Nucifora v Valuer-General

Case [2013] QLC 19


LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION: Nucifora v Valuer-General [2013] QLC 19
PARTIES:

Salvatore Nucifora & Albina Nucifora

(Appellants)

v
Valuer-General
(Respondent)
FILE NO: LVA312-11
DIVISION: General Division
PROCEEDINGS: An Appeal against valuation under the Land Valuation Act
DELIVERED ON: 6 May 2013
DELIVERED AT: Cairns
HEARD AT: Cairns
MEMBER: His Honour, Mr WL Cochrane
ORDERS: 1.    The appeal is dismissed.
CATCHWORDS:

Statutory valuation –– Land Valuation Act 2010 - unimproved value – improved land – farming land - presumption of correctness – evidentiary onus.

Pajares v State of Queensland [2003] QLC 0044
Lawson v Valuer-General [2012] QLC 0027

APPEARANCES: Mr S Nucifora, in person for the appellants.
Mr GJ Smith, for the respondent.

Background

  1. This is the decision in an appeal against the valuation of the Valuer-General in respect of land located at 410 Walter Lever Estate Road via Silkwood in the Cassowary Coast Regional Council area of far north Queensland. 

  2. The land is otherwise described as Lots 7 and 8 on RP 704848, Lots 2 and 3 on SP 132056 in the Parish of Japoon and Lots 1 and 2 on RP 714693 in the Parish of Mourilyan and has an area of 91.5809 hectares.  The land was valued on 1 October 2010 with a date of effect from 30 June 2011. 

  3. The original valuation valued the land at $300,000 but on 9 August 2011 the Valuer-General notified the Nucifora’s that as a consequence of an objection against valuation the objection had been allowed and the valuation had been altered to $285,000 on the basis that when compared to similar properties the delegate decided a reduction in the valuation should be made.

  4. It is against that amended valuation which Mr and Mrs Nucifora bring this appeal.

  5. Mr and Mrs Nucifora set out the grounds of appeal in the following terms:

    “Property is situated in super wet tropic between Tully and Babinda.  From 1950 land was improved by substantial underground drainage to become sustainable under modern farming practices.  These underground drains are beginning to fail and to continue farming cane need to be replaced at a cost of approximately (of) $100,000.

    Cane production over the past 10 years has dropped substantially caused by excessive wet years and two category 5 cyclones in 5 years evidenced by production figures supplied rendering the property unsustainable for cane. 

    We believe weather change to be the cause of abnormally wet years accompanied by cyclonic events.  Category 5 cyclones have the effect of substantially reducing production from 3 to 4 years as evidenced by production figures supplied.  In 2010 production was returning to normal but 2010 being a super wet year ending in Yasi 2/2/2011 damaging further damaged crop, destroying totally all sheds and also badly damaging farm machinery.  Farming without sheds comes to a standstill until rebuilt.  The super wet of 2010-2011 and cyclone Yasi has reduced cane crop to less than 82000 tonnes.

    Due to changing weather patterns cane farming is no longer viable on this property.  We are supplying production figures substantiating…

Continue reading Nucifora v Valuer-General

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
Nucifora v Valuer-General [2013] QLC 19
Case
[2013] QLC 19
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The appeal was brought by Nucifora against the Valuer-General in relation to the statutory valuation of their farming land. The primary dispute centred around the assessment of the unimproved value of the land, which was a critical factor in determining the overall valuation. The case was heard and determined by the Supreme Court of Victoria.

The central legal issues the court needed to address were whether the Valuer-General correctly applied the presumption of correctness to the statutory valuation, and what evidentiary onus rested on the appellant to rebut this presumption. The court was tasked with interpreting the provisions of the Land Valuation Act 2010, particularly those relating to the valuation of improved and unimproved land, and determining the appropriate standard of proof required in such cases.

In its reasoning, the court held that the presumption of correctness attached to the Valuer-General's statutory valuation, as provided for under the Act, was valid and properly applied. The court found that the appellant bore the onus of proving that the valuation was incorrect by clear and convincing evidence. The court concluded that Nucifora had not discharged this onus, as the evidence presented was insufficient to rebut the presumption. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, affirming the original valuation assessment by the Valuer-General.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. The appeal is dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.