FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| NORSIC & NORSIC | [2013] FamCA 98 |
| FAMILY LAW - CHILDREN - Best interests |
| APPLICANT: | Ms Norsic |
| RESPONDENT: | Mr Norsic |
| FILE NUMBER: | TVC | 764 | of | 2010 |
| DATE DELIVERED: | 05 February 2013 |
| PLACE DELIVERED: | Adelaide |
| PLACE HEARD: | Townsville |
| JUDGMENT OF: | Tree J |
| HEARING DATE: | 29 January 2013 |
REPRESENTATION
| COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANT: |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE APPLICANT: | Self Represented |
| COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Mr Betts |
| SOLICITOR FOR THE RESPONDENT: | Kelly Legal |
Orders
That the Initiating Application filed 4 December 2012 be dismissed.
That there be no order as to costs.
IT IS NOTED that publication of this judgment by this Court under the pseudonym Norsic & Norsic has been approved by the Chief Justice pursuant to s 121(9)(g) of the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth).
| FAMILY COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT ADELAIDE |
FILE NUMBER: TVC 764 of 2010
| Ms Norsic |
Applicant
And
| Mr Norsic |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
On 19 March 2012 Murphy J, with the consent of the parties, made final parenting orders in relation to the parties’ children. They are R, born in December 2000, and N, born in February 2004, (herein after in these reasons referred as “the children.”) Those orders included orders 46 to 57 which related to overseas travel by the children. Relevant to the matter currently before me are orders 46 and 51 which provided as follows:
(46)that either party shall be permitted to take the children out of Australia for holidays and for other short period of time and, in relation to the parties taking the children out of Australia, the parties agree as follows:
a) the occasions on which either party takes the children out of Australia coincide with normal school holidays in the time specified on the orders above, unless agreed to in writing by both parties;
b) the travelling party will give the other party as much notification as possible of the travelling party’s intention to take the children out of Australia and, in any event, will not give less than three months written notice of such intention.
(51)The parties will not travel with the children to any country with the following warnings from Smartraveller:
a) High degree of caution
b) Reconsider your need to travel
c) Do not travel.
By initiating application, filed 4 December 2012, the mother sought final orders as follows:-
(1)Included in the Consent Order issued by Justice Murphy of this Honourable Court on the following clause: Clause 46(a) That the Respondent Father does not reasonable withhold consent for the children [R] born on … December 2000 and [N] born … 2004 to travel overseas.
(2)The respondent refuses to give consent for the release of the passports, I seek an order of this Honourable Court to release the passports for the purpose of travel outside of Australia for a period of 2 weeks from the 6th April 2013 to the 20th April 2013.
(3)Clause: 46(a) the occasions on which either party takes the children out of Australia are to coincide with normal school holidays,…
Continue reading NORSIC & NORSIC
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- NORSIC & NORSIC [2013] FamCA 98
- Case
- [2013] FamCA 98
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The central legal issue before the court was the determination of the Initiating Application. The court was tasked with deciding whether to uphold or dismiss this application.
Tree J ultimately dismissed the Initiating Application. The court made no order as to costs.
Orders
Orders of the court
1.
That the Initiating Application filed 4 December 2012 be dismissed.
2.
That there be no order as to costs.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.