FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
| NICKY v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION | [2014] FCCA 2569 |
| Catchwords: CITIZENSHIP – Australian Citizenship Act 1948 – Australian Citizenship Act 2007 – provisos to operation of legislative provisions deeming abandoned child to be an Australian citizen – periods of operation of the Australian Citizenship Acts. |
| Legislation: Australian Citizenship Act 2007, ss.4, 11A, 12, 13, 14, 15, 37 Australian Citizenship Act 1948, ss.5, 10 |
| Applicant: | NICKY |
| Respondent: | MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
| File Number: | SYG 1738 of 2014 |
| Judgment of: | Judge Cameron |
| Hearing date: | 22 September 2014 |
| Date of Last Submission: | 22 October 2014 |
| Delivered at: | Sydney |
| Delivered on: | 12 November 2014 |
REPRESENTATION
| Counsel for the Applicant: | Mr L. Karp |
| Solicitors for the Applicant: | Alim Lim & Partners |
| Counsel for the Respondent: | Mr T. Reilly |
| Solicitors for the Respondent: | Australian Government Solicitor |
ORDERS
The application be dismissed.
| FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA AT SYDNEY |
SYG 1738 of 2014
| NICKY |
Applicant
And
| MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION & BORDER PROTECTION |
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
Introduction
On 1 April 2014 the applicant lodged an application with the Department of Immigration and Border Protection requesting evidence of Australian citizenship. The applicant claimed that he was an Australian citizen by virtue of s.14 of the Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (“2007 Act”) because he had been found abandoned as a child in Australia on 10 February 2002. On 14 April 2014 a delegate of the respondent (“Minister”) refused the applicant’s application on the basis that she was not satisfied that he was an Australian citizen. The applicant then sought an internal review of that decision and on 18 June 2014 a second ministerial delegate also refused to issue the applicant with evidence of Australian citizenship because he was not satisfied that the applicant was an Australian citizen.
On 25 June 2014 the applicant commenced this proceeding seeking relief under the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act1977 (“ADJR Act”) in respect of the second delegate’s decision. He seeks:
a)an order quashing or setting aside the second delegate’s decision;
b)an order that s.14 of the 2007 Act applies to him, or alternatively that s.5(3)(b) of the Australian Citizenship Act 1948 (“1948 Act”), as at 10 February 2002, applied to him; and
c)an order directing the Minister to give him a notice under s.37(2) of the 2007 Act stating that he is an Australian citizen, or alternatively, an order remitting the matter to the Minister to be determined according to law.
For the reasons which follow, the application will be dismissed.
Relevant legislation
Section 5(1) of the ADJR Act relevantly provides:
5 Applications for review of decisions
(1)A person who is aggrieved by a decision to which this Act applies that is made after the commencement of this Act may apply to the Federal Court or the Federal Circuit Court for an order of review in respect of the decision on any one…
Continue reading NICKY v Minister for Immigration
Sign in free to access the full text
- AGLC
- NICKY v Minister for Immigration [2014] FCCA 2569
- Case
- [2014] FCCA 2569
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court was required to determine whether the Minister's decision involved an error of law, specifically in relation to the applicant's claim of Australian citizenship. This involved interpreting the provisions of both the Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth) and the Australian Citizenship Act 1948 (Cth), particularly concerning the acquisition of citizenship by birth, adoption, abandonment, or incorporation of territory, and how citizenship acquired under the 1948 Act was to be treated under the 2007 Act.
The court's reasoning focused on the relevant legislative provisions. It noted that at the time the applicant claimed to have been abandoned, the 1948 Act was in force, which deemed a found abandoned child to have been born in Australia and, depending on the date of birth, to have had certain subsections of section 10 not apply. The court also considered section 37 of the 2007 Act, which allows for applications for evidence of citizenship, and the definition of "Australian citizen" in section 4 of the 2007 Act. Crucially, section 4(2) of the 2007 Act stipulated that if it was necessary to determine citizenship under the 1948 Act, that determination should be made under the 1948 Act as it was in force at the relevant time. The court applied these provisions to the facts of the applicant's case to assess the validity of his citizenship claim.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Decision
Reasons for decision
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.