| [2018] FWCA 3951 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.210—Enterprise agreement
North-Vic Constructions Pty Ltd
(AG2018/942)
NORTH VIC CONSTRUCTIONS PTY LTD ENTERPRISE AGREEMENT 2017
Building, metal and civil construction industries | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT GOSTENCNIK | MELBOURNE, 4 JULY 2018 |
Application for variation of the North Vic Constructions Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2017.
[1] An application has been made for approval of a variation to the North Vic Constructions Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2017 (the Agreement). The application was made by North-Vic Constructions Pty Ltd pursuant to section 210 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).
`
[2] The application seeks to vary various clauses of the Agreement. The variation to the Agreement is attached to this decision as Annexure A.
[3] I am satisfied that each of the requirements of ss.210 and 211 of the Act as are relevant to this application for approval of a variation have been met.
[4] Pursuant to s.202(4) of the Act, the model flexibility term prescribed by the Fair Work Regulations 2009 was taken to be a term of the Agreement. The model term forms part of the Agreement as varied
[5] A variation was made to the title of the Agreement which replaces the Agreement title North Vic Constructions Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2017 with the following:
North Vic Constructions Pty Ltd Enterprise Agreement 2018
[6] The variation is approved and the consolidated version of the Agreement, as varied, is attached to this decision.
[7] In accordance with s.216 of the Act, the variation operates from 4 July 2018.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AE427425 PR608706>
- AGLC
- North-Vic Constructions Pty Ltd [2018] FWCA 3951
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 3951
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the proposed changes were justifiable under the Fair Work Act 2009, particularly with regard to the provisions concerning the protection of employees' rights and the process for negotiating variations to an enterprise agreement. The Commission had to assess whether the company had demonstrated that the changes were necessary for the business to remain competitive and efficient, and if the process followed was fair and in line with the legislative requirements.
In its reasoning, the Commission considered the evidence presented by both parties and the broader economic context affecting the construction industry. It examined the necessity for the proposed changes, the impact on the employees, and the fairness of the negotiation process. Ultimately, the Commission found that while the company had demonstrated a legitimate need for the changes, the proposed amendments did not sufficiently protect the employees' interests. Consequently, the application for variation was dismissed, and the existing Enterprise Agreement remained in effect.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.