NSW Admission Board Rules 2015 (NSW)

Erratum

The NSW Admission Board Rules 2015 were published on LW 26 June 2015 (2015 No 353). These

Rules were published with missing provisions. The correct Rules are now published in full below.

NSW Admission Board Rules 2015
Part 1Preliminary
1

(1) These Rules are made by the Legal Profession Admission Board under section 21A of the Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014.

(2) These Rules may be cited as the NSW Admission Board Rules 2015.

2 These Rules succeed the Legal Profession Admission Rules 2005 with effect from 1

July 2015.

3 These Rules are divided into Parts as follows:

Part 1—Preliminary, rules 1–6
Part 2—Administration, rules 7–14
Part 3—Legal Qualifications Committee, rules 15–26
Part 3A—Examinations Committee, rules 27–27K
Part 4—Students-at-Law, rules 28–36
Part 5—Repealed
Part 6— Repealed
Part 6A— Repealed
Part 7—Examinations, rules 46–78A
Part 8—Certificates, rules 79–81
Part 9—Discipline, rules 82–88
Part 10—Hearings, rules 89–93
Part 11—Exemptions, rules 97-98
Part 11B— Repealed
Part 12—Fees, rules 109–113
Part 13—Transitional, rules 113A–115

Part 14—Miscellaneous, rules 116–118

4 In these Rules, unless the context or subject matter otherwise indicates or requires:

Act means the Legal Profession Uniform Law Application Act 2014.

Approved forms means forms approved by the Board.

Bar Association means the New South Wales Bar Association.

Board means the New South Wales Legal Profession Admission Board.

Board’s examinations means the examinations set out in these Rules.

Court means the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

Examinations Committee means the Committee established under these Rules to oversee the content and conduct of the Board’s examinations and the candidature of students-at-law.

Executive Officer means the person appointed as Executive Officer to the Board under rule 7.

graduate means a person who has taken a degree after examination at any

university considered by the Board to be of good standing.

Judge means a Judge or Associate Judge of the Court.

Law Extension Committee means the Law Extension Committee of the University of Sydney.

law school means an educational facility conducted by a tertiary educational
authority which has as one of its aims the production of graduates eligible to be

admitted as lawyers inside or outside of New South Wales.

Law Society means The Law Society of New South Wales.

Legal Qualifications Committee means the Committee established under these Rules to superintend the qualification of candidates for admission and to advise the Board in relation to the accreditation of academic and practical training

courses.

Uniform Law means the Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW).

Uniform Rules means the Legal Profession Uniform Admission Rules 2015.

Rules means the NSW Admission Board Rules 2015.

prescribed fee means a fee set out in the Third Schedule.

Presiding Member means the presiding member of the Board determined, nominated or elected in accordance with Schedule 3 of the Act.

student-at-law means a person registered as such under these rules Part 4.

5 Unless the context or subject matter otherwise indicates or requires, the definitions in the Act, Uniform Law and Uniform Rules, applies to these Rules.

6 (Repealed)
Part 2 Administration

7

(1) The Board shall appoint an Executive Officer.

(2) The Executive Officer shall either in person or by deputy approved by the President

attend all meetings of the Board, keep minutes of its proceedings, conduct its

correspondence and perform such other duties as the Board may require.

8

The Executive Officer shall keep the Board aware of the financial position of the comply with the Public Finance and Audit Act 1983.

(1) The Board shall have a seal.

(2) The seal may be affixed to any document or certificate issued by the Board under the

hand of the Chief Justice, the President, another judicial member of the Board or the

Executive Officer.

10 (Repealed)

11 The Board may adjourn consideration of an application or matter before it under

these Rules pending the provision of such further material or evidence as it
considers necessary or appropriate.

12 The Board may inform itself of any matter which it considers relevant to an

application before it in any manner it thinks appropriate, but the Board shall not
determine an application adversely to an applicant on material not supplied by the

applicant without first giving notice of the material to the applicant.

13

(1) Subject to the provisions of the Act, the Board, the Legal Qualifications Committee or

the Examinations Committee may, in circumstances which it regards as sufficiently
special and upon such conditions as it thinks fit, relax any of these Rules.

(2) An application for relaxation of the Rules shall be made through the Executive

Officer not less than 14 days before the meeting at which the application is to be considered.

(3) Without derogating from the generality of sub-rule (1), the Board may relax any of the rules relating to the registration as a student-at-law.

(4) An application for relaxation of any of the rules relating to students-at-law may be made together with a corresponding application for registration.

14

(1) Every applicant for registration as a student-at law shall, if required by the Board,

provide answers to such questions as the Board may put relating to his or her conduct,
and shall if required attend the Board for the purpose of providing further
explanations.

(2) If an applicant fails to provide answers within one month of being required to do so, or fails to attend the Board as required, the Board may, without further notice, refuse the application.

Part 3Legal Qualifications Committee

15 The Legal Qualifications Committee is hereby constituted to superintend the

qualification of candidates for admission and to advise the Board in relation to the

accreditation of academic and practical training courses.

16

(1) The Legal Qualifications Committee shall consist of the following persons:
(a) three Judges nominated by the Chief Justice,
(b) three Barristers nominated by the Bar Council,
(c) three Solicitors nominated by the Law Society Council, and

(d) three Professors of Law or full-time Law Lecturers nominated by the Committee of NSW Law Deans.

(2) The Legal Qualifications Committee may, by co-option, appoint up to three further

members being persons who are or have been Judges, Barristers, Solicitors, Legal
Practitioners, Lawyers, Professors of Law or full-time Law Lecturers.

(3) The person or body responsible for an appointment or nomination under this rule may vary that appointment or nomination.

17 Nominations under rule 16 shall be made to the Executive Officer.

18

(1) The term of office of a member of the Legal Qualifications Committee shall normally

be from 1 July of an even numbered year to 30 June of the next even numbered year.

(2) All positions become vacant on 30 June of an even numbered year.

(3) Members may be re-nominated for subsequent terms.

19 The Legal Qualifications Committee shall elect:

(a) as its Chairperson a Judge appointed under rule 16 (1) (a), and

(b) a Deputy Chairperson to exercise all the powers of the Chairperson when the Chairperson is absent.

20 The Executive Officer shall be the Executive Officer of the Legal Qualifications Committee.

21 Five members shall constitute a quorum of the Legal Qualifications Committee.

22 The Legal Qualifications Committee shall appoint an Academic Exemptions Sub- Committee of up to three members to determine applications under Uniform Rules 11(1), 5(2) and rule 97.

23 The Legal Qualifications Committee shall appoint a Practical Training

Exemptions Sub-Committee of up to three members to determine applications under Uniform Rules 11(2), 6(4) and rule 98.

23A (Repealed)

24 The Legal Qualifications Committee shall appoint an Accreditation Sub-

Committee of up to three members to make recommendations relating to the recognition and accreditation of courses under Uniform Rules 7 and 8.

25 The Legal Qualifications Committee may delegate to its Chairperson, a member,

several members, the Executive Officer or any combination of the foregoing the
making of a decision or decisions on any matter or class of matters, provided
always that a person aggrieved by a decision of a delegate on any matter may
apply for a reconsideration of the matter by the Legal Qualifications Committee.

26 The Legal Qualifications Committee is accountable to the Board and shall report

to the Board at least once in each calendar year as to its activities, including in its
report any proposals the Committee may wish to make about the Rules,
procedures or other matters relating to the Committee’s work.

Part 3AExaminations Committee

27 The Examinations Committee is hereby constituted to oversee the content and

conduct of the Board’s examinations and the candidatures of students-at-law.

27A

(1) The Examinations Committee shall consist of the following persons:
(a) two Judges nominated by the Chief Justice,
(b) one Barrister nominated by the Bar Council,
(c) one Solicitor nominated by the Law Society Council,
(d) the Director of the Law Extension Committee, and
(e) two Examiners appointed by the Chairperson of the Examinations Committee.

(2) The Examinations Committee may, by co-option, appoint up to two further members

being persons who are or have been Judges, Barristers, Solicitors, Legal Practitioners,
Lawyers, Professors of Law or full-time Law Lecturers.

(3) The person or body responsible for an appointment or nomination under this rule may vary that appointment or nomination.

27B Nominations under rule 27A shall be made to the Executive Officer.

27C

(1) The term of office of a member of the Examinations Committee shall normally be

from 1 July of an even numbered year to 30 June of the next even numbered year.

(2) All positions become vacant on 30 June of an even numbered year.

(3) Members may be re-nominated for subsequent terms.

27D The Examinations Committee shall elect:

(a) as its Chairperson a Judge appointed under rule 27A (1) (a), and

(b) a Deputy Chairperson to exercise all the powers of the Chairperson when the Chairperson is absent.

27E The Executive Officer shall be the Executive Officer of the Examinations

Committee.

27F Four members shall constitute a quorum of the Examinations Committee.

27G The Examinations Committee shall appoint a Performance Review Sub-

Committee of up to three members to determine applications under rule 67.

27H The Examinations Committee shall appoint a Curriculum Sub-Committee of up to three members:

(a)	to plan and periodically review, in consultation with Examiners and Revising Examiners, the curriculum and syllabi for the Board’s examinations, and
(b)	to prescribe materials on which the Board’s examinations may be set.

27I The Examinations Committee shall appoint a Quality Sub-Committee of up to

three members to oversee the quality of the Board’s examinations and the marking

of examination papers.

27J

(1) The Examinations Committee shall in the name of the Board appoint such Examiners and Revising Examiners as are required to set and mark the Board’s examinations.

(2) Every appointment under sub-rule (1) shall, unless otherwise specified, be for a single examination period.

(3) The Examinations Committee may delegate to its Chairperson, a member, several

members, the Executive Officer or any combination of the foregoing the making of a
decision on any particular matter or class of matters, provided always that a person
aggrieved by a decision of a delegate on any matter may apply for a reconsideration
of the matter by the Examinations Committee.

27K The Examinations Committee is accountable to the Board and shall report to the Board at least once in each calendar year as to its activities, including in its report any proposals the Committee may wish to make about the Rules, procedures or other matters relating to the Committee’s work.

---

Part 4Students-at-law

28 An application for registration as a student-at-law shall be in a form approved by
the Board.

29 A person is eligible to apply for registration as a student-at-law if he or she intends

to remain in Australia during the whole of his or her candidature for the Board’s
examinations and:

(a) has passed the Special Tertiary Admissions Test (STAT MC or STAT T) with a mark of 149 or above,

(b) is a graduate,

(c)	has completed the NSW Higher School Certificate achieving the levels set out in the following table:
Years Minimum Level Minimum English mark calculated as an average of HSC examination and assessment marks
Before 1986 Aggregate of 253 2 Unit General/2 Unit A 60

2 Unit 53

1986–1990	TES of 253	2 Unit General	60
2 Unit	53
1990–1999	TER of 50	2 Unit Contemporary	60
2 Unit Related/General	53
1999–2000	UAI of 66	2 Unit Contemporary	60
2 Unit Related/General	53
2001–2008	UAI of 66	Standard/Advanced	60
ESL	70
2009–	ATAR of 68.90	Standard/Advanced	60
ESL	70

(d)	has completed the equivalent of the NSW Higher School Certificate examination in Australia or New Zealand, achieving a level equivalent to one of the levels set out in the table in paragraph (c),
(e)	holds a Graduate Certificate/Vocational Graduate Certificate, Graduate Diploma/Vocational Graduate Diploma, an associate degree, advanced diploma, diploma, or associate diploma from an Australian university or TAFE college,
(f)	has passed the International Baccalaureate examination with a result of 30 points or more and a result in English A of at least 4 points at the Higher Level or 5 points at the Standard level,
(g)	has been admitted to candidature for a degree in an Australian or New Zealand university,
(h)	has qualified in a TAFE college or elsewhere for the award of a Certificate III or Certificate IV as assessed by the Australian Qualifications Framework,

(i) has gained qualifications outside Australia equivalent to a Diploma, Advanced Diploma, Certificate III or Certificate IV,

(j)	has been employed as a paralegal or a legal secretary undertaking actual legal work under supervision for at least three years, or
(k)	has been or is either a police officer or a registered nurse who has passed examinations in either of those professions.

30

(1) Subject to sub-rules (2) and (4), where the Board is satisfied that an applicant for

registration as a student-at-law is eligible for registration it shall register the applicant
as a student-at-law.

(2) The Board may refuse to register an applicant if it is not satisfied that he or she is of good fame and character and otherwise suitable for registration.
(3) In considering whether an applicant is suitable for registration, the Board may have regard to matters set out in Uniform Rule 10.

(4) The Board may refuse to register an applicant if it is not satisfied that the applicant

intends to reside in Australia during his or her candidature for the Board’s
examinations.

31

(1) The Executive Officer shall notify an applicant for registration as a student-at-law of

the outcome of his or her application as soon as practicable after the meeting at which
the application is considered.

(2) If the Board refuses to register an applicant, he or she may ask the Board to give reasons for the refusal.

(3) An applicant who is aggrieved by a refusal of an application may ask the Board to

reconsider the application, and may request an oral hearing before a committee of the
Board.

32–36 (Repealed) Part 5 (Repealed) Part 6 (Repealed) Part 7 Examinations

46 The Board’s Examinations shall be held twice each year at such places and times as the Board shall appoint.

47 Only students-at-law shall sit for the Board’s Examinations.

48–52 (Repealed)

53 The Board’s examinations are:

(a) the following subjects:

Legal Institutions

Contracts
Torts
Criminal Law and Procedure
Real Property
Australian Constitutional Law
Equity
Commercial Transactions
Administrative Law
Law of Associations
Evidence
Taxation and Revenue Law
Succession
Conveyancing
Practice and Procedure
Legal Ethics

Jurisprudence

(b) three of the following subjects:

Insolvency
Conflict of Laws
Family Law
Local Government and Planning
Industrial Law
Intellectual Property Law
Public International Law
Competition and Consumer Law

Understanding Legal Language and Legislation

54

(1) The Examinations Committee may recommend to the Board:
(a) a variation of the list of examinations and subjects set out in rule 53,
(b) a variation in the order in which the subjects are to be taken, and

(c) any transitional arrangements which may be necessary to accommodate a variation of the subjects or the order in which they are taken.

(2) The Board may approve a recommendation under sub-rule (1), with or without

amendment, refuse to approve the recommendation, or remit it to the Examinations
Committee for further consideration.

55 Upon the Board accepting a recommendation under rule 54, the list of

examinations shall be deemed varied as and from the next set of examinations,
without the necessity for any amendment of rule 53, and thereafter the

examinations as varied shall constitute the Board’s examinations.

56, 57 (Repealed)
58

(1) No student-at-law whose application for registration as a student-at-law is lodged later than 1 March in any year shall sit for the Legal Institutions examination in September of that year.

(2) No student-at-law whose application for registration as a student-at-law is lodged later than 1 September in any year shall sit for the Legal Institutions examination in March of the succeeding year.

59

(1) A student-at-law who has not passed the examinations in or been credited with or

exempted from at least 11 subjects must sit for the examination in the order in which
they appear in rule 53 or in any variation thereof under rule 55.

(2) A student-at-law who has passed the examinations in or been credited with or

exempted from at least 11 subjects may sit for the examinations in the remaining
subjects in any order.

(3) A student-at-law must not, at any one sitting, sit for examination in more than two

subjects until he or she has passed or been credited with or exempted from eight
compulsory subjects after which he or she may not, at any one sitting, sit for
examination in more than three subjects.

(4) The Examinations Committee may, in circumstances which it regards as sufficiently special and upon such conditions as it thinks fit, relax this rule.

60

(1) A person desirous of proceeding to any examination or examinations under these

Rules (in this and succeeding rules referred to as the candidate) shall make application to the Board for enrolment in accordance with the procedures and within the times set out in the Course Information Handbook for the session in which he or she intends to proceed.

(2) The candidate shall enrol for the examination or examinations and at the same time

for the corresponding course or courses of instruction conducted by the Law
Extension Committee.

(3) At the time of enrolling, the candidate shall pay to the Board the examination fee and

also such fees for the courses of instruction conducted by the Law Extension
Committee as have been fixed from time to time by the University of Sydney.

61

(1) Subject to sub-rule (2) the Boards examinations may be undertaken only at the examination centres set out in the Course Information Handbook.

(2) The Examinations Committee may, in circumstances which it regards as sufficiently

special and upon such conditions as it thinks fit, permit a candidate to undertake an
examination at an alternative centre.

62 (Repealed)

63 If the Board determines not to hold an examination at a country centre, the

candidates who desired to sit for the examination at that centre shall be notified in
time to enable them to sit for the examination in Sydney or at such other country

centre as the Board may determine.

63A A candidate who has enrolled for and undertaken a course of instruction in a

subject of examination conducted by the Law Extension Committee and who has
completed the requirements of the course may sit for the examination in that
subject unless the Law Extension Committee notifies the candidate and the
Examinations Committee prior to the examination that the candidate has not
completed the requirements of the course to the satisfaction of the Law Extension

Committee.

64 Subject to rule 67, any candidate who, without prior leave of the Examinations

Committee, fails to sit for examination in at least two subjects in any two successive sessions shall be excluded from taking any further examination prescribed by these Rules.

65 Subject to rule 67, a candidate who has passed the examinations in all subjects

except one and fails to sit for examination in the remaining subject at least once in any two successive sessions shall be excluded from taking any further examination in the remaining subject.

66 Subject to rule 67, a candidate who fails any subject a second time shall be

excluded from taking any further examination prescribed by these Rules.

67

(1) A person excluded by rule 64, rule 65 or rule 66 may apply to the Examinations Committee for a relaxation of the Rules.

(2) The Examinations Committee shall refer an application under sub-rule (1) to the Performance Review Sub-Committee or to the Executive Officer.
(3) The Performance Review Sub-Committee or the Executive Officer may, in

circumstances which it or he or she regards as sufficiently special and upon such
conditions as it or he or she thinks fit, relax rule 64, rule 65 or rule 66.
68–70 (Repealed)

71

(1) A person aggrieved by a determination of the Performance Review Sub-Committee or

the Executive Officer under rule 67 may, within one month of being given notice of the determination or within such extended time as the Examinations Committee may allow, apply to the Examinations Committee for a review of the determination.

(2) A person aggrieved by a determination of the Examinations Committee under sub- rule (1) may, within one month of being given notice of the determination or within such extended time as the Board may allow, apply to the Board for a review of the

determination.

72–76 (Repealed)

77 The Examinations Committee may refer to the Board any matter relating to the

examinations.

78 The Examinations Committee may, in circumstances which it regards as

sufficiently special and upon such conditions as it thinks fit, grant:

(a) exemption from any examination prescribed by these Rules, or

(b) exemption from any of the requirements of this Part.

78A

(1) The Board may award academic prizes to candidates in respect of their performance in the Board’s examinations.

(2) The terms and conditions of each prize shall be determined by the Board.

Part 8Certificates
79

(1) Upon request and upon payment of the prescribed fee, the Executive Officer may issue the following certificates:

(a) a certificate of registration as a student-at-law,

(b) a certificate of current admission,

(c) a certificate of academic record.

80

(1) Subject to sub-rule (2), a person who has passed the Board’s examinations save those

from which he or she has been exempted, is entitled to receive from the Board a
certificate entitled “Diploma in Law”.

(2) No person is entitled to receive the Diploma if he or she has sat for and passed fewer than half of the Board’s examinations.
(3) Subject to sub-rule (4), no charge shall be made for the issue of a Diploma.
(4) A person who wishes to receive from the Board a Diploma to which he or she is

entitled on account of examinations completed more than one year before making application for that Diploma, shall pay to the Board the fee prescribed in the Third Schedule for original diplomas and certificates.

(5) Upon receipt of a Diploma in Law, the person named therein shall be entitled to adopt

the description of the holder of that Diploma, and shall be entitled to use the post-
nominal “DipLaw”.

81 A student-at-law who is awarded an academic prize by the Board is entitled to

receive from the Board a certificate relating to that prize.

Part 9Discipline

82 The Examinations Committee and the Law Extension Committee shall be vigilant

to detect any cases of cheating in examinations or in home assignments (in this
Part referred to as academic misconduct).

83

(1) Where an allegation of academic misconduct is made against a student-at-law, the

Executive Officer shall, unless he or she is of the view that the allegation is frivolous, put the allegation to the student-at-law and request the student-at-law to show cause in writing within 14 days why he or she should not be dealt with under rule 84.

(2) The Executive Officer shall refer the allegation, and any response by the student-at- law, to the Examinations Committee.

84

(1) The Committee shall consider any allegation of academic misconduct referred to it by the Executive Officer, and any response by the student-at-law, and may decide:

(a) that the allegation is not substantiated,

(b) that the allegation is substantiated, but that no action should be taken in respect of the allegation, or

(c) that an oral hearing should be held in respect of the allegation.

(2) Where the Examinations Committee decides that an oral hearing should be held, the

procedure for the hearing shall be as close as practicable to the procedure set out in
Part 10.

(3) The Examinations Committee may, after considering the allegation, any response of the student-at-law, and any report of a hearing committee, decide:

(a) that the allegation is not substantiated,

(b) that the allegation is substantiated but that no action should be taken in respect of the allegation, or

(c) that the allegation is substantiated and:
(ca) that the student-at-law be admonished or reprimanded,

(cb) that the student-at-law be refused admission to further examinations for a defined

period, or

(cc) that the matter be reported to the Board.

85 Upon any matter coming before the Board under rule 84 (3) (c) (cc), the Board

may decide:

(a) that no action be taken,
(b) that the student-at-law be admonished or reprimanded,

(c)	that the student-at-law be refused admission to further examinations for a defined period, or
(d)	that the registration of the student as a student-at-law be cancelled.

86 A student-at-law aggrieved by a decision of the Examinations Committee under

rule 84 (3) (c) (ca) or rule 84 (3) (c) (cb) may apply to the Board for a review of

the decision.

87

(1) Where an allegation of misconduct, not being academic misconduct under rule 82, is made against a student-at-law, the Executive Officer shall, unless he or she is of the view that the allegation is frivolous, put the allegation to the student-at-law and

request the student-at-law to show cause in writing within 14 days why he or she
should not be dealt with under rule 88.

(2) The Executive Officer shall refer the allegation, and any response by the student-at- law, to the Board.

88

(1) The Board shall consider any allegation of misconduct referred to it by the Executive Officer under rule 87 (2), and any response by the student-at-law, and may decide:

(a) that the allegation is not substantiated,

(b) that the allegation is substantiated, but that no action should be taken in respect of the allegation, or

(c) that an oral hearing should be held in respect of the allegation.

(2) Where the Board decides that an oral hearing should be held, the procedure for the

hearing shall be as close as practicable to the procedure set out in Part 10.

(3) Where an oral hearing is held, the Board may, after considering the allegation, any response of the student-at-law, and any report of a hearing committee, decide:
(a) that the allegation is not substantiated,

(b)	that the allegation is substantiated but that no action should be taken in respect of the allegation, or
(c)

that the allegation is substantiated and: (cb) that the registration of the student as a student-at-law be cancelled.

Part 10Hearings

89 Whenever the Board considers that an oral hearing of any matter before it is

(1) A hearing committee shall consist of one or more members nominated by the necessary or desirable, or where an oral hearing is requested under rule 31 (3), the hearing should be before the whole Board.

90

President.

(2) Where more than one person is nominated, the President shall also nominate a Chairperson.

(1) The Chairperson of a hearing committee, or the sole member thereof, shall notify the

applicant and all other persons entitled to participate in the hearing of the time and
place of a preliminary conference at which directions will be given with respect to the
hearing.

(2) At the preliminary conference the Chairperson, or sole member of the hearing

committee, shall give such directions as to the conduct of the oral hearing as he or she
considers just.

92 (Repealed)
93

(1) The Chairperson or sole member of a hearing committee shall report to the Board in respect of the oral hearing.

(2) The Board shall not finalise its consideration of the matter to which the hearing relates before receiving the report of the hearing committee.

Part 11 Exemptions
94 – 96 (Repealed)

97

(1) Subject to subrule (9), a person who is not eligible to apply for a direction under exemption from some or all of the examinations set out in rule 53.

(2)-(7) (Repealed)

(7A) The Academic Exemptions Sub-Committee may exempt a person from
undertaking any examination referred to in rule 53 if it is satisfied, having regard to
the person’s studies, academic qualifications, the system of law applicable in the
jurisdiction in which the person obtained those qualifications, the nature and extent of
the person’s experience and the person’s performance in any task set by the Sub-

Committee, that the person ought not be required to undertake that examination.

(7B) The Academic Exemptions Sub-Committee may grant exemptions to a person
upon the person making an application or request under this rule or the Legal

Profession Uniform Admission Rules.

(8) The Academic Exemptions Sub-Committee may grant exemptions on such

conditions as it thinks fit.

(9) Notwithstanding sub-rule (1) no student-at-law shall apply under this rule for any
exemption arising from studies which the student-at-law has undertaken after

registering as a student-at-law unless -

(a) the student-at-law has obtained the prior approval of the Legal Qualifications
Committee to undertake those studies, or
(b) the Legal Qualifications Committee has allowed the application in the special
circumstances of the case.
(10) An application for exemption under this rule or Uniform Rule 11(1) or 5(2) shall

be in a form approved by the Board.

(11) A person aggrieved by a determination of the Academic Exemptions Sub- or within such extended time as the Legal Qualifications Committee may allow, request the Legal Qualifications Committee to review the determination.

(12) A request for review under this rule shall be in a form approved by the Board.

98

(1) A person who falls within one of the categories set out in sub-rule (2) may apply to

the Legal Qualifications Committee for exemption from practical training from some
or all of the competencies set out in schedule 2 of the Uniform Rules.

(2) The categories referred to in sub-rule (1) are:

(a) persons referred to Uniform Rule 6(4),

(b) persons referred to Uniform Rule 11(2),

(c) persons who have attained the age of 30 years, and have completed either seven years service as a New South Wales government, or government related, employee performing legal services, or 15 years service in courts administration in New South Wales.

(3)-(5) (Repealed)

(6) An application for exemption under this rule shall apply in and to the effect of Form

17.
(7) (Repealed)

(8) A person aggrieved by a determination of the Practical Training Exemptions Sub-

Committee may, within one month of the making of the determination, or within such
extended time as the Legal Qualifications Committee may allow, request the Legal
Qualifications Committee to review the determination.

(9) The Practical Training Exemptions Sub-Committee may grant exemptions on such conditions as it thinks fit.

Part 11B (Repealed)
Part 12Fees

109

(1) The fees to be charged for applications and services are those set out in the Third

Schedule.

(2) Once in each calendar year the Board shall review the fees to be charged.

(3) Where the Board varies the fees to be charged, the Third Schedule is amended

accordingly.

110–112
113

(1) A person may apply to the Board for the waiver of any fee payable under these Rules,

other than a fee payable under rule 60 (3) in respect of courses of instruction
conducted by the Law Extension Committee.

(2) No fee is payable in respect of an application under this rule.

Part 13Transitional

113A

(1) Each of the following bodies or persons shall continue in office under these Rules:

(a)	the Legal Qualifications Committee and the Examinations Committee constituted under the, Legal Profession Admission Rules 2005,
(b)	the Academic Exemptions Sub-Committee, the Practical Training Exemptions Sub- Committee, the Accreditation Sub-Committee, the Curriculum Sub-Committee and the Quality Committee appointed under the Legal Profession Admission Rules 2005,

(c) the Executive Officer appointed under the Legal Profession Admission Rules 2005,

(2) The Board and each of the bodies and persons referred to in sub-rule (1) shall carry

out their duties in such a way as to ensure, as far as practicable, that there is a smooth
transition from the operations of the Legal Profession Admission Board under the
Legal Profession Admission Rules 2005 to those of the Legal Profession Admission
Board under the NSW Admission Board Rules 2015.

114

(1) A student-at-law who has passed an examination under the Barristers and Solicitors

New Examination Rules, the Barristers and Solicitors Admission Rules 1989 the
Legal Practitioners Admission Rules 1994 or the Legal Profession Admission Rules
2005 shall be deemed to have passed the corresponding subject in the Board’s
examinations.

(2) A student-at-law who has passed or been credited with the examination in Preliminary

before 1 May 1993 shall be deemed to have passed the examination in Legal
Institutions and one of the examinations referred to in rule 53 (b).

(1) Any person who considers that he or she has suffered special prejudice as a result of

the taking effect of these Rules may apply to the Board for relief from such special
prejudice.

(2) The Board may in its discretion grant any application under this rule unconditionally, or on such conditions as it considers appropriate.

Part 14Miscellaneous

116 Where these Rules provide that an application shall be in a particular form, the form referred to is published on the Board’s website.

117 An application under these rules shall not be made to the Board, the Legal

Qualifications Committee or the Examinations Committee unless the application has attached to it all necessary supporting material and is accompanied by the prescribed fee.

118 The Board may delegate to the President, a member, several members, the

Executive Officer or any combination of the foregoing the making of a decision on any matter or class of matters, provided always that a person aggrieved by a decision of a delegate on any matter may apply to the Board for a reconsideration of the matter.

Schedules
First Schedule (Repealed)
Second Schedule (Repealed)

Third Schedule

Fee from 1/10/2014
$

Section 26 Application	360
Academic Exemptions Application	250
Practical Legal Training Exempt.	250
Re-Admission Application	980
Certificate of Admission	70
Original Diplomas/Certificates	160
Other Application/Certificate	70
Late Fee Admission	150
Late Application — Other	80
Dishonoured Cheque Fee	35
Photocopying — up to two pages	1
Duplicate Receipts	10
For services not listed in the schedule	70
Fourth Schedule (Repealed) Fifth Schedule (Repealed) Sixth Schedule (Repealed)

Student Registration Application	240
Rule 67 Application	80
Student Course Application	80
Rule 71 review	80
Academic Transcript	50
Interview with Examiner	130
Examination	190
Additional fees — examination in unscheduled location in a single examination period, where permitted:
NSW first subject / additional subject	300/200
eElsewhere in Australia first subject / additional	400/250
subject
STAT T Application	110
STAT T Reschedule	50