FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nugawela v Dudley (Trustee) [2023] FCA 1603
Appeal from: Nugawela v Dudley (Trustee) (No 3) [2023] FCA 674 File number: WAD 162 of 2023 Judgment of: JACKSON J Date of judgment: 14 December 2023 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application for security for costs - consideration of prospects of success of appeal - orders for security would not stultify reasonably arguable appeal - appellant's impecuniosity - history of appellant's non-compliance with procedural directions - security for costs of appeal ordered Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 39.06, Schedule 3 Cases cited: Division: General Division Registry: Western Australia National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations Sub-area: General and Personal Insolvency Number of paragraphs: 34 Date of hearing: 14 December 2023 Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant did not appear Counsel for the Respondent: Mr C Touyz Solicitor for the Respondent: Greenstone Legal ORDERS
WAD 162 of 2023 BETWEEN: PATRICK ALLEN NUGAWELA
Appellant
AND: GREGORY BRUCE DUDLEY AS TRUSTEE FOR THE ESTATE OF PATRICK NUGAWELA
Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
JACKSON J
DATE OF ORDER:
14 DECEMBER 2023
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The appellant must provide security for the costs of the appeal in the sum of $50,000 by payment of that sum into the Court.
2.The appeal is stayed until the security required by paragraph 1 of these orders is provided.
3.The appellant has liberty to apply in relation to the manner of providing the security for costs.
4.If the security for costs in accordance with these orders as varied is not provided by 19 February 2024, then the appeal is dismissed.
5.By 4.00 pm AWST on 19 December 2023, the respondent must file and serve a bill of costs for the security for costs application.
6.By 4.00 pm AWST on 25 January 2024, the appellant may provide a written submission of no longer than 3 pages in length in response to the respondent's bill of costs.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
(edited from the transcript)JACKSON J:
On 20 June 2023 a judge of this Court dismissed an application made by Patrick Nugawela against his trustee in bankruptcy, Gregory Bruce Dudley. The application was dismissed on the basis of long delay by Dr Nugawela in complying with procedural directions made by the primary judge. During much of that delay, the proceeding had been stayed as a result of non‑compliance with procedural directions. Dr Nugawela has appealed from the dismissal order. The respondent, Mr Dudley, now seeks security for the costs of the appeal.
The proceeding before the primary judge
The background of the matter need not be set out in detail. Dr Nugawela's claim, as dismissed by the primary judge, concerned allegations that Mr Dudley should have assigned litigation against the Australian Taxation Office to him and should not have abandoned proceedings that Dr Nugawela…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Nugawela v Dudley (Trustee) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2023] FCA 1603
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The Court noted that Dr Nugawela's impecuniosity was a relevant factor in deciding whether to order security for costs. The Court also noted that Dr Nugawela's non-compliance with procedural directions was a relevant factor in deciding whether to order security for costs. The Court considered that the orders for security for costs would not stultify a reasonably arguable appeal. The Court found that the appeal had a reasonable prospect of success and that the orders for security for costs would not stultify a reasonably arguable appeal. The Court ordered that Dr Nugawela provide security for the costs of the appeal in the sum of $50,000 by payment of that sum into the Court. The appeal is stayed until the security required by paragraph 1 of these orders is provided. If the security for costs in accordance with these orders as varied is not provided by 19 February 2024, then the appeal is dismissed.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The appellant must provide security for the costs of the appeal in the sum of $50,000 by payment of that sum into the Court.
2. The appeal is stayed until the security required by paragraph 1 of these orders is provided.
3. The appellant has liberty to apply in relation to the manner of providing the security for costs.
4. If the security for costs in accordance with these orders as varied is not provided by 19 February 2024, then the appeal is dismissed.
5. By 4.00 pm AWST on 19 December 2023, the respondent must file and serve a bill of costs for the security for costs application.
6. By 4.00 pm AWST on 25 January 2024, the appellant may provide a written submission of no longer than 3 pages in length in response to the respondent's bill of costs.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.