O'BRIEN v Glenidle Pty Ltd
[2015] FCCA 3438
•21 December 2015
FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| O'BRIEN v GLENIDLE PTY LTD | [2015] FCCA 3438 |
| Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – No appearance by the parties – application dismissed pursuant to r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001. |
| Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009, s.566 Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001, r.13.03C(1)(c) |
| Applicant: | MICHAEL WILLIAM O'BRIEN |
| Respondent: | GLENIDLE PTY LTD |
| File Number: | SYG 1863 of 2015 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Street |
| Hearing date: | 21 December 2015 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 21 December 2015 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 21 December 2015 |
REPRESENTATION
| No appearance by or on behalf of the Applicant |
| No appearance by or on behalf of the Respondent |
ORDERS
The application is dismissed pursuant to r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001.
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYG 1863 of 2015
| MICHAEL WILLIAM O'BRIEN |
Applicant
And
| GLENIDLE PTY LTD |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
This is a matter within the Court’s jurisdiction under s.566 of the Fair Work Act 2009. The matter was referred to mediation at the request of the parties and was listed for further directions on 6 November 2015. When the matter was called on 6 November 2015 there was no appearance by either party. Notwithstanding the failure of the parties to appear on that occasion, in light of the fact that the matter had been referred to mediation, the Court adjourned the matter to 21 December 2015. A copy of the directions as to the adjourned date was sent to the legal representatives of both parties, together with permission to appear, if they wished, by telephone.
On 24 November 2015, a Registrar of the Court noted that a mediation was held with the assistance of the Court and that the mediation had now successfully concluded. My associate contacted the applicant’s solicitor on 17 December 2015 to confirm that the matter remained listed for directions and that no notice of discontinuance had been filed. My associate was informed by the applicant’s solicitor that the matter had settled and that the applicant intended to file a notice of discontinuance. I am satisfied that the legal representatives for the parties were aware that the matter was listed today for directions. I am satisfied in the circumstances that this is an appropriate matter in which to exercise the Court’s powers under r.13.03C(1)(c) of the Federal Circuit Court Rules 2001. The application is dismissed.
I certify that the preceding two (2) paragraphs are a true copy of the reasons for judgment of Judge Street
Associate:
Date: 21 December 2015
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Civil Procedure
-
Negligence & Tort
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Duty of Care
-
Negligence
-
Causation
-
Damages
0
0
3