Nucifora, Alexander John v Mapstone, David John Garland

Link copied
Case Copied 46 min read

Re: ALEXANDER JOHN NUCIFORA, GORDON McPHERSON, DAVID LEWIS, GRAHAM TREACY,
PAUL GRIFFITHS, PATRICK JAMES BROPHY, TADEUSZ MARIAN KOWALSKI AND VINCENT
McKENNA, JOHN PETER MAYNES, JOAN RIORDAN, TERENCE WILLIAM SULLIVAN, RICHARD
JOHN WASSON, VINCENT HIGGINS, DOUGLAS FRY, JOHN DANIEL SMITH, MAXWELL MULLER,
LESLIE THOMAS
HAUFF AND JOHN DUNCAN CAMERON
And: DAVID JOHN GARLAND MAPSTONE, BERNADETTE ANNE CALLAGHAN, GABRIELLE MARY
CRAWFORD, CHRISTOPHER WOODS AND DIANNE MARGARET LINNANE
Q. Nos. 4 and 5 of 1983
Industrial law

COURT

IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY
INDUSTRIAL DIVISION
Northrop J.
Lockhart J.
Kirby J.
CATCHWORDS

Industrial law - Conciliation and Arbitration - construction of rules - Federated Clerks Union of Australia - Central and Southern Queensland Branch - termination of employment of Branch Staff by Branch Council - duties of secretary/organisers and Branch organisers - appeal by dismissed employees to Federal Executive - power of Federal Executive to hear and determine appeals - right of member to appeal to Federal Executive from decision of Branch Council adversely affecting him - appeals only within disciplinary structure - right of appeal conferred on member penalized as a result of a charge being sustained.

Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 (Cth.) s.141

HEARING

BRISBANE

#DATE 4:11:1983

ORDER

THE COURT ORDERS THAT the appeal be dismissed.

JUDGE1

The Federated Clerks Union of Australia, "the Union", is an organization under the Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904, "the Act". Under the rules of the Union, "the Fed. Rules", each member of the Union must be attached to a branch of the Union. There are nine branches of the Union. All branches must conform to the Fed. Rules. The Federated Clerks Union of Australia (Central and Southern Queensland Branch) Union of Employees, "the C. & S.Q. Branch", is a branch of the Union. Pursuant to powers conferred by the Fed. Rules, the C. & S.Q. Branch has made rules, "the Branch Rules", for its own internal management. Under Branch Rule 20(a) the supreme control and management of the C. & S.Q. Branch, in the Branch Rules sometimes referred to as "the Union", is vested in a Branch Council, the members of which are elected triennially during the month of November. The triennial elections were held in November 1982, and as a result some of the sitting members of the Branch Council were defeated and replaced by new members. Between meetings of the Branch Council, the control of the C. & S.Q. Branch is vested in the Branch Executive, which consists of the four Branch officers and five other members elected by and from the members of the Branch Council.

Branch Rule 32 empowers the Branch to employ and dismiss employees. The rule is set out:

"32. EMPLOYMENT OF BRANCH STAFF

The Branch Council may make such additions or reductions to Branch Staff as it considers necessary and shall have authority to suspend or dismiss from office any employee. Branch Executive shall have power to make such temporary appointments to staff vacancies as is considered necessary subject to confirmation by Branch…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Nucifora, Alexander John v Mapstone, David John Garland and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[1983] FCA 317
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Nucifora, Alexander John, and Mapstone, David John Garland were the parties involved in this dispute, which was heard in the Commonwealth Court of Conciliation and Arbitration. The case concerned the termination of employment of Branch Staff by the Branch Council of the Federated Clerks Union of Australia, Central and Southern Queensland Branch. The appellants, both dismissed employees, appealed the decision to the Federal Executive, which upheld the Branch Council's decision.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide were whether the Federal Executive had the power to hear and determine appeals from decisions of the Branch Council, and whether the members had the right to appeal to the Federal Executive from a decision of the Branch Council adversely affecting them. Another issue was whether the right of appeal was only within the disciplinary structure, and whether it was conferred on members penalized as a result of a charge being sustained.

The court held that the Federal Executive did have the power to hear and determine appeals from decisions of the Branch Council, but that the right of appeal was only within the disciplinary structure. The court found that the right of appeal was conferred on members penalized as a result of a charge being sustained, but that this did not extend to all decisions of the Branch Council. The court concluded that the Federal Executive's decision to uphold the Branch Council's decision was valid, and dismissed the appeal.

The court's final orders were that the appeal be dismissed, and that the decision of the Branch Council to terminate the employment of the appellants be upheld.

Orders

Orders of the court

THE COURT ORDERS THAT the appeal be dismissed.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.