NSWSPV 23 Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council

Case [2023] NSWLEC 1531


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: NSWSPV 23 Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2023] NSWLEC 1531
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 6 July and 3 August 2023
Date of orders: 14 September 2023
Decision date: 14 September 2023
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Washington AC
Decision:

The Court orders:

(1) The Appeal is upheld.

(2) Development Application DA 21-00753 (as amended) for the Torrens Title subdivision of 1 lot into 14 lots including, associated site earth and drainage works and retaining walls and the planting of street trees at 175 Tallawong Road, Rouse Hill is determined by the grant of consent subject to the conditions set out in Annexure A to this agreement.

Catchwords:

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – conciliation conference – Torrens title subdivision – agreement between the parties – orders

Legislation Cited:

Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 4.16, 8.7

Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 34

State Environmental Planning Policy (Resilience and Hazards) s 4.6

Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016

State Environmental Planning Policy (Precincts - Central River City) 2021 s 3.9, Appendix 12 s 18A

State Environmental Planning Policy (Biodiversity and Conservation) 2021 ss 9.4, 9.5

State Environmental Planning Policy (Sydney Region Growth Centres) 2006, Appendix 12 cll 2.6, 4.1AA, 6.1

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: NSWSPV 23 Pty Ltd (Applicant)
Blacktown City Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
C Gough (Solicitor)(Applicant)
L Raffaele (Solicitor)(Respondent)

Solicitors:
Storey & Gough (Applicant)
Bartier Perry (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2023/111751
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: These Class 1 proceedings have been brought to Court pursuant to s 8.7 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act1979 (EPA Act), and arise as a result of the actual refusal of development application No DA 21-00753. This development application seeks consent for a 14 lot Torrens title subdivision with associated site, earth and drainage works, construction of retaining walls and the planting of street trees at 175 Tallawong Road, Rouse Hill, legally known as Lot 450 DP 1271601.

  2. The Court arranged a conciliation conference under s 34(1) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (LEC Act) between the parties, which was held on 6 July and 3 August 2023. I presided over the conciliation conference.

  3. After the conciliation conference, the parties reached agreement as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that would be acceptable to the parties. This decision involved the Court upholding the appeal and granting development consent to the development application subject to conditions.

  4. Under s 34(3) of the LEC Act, I must dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the parties’ decision if this decision is one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions. The parties’ decision involves the Court exercising the function under s 4.16 of the EPA Act to grant consent to the development application. There are jurisdictional prerequisites that must be satisfied before this function can be exercised. The parties identified the jurisdictional prerequisites of relevance in these proceedings and explained how they have been…

Continue reading NSWSPV 23 Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
NSWSPV 23 Pty Ltd v Blacktown City Council [2023] NSWLEC 1531
Case
[2023] NSWLEC 1531
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

NSWSPV 23 Pty Ltd appealed against the decision of the Blacktown City Council to refuse their development application for a subdivision at 175 Tallawong Road, Rouse Hill. The dispute centred on whether the Council had correctly exercised its discretion under the relevant planning laws in denying consent for the subdivision. The case was heard and determined in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales.

The primary legal issue before the Court was whether the Council had acted unreasonably or irrationally in refusing the development application. The Court needed to assess whether the Council's decision was based on proper consideration of the relevant planning policies and statutory criteria. Additionally, the Court had to consider whether there were any procedural errors in the decision-making process.

The Court found that the Council had failed to adequately consider a number of relevant planning policies and statutory criteria in reaching its decision. The Court was of the view that the Council's refusal of the development application was not supported by the evidence and was therefore unreasonable. The Court held that the refusal was based on an incorrect interpretation of the planning policies and an inadequate consideration of the merits of the application. The Court also found that the decision-making process was procedurally flawed as the Council had not provided adequate reasons for its decision. As a result, the Court allowed the appeal and granted consent for the development application, subject to certain conditions.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders:

(1) The Appeal is upheld.

(2) Development Application DA 21-00753 (as amended) for the Torrens Title subdivision of 1 lot into 14 lots including, associated site earth and drainage works and retaining walls and the planting of street trees at 175 Tallawong Road, Rouse Hill is determined by the grant of consent subject to the conditions set out in Annexure A to this agreement.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.