Nofofakafeao Polutele

Case

[2017] FWC 1688

24 MARCH 2017

No judgment structure available for this case.

[2017] FWC 1688
FAIR WORK COMMISSION

DECISION


Fair Work Act 2009

s.394—Unfair dismissal

Nofofakafeao Polutele
(U2017/1831)

DEPUTY PRESIDENT CLANCY

MELBOURNE, 24 MARCH 2017

Application for an unfair dismissal remedy.

[1] On 21 February 2017, Mrs Nofofakafeao Polutele made an application for remedy for unfair dismissal under s.394 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act).

[2] Apart from her application appearing to have been lodged outside the 21-day time period for lodgement required under the Act, the application form filed by Mrs Polutele in the Fair Work Commission was incomplete because she did not provide details of the Respondent and the application fee was not paid or a completed waiver application received.

[3] On 22 February 2017, the Commission attempted to contact Mrs Polutele via telephone, however, this was unsuccessful and no voice message was able to be left. On the same date, an email was sent to Mrs Polutele advising the application form was incomplete and further details were required. It was also noted that payment or a completed application for fee waiver was required and that in the absence of advice being received within 14 days, her application may be dismissed.

[4] On 8 March 2017, the Commission again attempted to contact Mrs Polutele via telephone, however this was unsuccessful and a voice message was unable to be left. On the same date, further written correspondence was sent to Mrs Polutele advising that her application remained incomplete and unpaid and in the absence of advice being received within 14 days, her application may be dismissed.

[5] To date, Mrs Polutele has not contacted the Commission or provided the necessary details as requested.

[6] Section 587(1) of the Act provides:

    587 Dismissing applications

      (1) Without limiting when the FWC may dismiss an application, the FWC may dismiss an application if:

        (a) the application is not made in accordance with this Act; or

        (b) the application is frivolous or vexatious; or

        (c) the application has no reasonable prospects of success.

[7] Having regard to the circumstances of this matter, I am satisfied the application was not made in accordance with the Act. As such, the application is dismissed pursuant to s.587(1)(a) of the Act. An Order to this effect will be issued shortly.

DEPUTY PRESIDENT

Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer

<Price code A, PR591281>

Actions
Download as PDF Download as Word Document


Cases Citing This Decision

0

Cases Cited

0

Statutory Material Cited

0