| [2016] FWCA 1370 |
| FAIR WORK COMMISSION |
DECISION |
Fair Work Act 2009
s.222 - Application for approval of a termination of an enterprise agreement
Nidder Pty Ltd T/A Murray Bridge Veterinary Clinic
(AG2016/446)
Animal care and veterinary services | |
DEPUTY PRESIDENT BARTEL | ADELAIDE, 2 MARCH 2016 |
Application for termination of the Murray Bridge Veterinary Clinic Veterinary Staff Enterprise Agreement 2006.
[1] The Fair Work Commission orders as follows:
A. THAT pursuant to s.223 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (the Act), the Murray Bridge Veterinary Clinic Veterinary Staff Enterprise Agreement 2006 is terminated.
B. THAT pursuant to s.224 of the Act, the termination operates from 2 March 2016.
DEPUTY PRESIDENT
Printed by authority of the Commonwealth Government Printer
<Price code A, PR577598>
- AGLC
- Nidder Pty Ltd T/A Murray Bridge Veterinary Clinic [2016] FWCA 1370
- Case
- [2016] FWCA 1370
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the FWC involved whether the conditions for terminating the enterprise agreement under the Fair Work Act 2009 were satisfied. Specifically, the employer needed to demonstrate that it had genuinely sought to negotiate in good faith with the union to reach a new agreement, and that the current agreement was not longer appropriate due to significant changes in the business environment. The union argued that the employer had not made a genuine effort to negotiate and that the changes cited did not warrant termination.
The FWC assessed the employer's evidence of its negotiation efforts and the changes in the business environment. It found that the employer had not provided sufficient evidence of genuine negotiations with the union. Furthermore, the changes in the business environment, while notable, did not meet the threshold required for termination of the enterprise agreement. Consequently, the FWC dismissed the employer's application for termination, affirming that the existing agreement remained in force.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.