Nillumbik Shire Council v Banks Wood Developments Pty Ltd

Case [1998] FCA 1061


IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA

VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY

 VG 3209  of 1998

BETWEEN:

NILLUMBIK SHIRE COUNCIL
APPLICANT

AND:

BANKS WOOD DEVELOPMENTS PTY LTD
(ACN 056 598 433)
RESPONDENT

JUDGE(S):

WEINBERG J

DATE:

25 AUGUST 1998

PLACE:

MELBOURNE

EX TEMPORE REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

There is before the court an application by notice of motion pursuant to s 482(1) of the Corporations Law in which the applicant, John Charles Freeman, a contributory, director and shareholder of Banks Wood Developments Pty Ltd (“Banks Wood”), a company which is the subject of a winding-up order, seeks to have that order terminated.  The winding-up order was made on 4 August 1998 on the application of the petitioning creditor, Nillumbik Shire Council, upon the basis that Banks Wood had failed to meet a statutory demand in the sum of $3383.75, that amount being the costs of previous legal proceedings.

There is evidence before me which is uncontroverted, and which I accept, that the failure to meet the demand was the result of a genuine though mistaken belief on the part of Banks Wood and its former legal adviser that the debt in question had already been discharged by a previous payment of $12,000 which had been made to the Council.  There is also evidence before me, which I accept, that all of the creditors of Banks Wood consent to the termination of the winding-up, that the liquidator also consents, and that he is in funds to enable the immediate payment of the amount of the statutory demand together with costs, and his own fees.  There is nothing to suggest that Banks Wood is other than wholly solvent, and likely to remain so in the future.  Nor is there any suggestion that Banks Wood has conducted itself in a manner which is “detrimental to commercial immorality” in the sense in which that term is used in this context – see for example Chan v Austgrove Enterprises Pty Ltd (in liq) (1993) 12 ACSR 427 at 430 or that there has been such “sloppiness” on the part of its management that the public interest requires that the winding-up continue.

I am satisfied therefore that, in accordance with the general principles enunciated by Master Lee QC, as his Honour then was, in Re Warbler Pty Ltd (1982) 6 ACLR 526 as approved by Santow J in Dubolo Pty Ltd (trading as Fender Signs) v Codrington Investment Corporation Pty Ltd (1998) 26 ACSR 723 at 724, it is appropriate that I exercise my discretion to terminate the winding-up forthwith, though on appropriate terms. I note the undertaking which is proffered by John Charles Freeman through Mr Sifris of counsel to make payment to the Nillumbik Shire Council of $8171.30 from the funds held in trust by the liquidator Gregory Stuart Andrews, within seven days of this day.

I make the following orders:

  1. Pursuant to s 482(1) of the Corporations Law of Victoria, the winding-up of Banks Wood Development Pty Ltd be terminated with effect from 25 August 1998.

  2. The fees and expenses of Andrews and Staff, fixed in accordance with the current IPAA rate for the State of Victoria (Melbourne District), be paid out of the funds held by Andrews in trust.

I certify that this and the preceding one (1) page is a true copy of the Reasons for Judgment herein of the Honourable Justice Weinberg

Associate:

Dated:             August 1998

Counsel for the Respondent: Mr M Sifris
Solicitor for the Respondent: Haines & Polites
Counsel for the Official Liquidator: Mr P Macnish
Solicitor for the Official Liquidator: Cornwall Stodart
Date of Hearing: 25 August 1998
Date of Judgment: 25 August 1998
Details
AGLC
Nillumbik Shire Council v Banks Wood Developments Pty Ltd [1998] FCA 1061
Case
[1998] FCA 1061
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

Nillumbik Shire Council initiated proceedings against Banks Wood Developments Pty Ltd, a company that had been subject to a winding-up order, seeking to have the order terminated. The winding-up order was made by the Nillumbik Shire Council on 4 August 1998 based on the failure of Banks Wood Developments Pty Ltd to meet a statutory demand of $3383.75, which represented the costs of previous legal proceedings. The applicant, John Charles Freeman, a contributory, director, and shareholder of Banks Wood Developments Pty Ltd, filed a notice of motion seeking the termination of the winding-up order.

The primary legal issue the court had to decide was whether the winding-up order should be terminated in light of the evidence presented by the applicant and the consent of the creditors and the liquidator. The court had to consider whether the failure to meet the statutory demand was due to a genuine mistake and whether there were any grounds for continuing the winding-up order.

The court found that the failure to meet the statutory demand was due to a genuine, albeit mistaken, belief that the debt had already been discharged by a previous payment of $12,000 made to the Nillumbik Shire Council. The court also noted that all creditors, the liquidator, and the applicant consented to the termination of the winding-up order and that the liquidator had sufficient funds to immediately pay the statutory demand, his fees, and costs. The court concluded that there was no evidence suggesting that Banks Wood Developments Pty Ltd was not solvent or that it had acted in a manner detrimental to commercial morality. The court exercised its discretion to terminate the winding-up order forthwith but on appropriate terms, including an undertaking by John Charles Freeman to make payment to the Nillumbik Shire Council within seven days.

The court made orders terminating the winding-up of Banks Wood Developments Pty Ltd with effect from 25 August 1998 and directed that the fees and expenses of the liquidator be paid out of the funds held by the liquidator in trust.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.