Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Oates v Northern Beaches Council [2021] NSWLEC 1684 Hearing dates: 4 November 2021 Date of orders: 9 November 2021 Decision date: 09 November 2021 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O’Neill C Decision: The orders of the Court are:
1) The appeal is dismissed.
2) Development Application No. 2020/1684 for alterations and additions to a group home to enlarge the northern balconies, at 89 Wyadra Avenue, North Manly, is refused.
3) The exhibits, other than Exhibits 1 and C, are returned.
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – alterations and additions to an existing group home to enlarge balconies – amended development application – visual privacy and amenity impacts – building bulk uncharacteristic of the low density residential locality
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 8.7
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, cl 55
Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34
Warringah Local Environmental Plan 2011
Cases Cited: Davies v Penrith City Council [2013] NSWLEC 1141
Mison v Randwick Municipal Council (1991) 23 NSWLR 734
Texts Cited: Warringah Development Control Plan 2011
Category: Principal judgment Parties: Tom Oates (Applicant)
Northern Beaches Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
J Farrell (Respondent)
Self-represented (Applicant)
Northern Beaches Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2021/177837 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to the provisions of s 8.7(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (EPA Act) against the refusal of Development Application No. 2020/1684 for alterations and additions to a group home known as Manly House to enlarge the northern balconies, including opaque or solid balustrades, privacy screens and planter boxes (the proposal), at 89 Wyadra Avenue, North Manly (the site) by Northern Beaches Council (the Council) on 16 June 2021.
-
The appeal was subject to conciliation on 9 August 2021, in accordance with the provisions of s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act). As agreement was not reached, the conciliation conference was terminated, pursuant to s 34(4) of the LEC Act.
The development application is amended
-
The applicant sought leave to amend the development application to rely on the amended sketches in the Class 1 Application bundle (Ex C). The Council, as the relevant consent authority under cl 55(1) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, agreed to the applicant amending the application.
-
I made the following orders on 4 November 2021:
“(1) The applicant is granted leave to amend Development Application No. 2020/1684 to rely on the sketches in the Class 1 Application bundle, Exhibit C.
(2) The parties are to facilitate the amended application being lodged the on the NSW planning portal by 11 November 2021, and the applicant is to file a copy of the amended development application after the amendment has been lodged on the NSW planning portal.”
-
The Council uploaded the amended development application on 4 November 2011 and filed the sketches shortly afterwards.
Issues
-
The Council’s contentions can be summarised as:
The proposal would provide inadequate visual privacy to…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Oates v Northern Beaches Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2021] NSWLEC 1684
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the proposed development complied with the local planning instrument and planning scheme, and whether the council's decision to refuse the development application was lawful. The court was required to determine whether the proposed development was consistent with the relevant planning scheme and whether the council's decision was based on appropriate and relevant considerations. The court also needed to consider whether the decision was unreasonable or otherwise not justified.
The court found that the proposed development did not comply with the local planning instrument and planning scheme, and that the council's decision to refuse the development application was lawful. The court held that the proposed development was not consistent with the relevant planning scheme, as it involved alterations and additions to a group home that were not permitted under the scheme. The court further found that the council's decision was based on appropriate and relevant considerations, and that the decision was not unreasonable or otherwise not justified. The court dismissed the appeal and confirmed the council's decision to refuse the development application.
Orders
Orders of the court
The orders of the Court are:
1) The appeal is dismissed.
2) Development Application No. 2020/1684 for alterations and additions to a group home to enlarge the northern balconies, at 89 Wyadra Avenue, North Manly, is refused.
3) The exhibits, other than Exhibits 1 and C, are returned.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.