Northway v Coulthard

Case [1913] HCA 73


352

HIGH COURT

[1913.

H.c. OF A. that the word “ Borsalino,” which, at first, was naturally used as

1913.

a surname, acquired and retained, at all events in Victoria, a

'

secondary meaning denoting the hats manufactured by the

V. plaintiffs.

GuiseppT e

For these reasons we are of opinion that the orders made by

ŜocmTA° learned Judge ai'e right, and this appeal fails.

A n o n f m a .

Appeal disviissed with costs.

Solicitors, for the appellants, Moule, Hamilton & Kiddle.

Solicitor, for the respondents, F. B. Waters.

B. L.

[HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA.]

NORTHWAY ,

A ppellant ;

D efe n d a n t ,

COULTHARD .

Respondent.

P l a in tiff ,

ON APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF

SOUTH AUSTRALIA.

H. C. OF A.

T he case turned so lely on questions of fact.

1913. The judgment of the Supreme Court of South Australia

A d e l a i d e ,

{Buchanan A.J.) was affirmed.

May 27, 28

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Barton A.C J .,

Gavan Duffy

and Rich J J .

Solicitor, for the appellant, George McEwin.

Solicitor, for the respondent, Robert Hamburg, Jun.

B. L.

Details
AGLC
Northway v Coulthard [1913] HCA 73
Case
[1913] HCA 73
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

The High Court of Australia considered an appeal from the Supreme Court of South Australia concerning the use of the word "Borsalino". The dispute centred on whether the word, initially a surname, had acquired a secondary meaning in Victoria to denote hats manufactured by the respondent.

The primary legal issue before the High Court was whether the word "Borsalino" had, in Victoria, acquired a secondary meaning denoting the hats manufactured by the respondent. This question was framed as turning solely on issues of fact.

The Court concluded that the word "Borsalino" had indeed acquired and retained a secondary meaning in Victoria, specifically referring to the hats manufactured by the respondent. Consequently, the Court found the orders made by the learned judge of the Supreme Court to be correct.

The appeal was dismissed with costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.