proceedings that identify persons, associated persons, or witnesses involved in family law proceedings.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.