NSW Police v Smith

Case [2016] NSWLC 24


Local Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: NSW Police v Smith [2016] NSWLC 24
Hearing dates:21 October 2016
Decision date: 07 December 2016
Jurisdiction:Criminal
Before: Mulroney ALCM
Decision:

Application for the charges to be diverted with under s 32, Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act refused.
Application for the charges regarding an event in 2014 to be permanently stayed refused.

Catchwords: CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS – mental health – application for diversion – application for permanent stay of proceedings
Legislation Cited: Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990, ss 32, 33
Cases Cited: DPP v El Mawas [2006] NSWCA 154
Jago v District Court of NSW [1989] HCA 46; (1989) 168 CLR 23
Mantell v Molyneux [2006] NSWSC 955
Police v AR 2010 CLN 1
R v Drummond (unreported, NSW Court of Criminal Appeal, 27/5/94)
R v Presser [1958] VR 45
Category:Procedural and other rulings
Parties: NSW Police (prosecution)
Mark Smith (defendant)
Representation: Solicitors:
Mr Nicholas (for the prosecution)
Mr Heenan (for the defendant)
File Number(s):2015/44766, 2016/262928

Judgment

Introduction

  1. Mark Smith was born in 1976. In 2004 Mr Smith suffered a stroke whilst driving a car. During treatment for the stroke scans revealed an arterio-venous malformation (AVM) on his brain. Treatment of this required serious surgery on his brain. The result of the brain surgery was organic brain damage that has resulted in neurological and neurocognitive deficits. [1]

    1. Dr Margaret Pickles, report 7 August 2015

  2. Mr Smith has required ongoing treatment for these conditions from a team of specialists including a neurosurgeon, a neurologist and a forensic psychiatrist.

  3. During the period since 2004 Mr Smith has been charged with various offences. For a number of these matters he has been found not guilty. A number of the matters have been dealt with under the provisions of what is now the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act 1990.

  4. Mr Smith joined the New South Wales Police Force in 1997. He attained the rank of Senior Constable. A report from Dr Pickles states that he was dismissed in 2007 but that there are ongoing proceedings challenging this decision.

The Present Charges

  1. Two sets of charges are for determination. The first set relate to events on 3 December 2014 and involve two charges of Common Assault and one of Damaging Property (the 2014 charges). The second set involves a charge of Common Assault arising from events on 27 December 2015 (the 2015 charge).

The 2014 charges – facts

  1. Mr Smith caught a taxi at 6.30am from Surry Hills to a hotel in Phillip St, Sydney. He had a dispute with the driver over the fare. He then became aggressive toward the driver and said, amongst other things, “go back to where you came from”. Whilst still in the taxi he pushed the driver to the chest on three occasions. He rummaged in parts of the taxi and took a phone charger. He was requested to leave the taxi and refused. He threw a bottle of water at the driver. While exiting…

Continue reading NSW Police v Smith

Sign in free to access the full text

Details
AGLC
NSW Police v Smith [2016] NSWLC 24
Case
[2016] NSWLC 24
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The parties involved in this case were the NSW Police, acting as the prosecution, and the defendant, Smith. Smith was facing criminal charges, and the dispute centred around whether these charges should be diverted under the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act or permanently stayed. The matter was heard in the relevant court, which is not specified in the text.

The court was tasked with deciding two primary legal issues. The first was whether the charges against Smith should be diverted under section 32 of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act. The second issue was whether the charges related to an event in 2014 should be permanently stayed. Both decisions were based on the assessment of Smith's mental health and its impact on his ability to participate in the criminal proceedings.

In delivering its decision, the court considered the evidence and submissions presented. It found that there were insufficient grounds to support a diversion of the charges under section 32 of the Act. Additionally, the court concluded that there were no compelling reasons to permanently stay the charges regarding the 2014 event. The reasoning provided by the court indicated that Smith's mental health, while a factor, did not warrant the requested outcomes.

Consequently, the court refused both applications. The application for the charges to be diverted under section 32 of the Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act was refused. Similarly, the application for the charges concerning the 2014 event to be permanently stayed was also refused.

Orders

Orders of the court

Application for the charges to be diverted with under s 32, Mental Health (Forensic Provisions) Act refused.

Application for the charges regarding an event in 2014 to be permanently stayed refused.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.