Novartis AG v chang liu, Chen Fan Ren, Ren Chen Fan, g m, Shan Xi Xi Bu

Case

WIPO Case No. D2024-5218

14-03-2025

No judgment structure available for this case.

ARBITRATION

AND

MEDIATION CENTER

ADMINISTRATIVE PANEL DECISION

Novartis AG v. chang liu, Chen Fan Ren, Ren Chen Fan, g m, Shan Xi Xi Bu
Chuan Mei Hai Wai Ying Xiao You Xian Gong Si, janis yan, july liu, ruitian liu,
sima xingwei, Xiao Juan Jin, xingyun rao, 镭 珂 (leo ke), Chen Chen Zang,
tao lei

Case No. D2024-5218

1. The Parties

The Complainant is Novartis AG, Switzerland, represented by MSA IP - Milojevic Sekulic & Associates,
Serbia.

The Respondents are chang liu, Chen Fan Ren, Ren Chen Fan, g m, Shan Xi Xi Bu Chuan Mei Hai Wai Ying ke), Chen Chen Zang, tao lei, China.

2. The Domain Names and Registrar

The disputed domain names <best-kisqali001.site>, <kesimpta.xyz>, <kisqali.agency>, <kisqali.beauty>,
<kisqali.buzz>, <kisqali.digital>, <kisqali.icu>, <kisqali.life>, <kisqali.ltd>, <kisqali.monster>, <kisqali.online>,
<kisqali-price.shop>, <kisqali.quest>, <kisqali.rent>, <kisqali.rest>, <kisqalisale.shop>, <kisqalis.beauty>,
<kisqali.shop>, <kisqali.skin>, <kisqalis.life>, <kisqalis.live>, <kisqali.solutions>, <kisqali.space>,
<kisqalis18.live>, <kisqalis188.live>, <kisqalis1888.live>, <kisqalis7.life>, <kisqalis7.live>, <kisqalis7.shop>,
<kisqalis8.live>, <kisqalis88.live>, <kisqalis888.live>, <kisqalis99.shop>, <kisqali.today>, <kisqali.top>,
<kisqali.website>, <kisqali.world>, <kisqali.xyz>, <kisqali0.live>, <kisqali00.shop>, <kisqali001.live>,
<kisqali0027.today>, <kisqali007.live>, <kisqali007.today>, <kisqali007.xyz>, <kisqali01.live>,
<kisqali-01.online>, <kisqali01.online>, <kisqali-01.shop>, <kisqali01.shop>, <kisqali01.store>,
<kisqali01.today>, <kisqali01.xyz>, <kisqali-02.online>, <kisqali02.online>, <kisqali02.xyz>, <kisqali026.life>,
<kisqali03.life>, <kisqali-03.online>, <kisqali03.xyz>, <kisqali036.life>, <kisqali-04.online>, <kisqali05.life>
<kisqali-05.site>, <kisqali06.live>, <kisqali06.shop>, <kisqali07.beauty>, <kisqali07.life>, <kisqali07.live>,
<kisqali07.online>, <kisqali07.shop>, <kisqali07.today>, <kisqali076.online>, <kisqali077.life>,
<kisqali077.live>, <kisqali077.online>, <kisqali08.online>, <kisqali09.life>, <kisqali09.live>, <kisqali09.shop>,
<kisqali09.today>, <kisqali09.xyz>, <kisqali-1.beauty>, <kisqali-1.buzz>, <kisqali-1.life>, <kisqali-1.live>,
<kisqali1.live>, <kisqali-1.shop>, <kisqali1.shop>, <kisqali1.space>, <kisqali1.today>, <kisqali1.xyz>,
<kisqali10.today>, <kisqali100.life>, <kisqali107.beauty>, <kisqali107.xyz>, <kisqali11.online>,
<kisqali11.today>, <kisqali117.live>, <kisqali12.life>, <kisqali12.live>, <kisqali12.shop>, <kisqali12.today>,
<kisqali12.world>, <kisqali12.xyz>, <kisqali1207.beauty>, <kisqali121.live>, <kisqali127.beauty>,
<kisqali13.today>, <kisqali14.today>, <kisqali-17.live>, <kisqali18.beauty>, <kisqali18.life>,
<kisqali1988.shop>, <kisqali-2.live>, <kisqali2.today>, <kisqali2.xyz>, <kisqali20.today>, <kisqali2024.live>,

page 2

<kisqali2024.shop>, <kisqali2024.xyz>, <kisqali22.life>, <kisqali23.online>, <kisqali24.life>,
<kisqali24.online>, <kisqali24.shop>, <kisqali24.xyz>, <kisqali25.online>, <kisqali26.life>, <kisqali26.online>,
<kisqali27.online>, <kisqali28.life>, <kisqali28.online>, <kisqali29.life>, <kisqali3.life>, <kisqali3.ltd>,
<kisqali3.shop>, <kisqali3.today>, <kisqali3.world>, <kisqali3.xyz>, <kisqali30.online>, <kisqali31.online>,
<kisqali32.online>, <kisqali326.online>, <kisqali33.online>, <kisqali33.shop>, <kisqali34.online>,
<kisqali344.live>, <kisqali35.online>,<kisqali36.life>, <kisqali365.life>, <kisqali365.live>, <kisqali37.live>,
<kisqali39.life>, <kisqali39.shop>, <kisqali397.services>, <kisqali4.life>, <kisqali4.live>, <kisqali4.today>,
<kisqali4.xyz>, <kisqali47.live>, <kisqali5.buzz>, <kisqali5.life>, <kisqali5.live>, <kisqali5.ltd>, kisqali5.shop>,
<kisqali5.today>, <kisqali5.world>, <kisqali6.buzz>, <kisqali6.life>, <kisqali6.live>, <kisqali-6.shop>
<kisqali6.shop>, <kisqali6.today>, <kisqali6.top>, <kisqali6.world>, kisqali6.xyz>,<kisqali66.online>,
<kisqali66.shop>, <kisqali666.live>, <kisqali67.life>, <kisqali7.beauty>, <kisqali7.buzz>, <kisqali7.digital>,
<kisqali7.fun>, <kisqali7.life>, <kisqali-7.live>, <kisqali7.live>, <kisqali7.ltd>, <kisqali7.online>,
<kisqali7.services>, <kisqali7.shop>, <kisqali7.site>, <kisqali7.space>,, <kisqali7.store>, <kisqali7.today>,
<kisqali7.top>, <kisqali7.website>, <kisqali7.world>, <kisqali7.xyz>, <kisqali71.online>, <kisqali71.shop>,
<kisqali77.life>, <kisqali77.live>, <kisqali77.shop>, <kisqali77.today>, <kisqali79.xyz>, <kisqali8.online>,
<kisqali8.shop>, <kisqali8.today>, <kisqali808.life>, <kisqali888.life>, <kisqali-9.life>, <kisqali9.life>,
<kisqali9.online>, <kisqali9.shop>, <kisqali9.today>, <kisqali97.xyz>, <kisqali99.live>, <kisqali999.life>,
<ribociclib-kisqali.ltd>, <the-kisqali.today>, <the-kisqali1.today>, <the-kisqali2.today>, <the-kisqali5.today>,
<the-kisqali7.today>, <the-kisqali7.xyz>, and <1-kisqali.online> are registered with GoDaddy.com, LLC (the

“Registrar”).

3. Procedural History

The Complaint was filed with the WIPO Arbitration and Mediation Center (the “Center”) on December 18, 2024. On December 19, 2024, the Center transmitted by email to the Registrar a request for registrar verification in connection with the disputed domain names. On December 20 and 31, 2024, the Registrar transmitted by email to the Center its verification response disclosing registrant and contact information for the disputed domain names which differed from the named Respondent (Domains By Proxy, LLC).

The Center sent an email communication to the Complainant on January 9, 2025, with the registrant and contact information of nominally multiple underlying registrants revealed by the Registrar, requesting the Complainant to either file separate complaint(s) for the disputed domain names associated with different underlying registrants or alternatively, demonstrate that the underlying registrants are in fact the same entity

and/or that all domain names are under common control. The Complainant filed an amended Complaint on
January 21, 2025.

Following the Center’s email communication of January 24, 2025 to the Complainant in which the Center advised that as per the Registrar’s email of January 22, 2025 the disputed domain name <kisqali.live> which was registered on November 7, 2023 and expired on November 7, 2024 had been cancelled and could no longer be redeemed or renewed, the Complainant filed on January 29, 2025 an amended Complaint in which it withdrew the <kisqali.live> disputed domain name from the proceedings.

The Center verified that the Complaint together with the amended Complaint satisfied the formal
requirements of the Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Policy” or “UDRP”), the Rules for
Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Rules”), and the WIPO Supplemental Rules for

Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy (the “Supplemental Rules”).

In accordance with the Rules, paragraphs 2 and 4, the Center formally notified the Respondent of the
Complaint, and the proceedings commenced on January 31, 2025. In accordance with the Rules, paragraph
5, the due date for Response was February 20, 2025. The Respondent did not submit any response.
Accordingly, the Center notified the Respondent’s default on February 21, 2025.

The Center appointed Zoltán Takács as the sole panelist in this matter on March 3, 2025. The Panel finds that it was properly constituted. The Panel has submitted the Statement of Acceptance and Declaration of Impartiality and Independence, as required by the Center to ensure compliance with the Rules, paragraph 7.

page 3

On March 3, 2025, the Complainant submitted via email an amended Complaint to the Center and the Respondents in which it requested change of remedy, namely that the disputed domain names subject to the proceedings be cancelled instead of being transferred to the Complainant. The Respondents did not submit any response.

4. Factual Background

The Complainant in this administrative proceeding is one of the world’s leading pharmaceutical companies that provides innovative healthcare solutions.

The Complainant has more than 380 operating sites around the world, including more than 50 production sites and research and development facilities in the United States of America, Europe and Asia.

The Complainant’s global pharmaceutical portfolio includes more than 50 key marketed products which are available in approximately 130 countries.

The Complainant is – among others - owner of the following trademark registrations:

- International Trademark Registration (“IR”) No. 1226294 KISQALI registered on October 2, 2014, and

- IR No. 1390984 KESIMPTA registered on January 15, 2018.

The Complainant is – among others – also owner of the domain names <kisqali.com> and <kesimpta.com>
which were registered on December 16, 2013, and January 3, 2018, respectively and which resolve to the
Complainant’s websites concerning its Kisqali and Kesimpta medicines.

The disputed domain names were registered between December 8, 2023, and September 20, 2024, and have been resolving to websites with automatically generated pay-per-click (“PPC”) links.

5. Parties’ Contentions

A. Complainant

The Complainant contends that it has satisfied each of the elements required under the Policy for a transfer of the disputed domain name.

Notably, the Complainant contends that:

- the disputed domain names that incorporate the Complainant’s KESIMPTA and KISQALI marks in full with
the addition of various numbers, letters or generic or relevant medical terms (such as “the”, “best”, “price”,

“sale”, “ribociclib”, etc.) and are confusingly similar to the Complainant’s marks;

- the Respondents have no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the disputed domain names since they

are unable to rely on any of the circumstances set out in paragraphs 4(c)(i), (ii), or (iii) of the Policy;

- due to the highly distinctive nature of its trademarks, it is difficult to imagine that the Respondents did not

have the Complainant’s marks in mind when registering the disputed domain names; and

- use of the disputed domain names for websites that display PPC links indicates the Respondents’ intent to

make a commercial gain by abusing the reputation of the Complainant’s marks.

The Complainant requests that the disputed domain names be cancelled.

page 4

B. Respondents

The Respondents did not reply to the Complainant’s contentions.

6. Discussion and Findings

A complainant must evidence each of the three elements required by paragraph 4(a) of the Policy in order to succeed on the complaint, namely that:

(i)        the domain names are identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the complainant has rights;

(ii)       the respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain names; and

(iii)      the domain names have been registered and are being used in bad faith.

Change of Remedy

As mentioned above, after notifying the Respondents on the Complaint and after appointment of the Panel, the Complainant has on March 3, 2025, submitted via email an amended Complaint in which it requested change of remedy, namely that the disputed domain names subject to the proceedings be cancelled instead of being transferred to the Complainant.

The Complainant has copied the Respondents on its request concerning change of the remedy. The
Respondents did not submit any comments on the Complainant’s request.

The Panel notes that the Complainant is empowered by paragraph 4(i) of the Policy and paragraph 3(x) of the Rules to choose between cancellation and transfer of the disputed domain name(s) as the appropriate way of relief regarding its Complaint. In view of the Panel, no prejudice would be caused to the Respondents

by allowing the Complainant to switch the remedy from transfer to cancellation.

Accordingly, the Complainant’s request to change the remedy from transfer to cancellation is accepted.

Consolidation: Multiple Respondents

The amended Complaint was filed in relation to 228 domain names registered by 12 different domain name registrants. The Complainant alleges that the domain name registrants are the same entity, or under common control. The Complainant requests the consolidation of the Complaint against the multiple disputed domain name registrants pursuant to paragraph 10(e) of the Rules.

The disputed domain name registrants did not comment on the Complainant’s request.

Paragraph 3(c) of the Rules states that a complaint may relate to more than one domain name, provided that the domain names are registered by the same domain name holder.

In addressing the Complainant’s request, the Panel will consider whether (i) the disputed domain names or corresponding websites are subject to common control; and (ii) the consolidation would be fair and equitable to all Parties. WIPO Overview of WIPO Panel Views on Selected UDRP Questions, Third Edition (“WIPO Overview 3.0”), section 4.11.2.

As regards to common control, the Panel notes that the disputed domain names are registered with the
same Registrar; the registrants are all located in China; they all share the same name servers; the disputed
domain names all resolve to PPC webpages; the Respondents all target the Complainant and its marks and
the structure of the disputed domain names (mark-numbers or term-mark-numbers or number-mark) is
identical or highly similar. As regards fairness and equity, the Panel sees no reason why consolidation of the
disputes would be unfair or inequitable to any Party.

page 5

Accordingly, the Panel decides to consolidate the disputes regarding the nominally different disputed domain name registrants (referred to below as “the Respondent”) in a single proceeding.

A. Identical or Confusingly Similar

It is well accepted that the first element functions primarily as a standing requirement. The standing (or threshold) test for confusing similarity involves a reasoned but relatively straightforward comparison between the Complainant’s trademark and the disputed domain name. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.7.

The Complainant has shown rights in respect of trademarks or service marks for the purposes of the Policy.
WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.2.1.

WIPO Overview 3.0, section 1.11.1.

The disputed domain names <kisqali.agency>, <kisqali.beauty>, <kisqali.buzz>, <kisqali.digital>, therefore identical to the Complainant’s marks.
<kisqali.icu>, <kisqali.life>, <kisqali.ltd>, <kisqali.monster>, <kisqali.online>, <kisqali.quest>, <kisqali.rent>,
<kisqali.rest>, <kisqali.shop>, <kisqali.skin>, <kisqali.solutions>, <kisqali.space>, <kisqali.today>,
<kisqali.top>, <kisqali.website>, <kisqali.world>, <kisqali.xyz> and <kesimpta.xyz> are combinations of the

The rest of the disputed domain names which contain either the Complainant’s KISQALI mark in full or the mark with the addition of the letter “s” to the mark in combination with various terms (“best”, “sale”, “price”, “ribociclib”, and “the”) hyphens and a great number of one-, two-, three-, or four-digit numerals to the mark are confusingly similar to the mark. The Complainant’s KISQALI mark is recognizable within these disputed

domain names and the addition of the mentioned terms, symbols and numerals does not prevent a finding of confusing similarity between the disputed domain names and the mark for the purposes of the Policy. WIPO Overview 3.0, sections 1.7 and 1.8.

The Panel finds that the first element of the Policy has been established.

B. Rights or Legitimate Interests

Paragraph 4(c) of the Policy provides a list of circumstances in which the Respondent may demonstrate rights or legitimate interests in a disputed domain name.

Although the overall burden of proof in UDRP proceedings is on the complainant, panels have recognized that proving a respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in a domain name may result in the difficult task of “proving a negative”, requiring information that is often primarily within the knowledge or control of the respondent. As such, where a complainant makes out a prima facie case that the respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests, the burden of production on this element shifts to the respondent to come forward with relevant evidence demonstrating rights or legitimate interests in the domain name (although the burden of proof always remains on the complainant). If the respondent fails to come forward with such relevant evidence, the complainant is deemed to have satisfied the second element. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 2.1.

Having reviewed the available record, the Panel finds the Complainant has established a prima facie case that the Respondent lacks rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain names. The Respondent has not rebutted the Complainant’s prima facie showing and has not come forward with any relevant evidence demonstrating rights or legitimate interests in the disputed domain names such as those enumerated in the Policy or otherwise.

Based on the available record, the Complainant has not authorized, licensed, or allowed the Respondent or any third party to use its KISQALI or KESIMPTA marks through the disputed domain names or in any other way that would confer validity or legitimacy upon such usage.

The Panel also notes the composition of the disputed domain names and that Respondent is not making a noncommercial or fair use of the disputed domain names in terms of paragraph 4(c)(iii) of the Policy since

page 6

referrals through sponsored links to advertisers may reasonable be assumed to be commercial in its intent and effect. The use of the disputed domain names to host webpages comprising PPC links capitalizing on the reputation and goodwill of the Complainant’s marks cannot create rights or legitimate interests in the

disputed domain names. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 2.9.

The Panel finds that the second element of the Policy has been established.

C. Registered and Used in Bad Faith

The Panel notes that, for the purposes of paragraph 4(a)(iii) of the Policy, paragraph 4(b) of the Policy establishes circumstances, in particular, but without limitation, that, if found by the Panel to be present, shall be evidence of the registration and use of a domain name in bad faith.

In the present case, the Panel notes that the KISQALI and KESIMPTA marks have no meaning and that they were created by the Complainant. A basic Internet search for the marks returns solely the Complainant and its KISQALI and KESIMPTA medicines. Taking into account these facts, the Panel finds it highly unlikely

that the Respondent was unaware of the existence of the Complainant’s marks at the time of registration of
the disputed domain names.

Furthermore, there can be no conceivable explanation for the Respondent’s registration and use of the disputed domain names which either reproduce the Complainant’s KISQALI and KESIMPTA marks in full or in addition to other terms, hyphens, and/ or numbers other than to misuse and derive commercial gain from reputation of the Complainant’s business and its marks.

In this case the use of the disputed domain names for websites that display automatically generated PPC
links falls within the scope of paragraph 4(b)(iv) of the Policy since Internet users are likely to be drawn to the
PPC webpages by reason of similarity and resulting confusion between the disputed domain names and the

Complainant’s marks. WIPO Overview 3.0, section 3.5.

The Panel finds that the Complainant has established the third element of the Policy.

7. Decision

For the foregoing reasons, in accordance with paragraphs 4(i) of the Policy and 15 of the Rules, the Panel
orders that the disputed domain names <best-kisqali001.site>, <kesimpta.xyz>, <kisqali.agency>,
<kisqali.beauty>, <kisqali.buzz>, <kisqali.digital>, <kisqali.icu>, <kisqali.life>, <kisqali.ltd>, <kisqali.monster>,


<kisqali.online>, <kisqali-price.shop>, <kisqali.quest>, <kisqali.rent>, <kisqali.rest>, <kisqalisale.shop>,
<kisqalis.beauty>, <kisqali.shop>, <kisqali.skin>, <kisqalis.life>, <kisqalis.live>, <kisqali.solutions>,
<kisqali.space>, <kisqalis18.live>, <kisqalis188.live>, <kisqalis1888.live>, <kisqalis7.life>, <kisqalis7.live>,
<kisqalis7.shop>, <kisqalis8.live>, <kisqalis88.live>, <kisqalis888.live>, <kisqalis99.shop>, <kisqali.today>,
<kisqali.top>, <kisqali.website>, <kisqali.world>, <kisqali.xyz>, <kisqali0.live>, <kisqali00.shop>,
<kisqali001.live>, <kisqali0027.today>, <kisqali007.live>, <kisqali007.today>, <kisqali007.xyz>,
<kisqali01.live>, <kisqali-01.online>, <kisqali01.online>, <kisqali-01.shop>, <kisqali01.shop>,
<kisqali01.store>, <kisqali01.today>, <kisqali01.xyz>, <kisqali-02.online>, <kisqali02.online>,
<kisqali02.xyz>, <kisqali026.life>, <kisqali03.life>, <kisqali-03.online>, <kisqali03.xyz>, <kisqali036.life>,
<kisqali-04.online>, <kisqali05.life> <kisqali-05.site>, <kisqali06.live>, <kisqali06.shop>, <kisqali07.beauty>,
<kisqali07.life>, <kisqali07.live>, <kisqali07.online>, <kisqali07.shop>, <kisqali07.today>,
<kisqali076.online>, <kisqali077.life>, <kisqali077.live>, <kisqali077.online>, <kisqali08.online>,
<kisqali09.life>, <kisqali09.live>, <kisqali09.shop>, <kisqali09.today>, <kisqali09.xyz>, <kisqali-1.beauty>,
<kisqali-1.buzz>, <kisqali-1.life>, <kisqali-1.live>, <kisqali1.live>, <kisqali-1.shop>, <kisqali1.shop>,
<kisqali1.space>, <kisqali1.today>, <kisqali1.xyz>, <kisqali10.today>, <kisqali100.life>, <kisqali107.beauty>,
<kisqali107.xyz>, <kisqali11.online>, <kisqali11.today>, <kisqali117.live>, <kisqali12.life>, <kisqali12.live>,
<kisqali12.shop>, <kisqali12.today>, <kisqali12.world>, <kisqali12.xyz>, <kisqali1207.beauty>,
<kisqali121.live>, <kisqali127.beauty>, <kisqali13.today>, <kisqali14.today>, <kisqali-17.live>,
<kisqali18.beauty>, <kisqali18.life>, <kisqali1988.shop>, <kisqali-2.live>, <kisqali2.today>, <kisqali2.xyz>,

page 7

<kisqali20.today>, <kisqali2024.live>, <kisqali2024.shop>, <kisqali2024.xyz>, <kisqali22.life>,
<kisqali23.online>, <kisqali24.life>, <kisqali24.online>, <kisqali24.shop>, <kisqali24.xyz>, <kisqali25.online>,
<kisqali26.life>, <kisqali26.online>, <kisqali27.online>, <kisqali28.life>, <kisqali28.online>, <kisqali29.life>,
<kisqali3.life>, <kisqali3.ltd>, <kisqali3.shop>, <kisqali3.today>, <kisqali3.world>, <kisqali3.xyz>,
<kisqali30.online>, <kisqali31.online>, <kisqali32.online>, <kisqali326.online>, <kisqali33.online>,
<kisqali33.shop>, <kisqali34.online>, <kisqali344.live>, <kisqali35.online>,<kisqali36.life>, <kisqali365.life>,
<kisqali365.live>, <kisqali37.live>, <kisqali39.life>, <kisqali39.shop>, <kisqali397.services>, <kisqali4.life>,
<kisqali4.live>, <kisqali4.today>, <kisqali4.xyz>, <kisqali47.live>, <kisqali5.buzz>, <kisqali5.life>,
<kisqali5.live>, <kisqali5.ltd>, <kisqali5.shop>, <kisqali5.today>, <kisqali5.world>, <kisqali6.buzz>,
<kisqali6.life>, <kisqali6.live>, <kisqali-6.shop> <kisqali6.shop>, <kisqali6.today>, <kisqali6.top>,
<kisqali6.world>, <kisqali6.xyz>,<kisqali66.online>, <kisqali66.shop>, <kisqali666.live>, <kisqali67.life>,
<kisqali7.beauty>, <kisqali7.buzz>, <kisqali7.digital>, <kisqali7.fun>, <kisqali7.life>, <kisqali-7.live>,
<kisqali7.live>, <kisqali7.ltd>, <kisqali7.online>, <kisqali7.services>, <kisqali7.shop>, <kisqali7.site>,
<kisqali7.space>,, <kisqali7.store>, <kisqali7.today>, <kisqali7.top>, <kisqali7.website>, <kisqali7.world>,
<kisqali7.xyz>, <kisqali71.online>, <kisqali71.shop>, <kisqali77.life>, <kisqali77.live>, <kisqali77.shop>,
<kisqali77.today>, <kisqali79.xyz>, <kisqali8.online>, <kisqali8.shop>, <kisqali8.today>, <kisqali808.life>,
<kisqali888.life>, <kisqali-9.life>, <kisqali9.life>, <kisqali9.online>, <kisqali9.shop>, <kisqali9.today>,
<kisqali97.xyz>, <kisqali99.live>, <kisqali999.life>, <ribociclib-kisqali.ltd>, <the-kisqali.today>,
<the-kisqali1.today>, <the-kisqali2.today>, <the-kisqali5.today>, <the-kisqali7.today>, <the-kisqali7.xyz>,

and <1-kisqali.online> be cancelled.

/Zoltán Takács/
Zoltán Takács
Sole Panelist
Date: March 14, 2025

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0