North Queensland Mining Pty Ltd v Struber

Link copied
Case Copied 9 min read

LAND COURT OF QUEENSLAND

CITATION:

North Queensland Mining Pty Ltd v Struber & Anor [2016] QLC 4

 PARTIES: North Queensland Mining Pty Ltd
(applicant)
v
Stephen Struber and Dianne Wilson-Struber
(respondents)
 FILE NO:
MRA088-15
 PROCEEDINGS: Determination of compensation payable for grant of mining lease.
 DELIVERED ON: 29 January 2016
 DELIVERED AT: Brisbane
 HEARD ON: Submissions closed 30 November 2015
 HEARD AT: Heard on the papers
JUDICIAL REGISTRAR:

GJ Smith

 ORDERS:

1.         In respect of ML 100018 compensation is determined in the total sum of $2950.00 per annum.

2.         The miner pay compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland on behalf of the landowners the amount set out in order 1 within two months from notification of the issue of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines and thereafter on the anniversary of the renewal of the mining lease.

CATCHWORDS:

APPEARANCES:

MINING LEASE - grant - access - determination of compensation - use of Court judgments for determination purposes.

Mineral Resources Act 1989 ss 279, 281
Public Trustee Act 1978 Part 7

Eacham Abrasive Blasting Pty Ltd v Gundersen & Anor [2014] QLC 38
Fitzgerald v Struber  [2014] QLC 20

Fitzgerald & Anor v Struber & Anor [2009] QLC 0076

Unimin Australia Limited v Freeman [2007] QLC 0076

Wallace & Ors v Bottomer & Ors [2015] QLC 23

Wills v Minerva Coal Pty Ltd [No.2] (1998) 19 QLCR 297

Not applicable

  1. These proceedings concern a referral to the Land Court by the Chief Executive, Department of Natural Resources and Mines (DNRM) pursuant to s 279(5) of the Mineral Resources Act 1989 (MRA) for the determination of compensation in respect of the grant of Mining Lease 100018.  The referral was filed in the Land Court on 31 March 2015.

Background

  1. The applicant, North Queensland Mining Pty Ltd (the miner) seeks the grant of a mining lease located on land described as Lot 14 on SP 250040.  The Mining Lease Area comprises 266 ha within Palmerville Station which is owned by the respondents Stephen Struber and Dianne Wilson-Struber (the landowners). 

  2. The property is located in the Cook Shire Local Government area and is used for grazing purposes. 

  3. The specific Land Court reference and tenure details are set out as follows:  

Court Reference Tenure ID Area Term Lease Purpose
MRA088-15 100018 266 ha 10 years Alluvial mining
  1. On 16 March 2015 a Certificate of Application for Mining Lease 100018 was issued by the Mining Registrar at Mareeba.

Relevant Legislation

  1. Section 279 MRA provides that a mining lease shall not be granted or renewed unless an agreement in relation to compensation has been filed or, in the absence of such an agreement, a determination of compensation has been made by the Land Court. In this matter, no agreement has been lodged with DNRM and the matter has been referred to the Land Court for determination.

  2. Section 281 MRA identifies the matters which must be considered by the Court when determining compensation. In particular, s 281(3)(a) provides that an owner of…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read North Queensland Mining Pty Ltd v Struber and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2016] QLC 4
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the case of North Queensland Mining Pty Ltd v Struber, the primary focus was on determining compensation for a mining lease under the Mineral Resources Act 1989, specifically concerning ML 100018. The dispute arose between North Queensland Mining, the mining lease holder, and the landowners represented by Struber, who were seeking compensation for the use of their land. The Court was tasked with applying relevant legislation and judicial precedents to calculate the appropriate compensation amount.

The legal issues before the Court included interpreting the provisions of the Mineral Resources Act 1989, particularly sections 279 and 281, and assessing the applicability of previous Court decisions such as Eacham Abrasive Blasting Pty Ltd v Gundersen and Fitzgerald v Struber. Additionally, the Court had to consider the role of the Public Trustee Act 1978 in the context of compensation payments to landowners. The main question was how to accurately determine the compensation owed to the landowners based on the established legal framework and precedents.

The Court examined the statutory provisions and relevant case law to arrive at a compensation amount. It considered the specific circumstances of the mining lease and the relevant factors outlined in previous decisions. After thorough analysis, the Court determined that the compensation should be set at $2950.00 per annum. The decision also mandated that the mining company should pay this amount to the Public Trustee of Queensland on behalf of the landowners, starting from the notification of the mining lease issuance and continuing annually thereafter.

The Court's orders specified the compensation amount of $2950.00 per annum and outlined the payment process to the Public Trustee of Queensland. This amount was to be paid by the miner within two months of the notification of the mining lease issuance and then annually on the anniversary of the mining lease renewal. The decision provided clarity on the compensation obligations under the Mineral Resources Act 1989 and reinforced the procedural requirements for such payments.

Orders

Orders of the court

1. In respect of ML 100018 compensation is determined in the total sum of $2950.00 per annum.

2. The miner pay compensation to the Public Trustee of Queensland on behalf of the landowners the amount set out in order 1 within two months from notification of the issue of the mining lease by the Department of Natural Resources and Mines and thereafter on the anniversary of the renewal of the mining lease.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.