FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| NORTON & LOCKE | [2013] FCCA 1259 |
| Catchwords: FAMILY LAW – Stay – application for Stay pending Appeal – whether de facto financial cause – jurisdiction of the Court to make interlocutory orders where de facto relationship in issue – principles relating to stay considered. |
| Legislation: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), s.4 Family Law Rules 2004, r.22.11 |
| Cases cited: Aldridge & Keaton (Stay Appeal) [2009] FamCAFC 106 Jackson & Balen [2009] FamCAFC 131 Locke & Norton [2013] FCCA 1154 State Central Authority & Ustinov (No.2) [2008] FamCA 368 Stone & Stone [2013] FamCA 479 |
| Applicant: | MR NORTON |
| Respondent: | MS LOCKE |
| File Number: | SYC 2828 of 2013 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Scarlett |
| Hearing date: | 23 August 2013 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 23 August 2013 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 3 September 2013 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mrs Bridger |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Barraket Stanton Lawyers |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Mr White SC |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Michael Conley Lawyers |
ORDERS
The Application for a stay of Orders (1) to (5) inclusive made on 6 August 2013 is dismissed.
The Respondent’s costs are reserved.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment under the pseudonym Norton & Locke is approved pursuant to s.121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYC 2828 of 2013
| MR NORTON |
Applicant
And
| MS LOCKE |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Application
This is an Application by the Respondent to the primary Application for a stay of the Orders made by this Court on 6 August 2013 (Locke & Norton[1]). Those Orders provided that, until further order:
[1] [2013] FCCA 1154
(1)The Respondent, his servants, agents or otherwise howsoever pending the final determination of these proceedings or further Order is restrained from interfering with the Applicant’s continued exclusive occupancy of the property situated at [Property D] in the State of New South Wales being the land in folio identifier [omitted] (the property).
(2)The Respondent, his servants, agents or otherwise howsoever pending the final determination of these proceedings or further Order is restrained from doing any act or thing or causing any act or thing to be done which has the purpose or effect of transferring, assigning, mortgaging, encumbering, charging or otherwise dealing with his interest in the property including whether at law or in equity.
(3)The Respondent pending final determination of these proceedings or further Order is to pay the following outgoings in relation to the property as and when they fall due:
3.1 mortgage payments;
3.2 council rates;
3.3 insurances;
3.4 body corporate levies;
3.5 water rates; and
3.6 electricity and gas charges.
(4)The Respondent must file and serve a Financial Statement as required by Rule 24.02 within fourteen (14) days of the date of these Orders.
(5)The Respondent must provide to the Applicant’s solicitors a copy of all documents referred to in Rule 24.04 within fourteen (14) days of the date…
Continue reading NORTON & LOCKE
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- NORTON & LOCKE [2013] FCCA 1259
- Case
- [2013] FCCA 1259
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was whether the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to warrant a stay of the previously made orders. This involved an assessment of the applicant's prospects of success on appeal and whether the balance of convenience favoured granting the stay.
The court dismissed the application for a stay. The reasons for this decision are not detailed in the provided text, but the outcome indicates that the applicant failed to satisfy the necessary legal tests for obtaining a stay of the 6 August 2013 orders. The court also reserved the respondent's costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
The Application for a stay of Orders (1) to (5) inclusive made on 6 August 2013 is dismissed.
2.
The Respondent’s costs are reserved.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.