LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND
CITATION: O’Shane & Anor v Cook Shire Council [2016] QLC 77 PARTIES: Patrick Daniel Michael O’Shane & Hamish William Bergerson
(applicants)v Cook Shire Council
(respondent)FILE NO: MRA248-16 DIVISION: General Division PROCEEDING: Determination of compensation for grant of mining lease. DELIVERED ON: 8 December 2016 DELIVERED AT: Brisbane HEARD ON: Submissions closed 5 September 2016. HEARD AT: Heard on the papers JUDICIAL REGISTRAR: GJ Smith ORDERS: 1. In respect of ML 100068 compensation is determined in the total amount of $495.00.
2. That the applicants pay compensation to the respondent the amount set out in Order 1 within three months of the date of grant of the mining lease by Department of Natural Resources and Mines.
CATCHWORDS: MINING LEASE – referral – grant – mining lease area – access – determination of compensation – absence of expert or valuation evidence – use of Court judgments for determination purposes.
Mineral Resources Act 1989 s 279, 281
Fitzgerald & Anor v Struber & Anor [2009] QLC 76
Tinpitch Pty Ltd v Cook Shire Council [2016] QLC 34
Unimin Australia Limited v Freeman [2007] QLC 76
Walker v Cook Shire Council [2015] QLC 19
Wills v Minerva Coal Pty Ltd [No.2] (1998) 19 QLCR 297
APPEARANCES: Not applicable
This proceeding concerns a referral to the Land Court by the Chief Executive, Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) pursuant to s 279(5) of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (MRA) for the determination of compensation in respect of the grant of Mining Lease 100068 (ML 100068).
Background
The applicants, Patrick Daniel Michael O’Shane and Hamish William Bergerson
(the miners) seek the grant of ML 100068 which is located approximately 9 km south-east of Laura within the Cook Shire local government area. Mapping data provided by DNRM indicates that 2.2 ha of ML 100068 is located within road reserve under the control of the Cook Shire Council (the respondent). The road reserve is more particularly described seg 8505025.
The specific Land Court reference and tenure details are set out as follows:
Court Reference Tenure ID Relevant Area Term Lease Purpose MRA248-16 100068 2.2 ha 15 years Gold/Tin
On 15 February 2016 a Certificate of Application for ML 100068 was issued by the Mineral Assessment Hub.
Relevant Legislation
Section 279 MRA provides that a mining lease shall not be granted or renewed unless an agreement in relation to compensation has been filed or, in the absence of such an agreement, a determination of compensation has been made by the Land Court. In this matter, no agreement has been lodged with DNRM and the matter has been referred to the Land Court for determination.
Section 281 MRA identifies the matters which must be considered by the Court when determining compensation. In particular, s 281(3)(a) provides that an owner of land is entitled to compensation for:
“(i) deprivation of possession of the surface of land of the owner;
(ii) diminution of the value of the land of the owner or any improvements…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read O'Shane v Cook Shire Council and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2016] QLC 77
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court were whether the compensation payable for the grant of a mining lease over land subject to a mining lease was properly determined and whether the absence of expert or valuation evidence was a bar to the determination of compensation. The court also needed to consider whether it could rely on previous court judgments to determine the compensation payable.
In determining the compensation payable, the court noted that there was no expert or valuation evidence before it. However, the court held that it was permissible to use previous court judgments to determine the compensation payable, as long as those judgments were applicable to the facts of the case. The court found that the previous judgments were applicable and used them to determine the compensation payable. The court held that the compensation payable was $495.00, which was significantly less than the amount sought by the respondent.
The court ordered that the applicants pay the respondent the sum of $495.00 within three months of the date of grant of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines. This decision highlights the importance of providing expert or valuation evidence in mining lease compensation cases, and the court's willingness to rely on previous judgments to determine compensation where necessary.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. In respect of ML 100068 compensation is determined in the total amount of $495.00.
2. That the applicants pay compensation to the respondent the amount set out in Order 1 within three months of the date of grant of the mining lease by Department of Natural Resources and Mines.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.