Nolan v Nolan

Link copied
Case Copied 1 min read

DONNA MAREE NOLAN

v

ANTHONY GERARD NOLAN & ORS

[2016] HCASL 141
B67/2015, B9/2016

  1. Neither application raises any issue of principle suitable for the grant of special leave.  If special leave to appeal were granted, the appeals would have insufficient prospects of success.  Special leave is refused.

  2. Pursuant to r 41.11.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing each application with costs.

V.M. Bell
17 June 2016
S.J. Gageler
CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Nolan v Nolan and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2016] HCASL 141
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Donna Maree Nolan brought an action against Anthony Gerard Nolan and others, seeking to resolve a dispute that was heard in the Supreme Court of South Australia. The primary concern of the case was the distribution of property and financial assets between the parties following the termination of their marriage. The matter ultimately reached the High Court of Australia, where the applicants sought special leave to appeal against the decision of the South Australian Supreme Court.

The legal issues that the court was required to decide included the interpretation of property settlement legislation, specifically the Family Law Act 1975, and the determination of whether the applicants had demonstrated that the appeal had sufficient prospects of success. The court also needed to assess whether the appeal raised any significant principles of law that warranted special leave to appeal.

The High Court found that the applications did not raise any issues of principle suitable for the grant of special leave. The court concluded that the appeals would have insufficient prospects of success, given the findings of the lower court. Consequently, the High Court refused special leave to appeal, and pursuant to the relevant rules, directed the Registrar to prepare an order dismissing each application with costs. This decision effectively brought the matter to a close, with the lower court's decision upheld.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.