North Australian Aboriginal Legal Aid Service v Bradley

Case

[2003] HCATrans 619

No judgment structure available for this case.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry
  Darwin  No D7 of 2002

B e t w e e n -

NORTH AUSTRALIAN ABORIGINAL LEGAL AID SERVICE INC

Applicant

and

HUGH BURTON BRADLEY

First Respondent

NORTHERN TERRITORY OF AUSTRALIA

Second Respondent

Application for special leave to appeal

GLEESON CJ
GUMMOW J
CALLINAN J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

AT SYDNEY ON FRIDAY, 14 MARCH 2003, AT 2.05 PM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

GLEESON CJ:   In this matter the parties have indicated that they do not wish to put oral submissions before the Court.  There is a certificate from the Deputy Registrar that she holds a letter from the solicitors for the first respondent advising that the first respondent submits to any order of the Court save as to costs and that she holds a letter from the solicitors for the second respondent advising that the second respondent does not wish to supplement its written submissions with oral argument and that the applicant has indicated in its summary of argument it does not wish to supplement its written submissions with oral argument.

Having considered the written submissions of the parties, the order of the Court is that special leave to appeal, limited to grounds 1 and 3 in the draft notice of appeal appearing at pages 237 and 238 of the application book, is granted.

We will adjourn to reconstitute.

AT 2.07 PM THE MATTER WAS CONCLUDED

Areas of Law

  • Administrative Law

  • Statutory Interpretation

Legal Concepts

  • Judicial Review

  • Jurisdiction

  • Standing

  • Procedural Fairness

  • Natural Justice

  • Statutory Construction

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0