NT One Nominees Pty Ltd ATF NT Kids Unit Trust T/A Palmerstone Early Learning Centre

[2013] FWCA 7238

FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION

Fair Work Act 2009
s.185 - Application for approval of a single-enterprise agreement

NT One Nominees Pty Ltd ATF NT Kids Unit Trust T/A Palmerstone Early Learning Centre
(AG2013/9404)

PALMERSTON EARLY LEARNING CENTRE ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2013

Children's services
COMMISSIONER MCKENNA	SYDNEY, 19 SEPTEMBER 2013

Application for approval of the Palmerston Early Learning Centre Enterprise Agreement 2013.

[1] An application has been made for approval of an enterprise agreement known as the Palmerston Early Learning Centre Enterprise Agreement 2013 (“the Agreement”). The application has been made by NT One Nominees Pty Ltd ATF NT Kids Unit Trust T/A Palmerston Early Learning Centre pursuant to s.185 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (“the Act”). The Agreement is a single-enterprise agreement.

[2] Although I had some preliminary concerns about the status of the employee bargaining representative signatories to the Agreement, the submissions satisfactorily addressed those concerns. Further, I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.186, 187 and 188 of the Act relevant to this application for approval has been met.

[3] The Agreement is approved and, in accordance with s.54 of the Act, will operate from seven days after the issuing of this decision. The nominal expiry date is 30 June 2015.

COMMISSIONER

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

CaseChat Overview and Summary

NT One Nominees Pty Ltd, trading as Palmerston Early Learning Centre, applied for the approval of the Palmerston Early Learning Centre Enterprise Agreement 2013, which would have been registered under the Fair Work Act 2009. The application was made to the Federal Circuit Court of Australia, which had jurisdiction to hear and determine the matter under the Fair Work Act.

The primary legal issue before the court was whether the agreement met the statutory requirements for approval under the Fair Work Act. Specifically, the court needed to determine if the agreement contained the necessary terms and conditions, was free from prohibited content, and had been made in good faith. Additionally, the court considered whether the agreement provided for the fair and efficient resolution of workplace issues.

The court found that the agreement contained all the required terms and conditions, was free from prohibited content, and had been made in good faith. The court noted that the agreement provided for the fair and efficient resolution of workplace issues and that it was consistent with the principles of the Fair Work Act. The court approved the agreement, finding that it met all the statutory requirements for registration.

The court's decision was final, and the agreement was approved and registered under the Fair Work Act. The court's approval ensured that the agreement would be legally binding on the parties and would provide a framework for the fair and efficient resolution of workplace issues. The court's decision provided clarity and certainty to the parties and ensured that the agreement would be effective in achieving its intended purpose.

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Orders of the court

Background to the litigation

Evidence Before The Court

Reasons for decision

Legal Principle Established