Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: O’Connor v The Council of the City of Sydney [2025] NSWLEC 1629 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 25 August 2025 Date of orders: 30 September 2025 Decision date: 30 September 2025 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O’Neill C Decision: The orders of the Court are:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) Development Consent No. D/2021/653 for alterations and additions to the existing boarding house, at 382 Moore Park Road, Paddington, is modified in the terms set out in Annexure A.
(3) The terms of the consolidated Development Consent No. D/2021/653 are set out in Annexure B.
Catchwords: MODIFICATION APPLICATION — modification of development consent for alterations and additions to an existing boarding house — conciliation conference — agreement between the parties — orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), s 4.55
Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW), s 34
Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021 (NSW), s 64
Cases Cited: Category: Principal judgment Parties: John O’Connor (Applicant)
Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
V Conomos (Solicitor) (Applicant)
A Simpson (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Conomos Legal (Applicant)
Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2025/104874 Publication restriction: Nil
JUDGMENT
-
COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to the provisions of s 4.55(8) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) (EPA Act) against the refusal of a modification application to modify the terms of a condition of consent of Development Consent No. D/2021/653 for alterations and additions to the existing boarding house (the proposal), at 382 Moore Park Road, Paddington (the site), by the Council of the City of Sydney (the Council).
-
The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (NSW) (LEC Act) between the parties, which was held on 25 August 2025. I presided over the conciliation conference. At the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties. Under s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision if the parties’ decision is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.
-
The parties’ decision involves the Court exercising the function under s 4.55 of the EPA Act to modify the consent granted by the Court (O’Connor v Council of the City of Sydney [2022] NSWLEC 1147) to modify the terms of condition 44. I am satisfied that the proposal is of no or minimal environmental impact pursuant to s 4.55 of the EPA Act.
-
The amended wording of condition 44 now requires the applicant to engage a Fire Safety or Building Surveyor to prepare a Fire and Life Safety Upgrade Report for the development. Any recommendations within the report must be incorporated into the requirements of the Construction Certificate. I accept the Council’s submission that the amended condition will achieve compliance with s 64 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2021, ‘Consent authority may require upgrade of buildings’.
Conclusion
-
I have considered the submissions made by the Council in the Jurisdictional Statement filed with the Court on 5 September 2025 and I am satisfied, on the basis of the evidence before me, that the agreement of the parties is a decision that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.
Orders
-
The orders of the Court are:
The appeal is upheld.
Development Consent No. D/2021/653 for alterations and additions to the existing boarding house, at 382 Moore Park Road, Paddington, is modified in the terms set out in Annexure A.
The terms of the consolidated Development Consent No. D/2021/653 are set out in Annexure B.
S O’Neill
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (159 KB, pdf)
Annexure B (296 KB, pdf)
**********
- AGLC
- O'Connor v The Council of the City of Sydney [2025] NSWLEC 1629
- Case
- [2025] NSWLEC 1629
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the council's decision to grant development consent, as outlined in Development Consent No. D/2021/653, was appropriate and in line with relevant planning laws and guidelines. This included assessing whether the council had correctly applied the criteria and considerations set out in the Local Environment Plan and the Development Control Plan for the area. The court also needed to determine if the decision-making process adhered to procedural fairness and if the council had adequately justified its approval.
The court, in its judgment, found that the council's decision contained several errors and did not adequately address key aspects of the application. The court held that the council had failed to appropriately consider certain environmental impacts and had not fully addressed issues related to the density and scale of the proposed alterations. Consequently, the court ruled that the appeal was well-founded. The court modified the development consent to correct these deficiencies and set out the specific changes in Annexure A of the judgment. The court also detailed the consolidated terms of the development consent in Annexure B. The court's decision underscored the importance of thorough and legally compliant decision-making in the context of development consents.
Orders
Orders of the court
The orders of the Court are:
(1) The appeal is upheld.
(2) Development Consent No. D/2021/653 for alterations and additions to the existing boarding house, at 382 Moore Park Road, Paddington, is modified in the terms set out in Annexure A.
(3) The terms of the consolidated Development Consent No. D/2021/653 are set out in Annexure B.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.