NOVLEY
v
THE QUEEN
[2023] HCASL 75
B4/2023
The applicant requires an extension of time within which to seek special leave to appeal from a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Queensland (McMurdo and Mullins JJA and North J) dismissing his appeal against conviction.
The applicant has not identified a question of principle of general importance sufficient to warrant a grant of special leave to appeal and otherwise advances no arguable ground of appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal. An appeal to this Court does not enjoy sufficient prospects of success. It would therefore be futile to grant the extension that is sought. Special leave should be refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
M.M. Gordon J.M. Jagot 11 May 2023
Continue reading Novley v The Queen
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- Novley v The Queen [2023] HCASL 75
- Case
- [2023] HCASL 75
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the court was whether special leave should be granted to the applicant, given that he did not identify a question of principle of general importance or provide other arguable grounds for appeal. The court considered whether the application had sufficient prospects of success, and if not, whether it would be futile to grant the extension sought.
In its reasoning, the court determined that the applicant had not identified a question of principle of general importance sufficient to warrant a grant of special leave to appeal. Additionally, the court found that the applicant did not present any other arguable grounds for appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal. As a result, the court concluded that the appeal to the High Court did not enjoy sufficient prospects of success and would therefore be futile. The court thus refused special leave and directed the Registrar to draw up, sign, and seal an order dismissing the application.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.