O'Donnell v Yam

Case

[2008] NSWLEC 1444

13 October 2008

No judgment structure available for this case.


Land and Environment Court


of New South Wales


CITATION: O’Donnell v Yam [2008] NSWLEC 1444
This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
PARTIES:

APPLICANT
Brendan O’Donnell

RESPONDENTS
Elseve Yam and Warren Yam
FILE NUMBER(S): 20843 of 2008
CORAM: Moore C
KEY ISSUES: Jurisdiction - Trees (Neighbours) :-
Tree removed prior to lodgment of application
No jurisdiction
LEGISLATION CITED: Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006
CASES CITED: Robson v Leischke [2008] NSWLEC 152; (2008) LGERA 280
DATES OF HEARING: 13 October 2008
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE: 13 October 2008
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:

APPLICANT
In person

RESPONDENTS
In person

JUDGMENT:

        THE LAND AND
        ENVIRONMENT COURT
        OF NEW SOUTH WALES

        MOORE C

        13 October 2008

        20843 of 2008 Brendan O’Donnell v Elseve Yam and Warren Yam


        JUDGMENT

        This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.

    1 COMMISSIONER : The tree that is the subject of the application was not in existence as at 19 August 2008, when Mr O’Donnell’s application was filed with the Court, as it had already been removed by Mr and Ms Yam.

    2 As a consequence, I am obliged, for the reasons discussed by Preston CJ in Robson v Leischke [2008] NSWLEC 152; (2008) LGERA 280 at para 144, to dismiss the application because, as there was no tree the subject of an application situated on the Yams’ land at the date the application was made, the Court does not have jurisdiction to entertain the application. The application is dismissed.

    Tim Moore
    Commissioner of the Court
03/11/2008 - Correction to date - Paragraph(s) Cover sheet
Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

1

Statutory Material Cited

1

Robson v Leischke [2008] NSWLEC 152