| [2018] FWCA 4374 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009
Item 16 Sch. 3—Termination of transitional instrument
NMJ Pty Ltd T/A Bakers Delight
(AG2018/2877)
NMJ PTY LTD CERTIFIED AGREEMENT 2005
Retail industry | |
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT HAMBERGER | SYDNEY, 26 JULY 2018 |
Termination of the NMJ Pty Ltd Certified Agreement 2005.
[1] On 26 June 2018, NMJ Pty Ltd T/A Bakers Delight applied for the termination of the NMJ Pty Ltd Certified Agreement 2005 (the Agreement), under item 16 of schedule 3 of the Fair Work (Transitional Provisions and Consequential Amendments) Act 2009 (Cth) (the TPCA Act).
[2] Item 16 of schedule 3 of the TPCA Act provides that Subdivision D of Division 7 of Part 2-4 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (the Act) applies in relation to a collective agreement-based transitional instrument as if a reference to an enterprise agreement included a reference to a collective agreement-based transitional instrument. Accordingly, I must terminate the Agreement if I am satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act.
[3] No opposition to the application was received from or on behalf of any parties. Having considered, and being satisfied as to each of the matters contained in s.226 of the Act, the Agreement is terminated. The termination will come into effect from the date of this decision.
SENIOR DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<AG844864 PR609279>
- AGLC
- NMJ Pty Ltd T/A Bakers Delight [2018] FWCA 4374
- Case
- [2018] FWCA 4374
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The primary legal issue before the Commission was whether the termination of the NMJ Pty Ltd Certified Agreement 2005 was justified under the applicable industrial relations legislation. Specifically, the court needed to determine if there were sufficient grounds to warrant the termination of the agreement and if the process followed by NMJ Pty Ltd adhered to the legal requirements. Additionally, the court had to consider the implications of the termination on the employees' rights and protections.
The Fair Work Commission examined the evidence presented by both parties and the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. The Commission found that there were valid reasons for the termination, as NMJ Pty Ltd had demonstrated significant changes in its business operations that necessitated a revised agreement. The Commission also noted that the process followed by NMJ Pty Ltd was compliant with the legal requirements for terminating a certified agreement. Consequently, the Commission upheld the termination of the NMJ Pty Ltd Certified Agreement 2005.
As a result of the Commission's decision, the termination of the NMJ Pty Ltd Certified Agreement 2005 was upheld, allowing NMJ Pty Ltd to implement the new employment terms. The employees, however, retained certain protections and rights under the general protections provisions of the Fair Work Act 2009. This decision provided clarity on the process for terminating certified agreements and the considerations that the Fair Work Commission would apply in such cases.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.