NWWJ
v
MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP, MIGRANT SERVICES AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS
[2021] HCASL 218
S110/2021
There is no reason to doubt the correctness of the decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia. Special leave to appeal should be refused. Accordingly, it would be futile to grant the extension of time that is sought.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
S.J Gageler J.S Gleeson 11 November 2021
- AGLC
- NWWJ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] HCASL 218
- Case
- [2021] HCASL 218
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The High Court considered whether the Full Court's decision was so plainly wrong that it ought to be reviewed by the High Court. The High Court found that there was no reason to doubt the correctness of the Full Court's decision, and that the Full Court had properly assessed the credibility of NWWJ's evidence and applied the correct legal principles to the character test. The High Court found that it would be futile to grant the extension of time sought by NWWJ, as there was no reasonable prospect that the appeal would succeed.
Accordingly, the High Court dismissed the application for special leave to appeal and directed the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application. The Full Court's decision that NWWJ was not a genuine temporary entrant and that he did not satisfy the character test stood affirmed. The High Court's decision emphasises the importance of properly assessing the credibility of evidence and applying the correct legal principles in visa cancellation cases.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.