Nuova Surry Hills v Sydney City Council

[2004] NSWLEC 335

Land and Environment Court

of New South Wales

CITATION:	Nuova Surry Hills v Sydney City Council [2004] NSWLEC 335
PARTIES:	APPLICANT Nuova Surry Hills RESPONDENT Sydney City Council
FILE NUMBER(S):	11316 of 2003
CORAM:	Talbot J
KEY ISSUES:	:-
LEGISLATION CITED:
CASES CITED:
DATES OF HEARING:	07/06/2004, 08/06/2004
DATE OF JUDGMENT:	06/08/2004
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:	APPLICANT Mr C McEwen (Barrister) SOLICITORS Staunton Beattie RESPONDENT Mr J Robson (Barrister) SOLICITORS Abbott Tout

JUDGMENT:

IN THE LAND AND

ENVIRONMENT COURT

OF NEW SOUTH WALES

11316 of 2003

Talbot J

8 June 2004

Nuova Surry Hills Pty Limited

Applicant
v

Sydney City Council

Respondent

Judgment

Introduction

1 HIS HONOUR: With considerable assistance from my associate and also with the benefit of advice from Commissioner Moore, I have been able to reach a decision and even to put the decision into a written form. I am confident that we have picked up any inherent clerical mistakes. If we have not that will come out in a revised edition but for the moment you can assume that this covers all of the matters that we intended to cover. Having considered both the written and oral evidence, the view of the site and submissions made on behalf of the respective parties, I have concluded that the overall level of amenity of the proposed development is unacceptable for the reasons that I set out in the judgment. Accordingly, the orders of the Court are that the appeal is dismissed. The development application, which I describe in the second order, is determined by the refusal of development consent and the exhibits may be returned. I publish the reasons and a copy will be available to you immediately. It may just take a few moments for the exhibits to be assembled for re-delivery but my associate will have them available to you in a short time.