Northway v Coulthard
[1913] HCA 73
•28 May 1913
352
HIGH COURT
[1913.
H.c. OF A. that the word “ Borsalino,” which, at first, was naturally used as
| 1913. | a surname, acquired and retained, at all events in Victoria, a |
'
secondary meaning denoting the hats manufactured by the
V. plaintiffs.
GuiseppT e
For these reasons we are of opinion that the orders made by
ŜocmTA° learned Judge ai'e right, and this appeal fails.
A n o n f m a .
Appeal disviissed with costs.
Solicitors, for the appellants, Moule, Hamilton & Kiddle.
Solicitor, for the respondents, F. B. Waters.
B. L.
[HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA.]
NORTHWAY ,
A ppellant ;
D efe n d a n t ,
COULTHARD .
Respondent.
P l a in tiff ,
ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF
SOUTH AUSTRALIA.
H. C. OF A.
T he case turned so lely on questions of fact.
1913. The judgment of the Supreme Court of South Australia
A d e l a i d e ,
{Buchanan A.J.) was affirmed.
May 27, 28
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Barton A.C J .,
Gavan Duffy
and Rich J J .
Solicitor, for the appellant, George McEwin.
Solicitor, for the respondent, Robert Hamburg, Jun.
B. L.
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Commercial Law
-
Intellectual Property
Legal Concepts
-
Appeal
-
Costs
-
Statutory Construction
0
0
0