NIE (Migration)
[2020] AATA 3100
•25 June 2020
NIE (Migration) [2020] AATA 3100 (25 June 2020)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANT: Honglei NIE
CASE NUMBER: 1834982
HOME AFFAIRS REFERENCE(S): BCC2018/3168499
MEMBER:P. Wood
DATE:25 June 2020
PLACE OF DECISION: Melbourne, Victoria
DECISION:The Tribunal affirms the decision not to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa.
Statement made on 25 June 2020 at 3:04pm
CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa – Subclass 500 (Student) – English language proficiency – decision under review affirmed
LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958, ss 65, 362
Migration Regulations 1994, Schedule 2 cl 500.213STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Home Affairs on 19 November 2018 to refuse to grant the applicant a Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visa under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act).
The applicant applied for the visa on 22 August 2018. At the time of application, Class TU contained two subclasses: Subclass 500 (Student) and Subclass 590 (Student Guardian). The applicant applied for the visa to undertake study in Australia and does not claim to meet the criteria for a Subclass 590 (Student Guardian) visa.
The delegate in this case refused to grant the visa on the basis that the applicant did not satisfy the requirements of cl.500.213 of Schedule 2 to the Migration Regulations 1994 (the Regulations).
On 11 December 2019 the Tribunal wrote to the review applicant advising that it had considered all the material before it relating to the application but could not make a favourable decision on that information alone. The Tribunal invited the review applicant to give evidence and present arguments at a hearing on 28 January 2020 at 12.30pm in person. The invitation stated that if the Applicant did not attend the hearing and an adjournment was not granted, the Tribunal may make a decision on the case without further notice.
On 11 December 2019 the Tribunal was advised by email that the applicant was overseas and would not return to Australia until February 2020. The applicant requested that the hearing be rescheduled until a date after February 2020.
On 21 January 2020 the Tribunal wrote to the applicant advising that it had agreed to postpone the hearing in this matter.
On 15 June 2020 the Tribunal wrote to the review applicant advising that it had considered all the material before it relating to the application but could not make a favourable decision on that information alone. The Tribunal invited the review applicant to give evidence and present arguments at a hearing on 23 June 2020 at 9.00am by telephone (due to Covid-19). The invitation stated that if the Applicant did participate in the hearing and an adjournment was not granted, the Tribunal may make a decision on the case without further notice.
The applicant did not answer the Tribunal’s telephone calls on the day and at the scheduled time of the hearing referred to immediately above.
Having reviewed the Tribunal file, the Tribunal is satisfied that the review applicant was properly invited to a hearing and the invitation has not been returned to sender.
In these circumstances, and pursuant to s.362B of the Act, the Tribunal has decided to make its decision on the review without taking any further action to enable the applicant to appear before it.
CONSIDERATION OF CLAIMS AND EVIDENCE
English language proficiency (cl.500.213)
To meet cl.500.213, the applicant must, if required by the Minister, give evidence that they have a level of English language proficiency that meets the requirements specified in an instrument: cl.500.213(1). IMMI 18/015, which is attached to this decision, specifies the requirements for evidence of English language proficiency and classes of applicants to whom the requirement does not apply.
In this case, the applicant was required by the Minister to provide such evidence. According to the delegate’s decision record, the applicant did not provide the Department with adequate evidence of English language proficiency. Crucially, no further evidence was provided to the Tribunal.
Accordingly, the Tribunal is not satisfied that the applicant meets cl.500.213.
DECISION
The Tribunal affirms the decisions not to grant the applicants Student (Temporary) (Class TU) visas.
P. Wood
Senior MemberAttachment – IMMI 18/015 – English language instrument (extract)
6Primary Criteria
(1)For the purpose of subclause 500.213(1) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations, the following requirements are specified:
(a)the applicant must undertake one of the English language tests specified in Column 1 of Schedule 1;
(b)the applicant must achieve the English language test score specified for that English language test in Column 3 of Schedule 1; and
(c)the applicant must have completed the test within the following period:
(i)if evidence of the test is provided at the time the applicant makes an application for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa - 2 years immediately before the date of the visa application; or
(ii)if evidence of the test is not provided at the time the visa application is made - 2 years immediately before a decision to grant or refuse the visa application is made.
(2)For the purpose of subclause 500.213(2) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations, subclause 500.213(1) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations does not apply to the following classes of applicants:
(a)an applicant who is a citizen of, and who holds a valid passport issued by:
(i)the United Kingdom;
(ii)the United States of America;
(iii)Canada;
(iv)New Zealand; or
(v)the Republic of Ireland; or
(b)an applicant who is enrolled in a principal course of study that is:
(i)registered to be delivered in a language other than English;
(ii)a registered ELICOS course, as defined in regulation 1.03 of the Regulations;
(iii)a registered school course; or
(iv)a registered post-graduate research course; or
(c)an applicant who is a:
(i)Foreign Affairs student;
(ii)Defence Student; or
(iii)Secondary exchange student; or
(d)an applicant, who, in the 2 years before applying for a Subclass 500 (Student) visa, has successfully completed:
(i)the requirements for a Senior Secondary Certificate of Education, in a course that was conducted in Australia and in English; or
(ii)a substantial component of a course leading to a qualification from the Australian Qualifications Framework at the Certificate IV level or higher that was conducted in Australia and in English, while the applicant was holding a student visa; or
(e)an applicant who has successfully completed a minimum of 5 years of study in English undertaken in one or more of the following countries;
(i)Australia;
(ii)Canada;
(iii)New Zealand;
(iv)South Africa;
(v)the Republic of Ireland;
(vi)the United Kingdom;
(vii)the United States of America.
…
Schedule 1 — English language tests and minimum test scores
English language tests
Item
Column 1:
Test nameColumn 2:
Acronym/ also known asColumn 3:
Minimum test score1
International English Language Testing system
IELTS Test
(a) Overall band score 5.5; or
(b) Overall band score 5 if packaged with at least 10 weeks’ ELICOS; or
(c) Overall band score of 4.5 if packaged with at least 20 weeks’ ELICOS.
2
Test of English as a Foreign Language internet-based test
TOEFL iBT
(a) 46; or
(b) 35, if packaged with at least 10 weeks’ ELICOS ; or
(c) 32, if packaged with at least 20 weeks’ ELICOS.
3
Cambridge English: Advanced (CAE) test
Certificate in Advanced English
(a) 162; or
(b) 154, if packaged with at least 10 weeks’ ELICOS; or
(c) 147, if packaged with at least 20 weeks’ ELICOS.
4
Pearson Test of English Academic
PTE
(a) 42; or
(b) 36, if packaged with at least 10 weeks’ ELICOS; or
(c) 30, if packaged with at least 20 weeks’ ELICOS.
5
Occupational English Test
OET
a score of at least B for each test component of the OET.
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Statutory Construction
-
Procedural Fairness
-
Natural Justice
0
0
0