NICHOLAS WAYNE LOWE
v
THE QUEEN
[2017] HCASL 57
A47/2016
The decision of the Court of Criminal Appeal of the Supreme Court of South Australia is not shown by the application for special leave to appeal to be attended by doubt. The very short extension of time that is sought should be granted but special leave should be refused.
Pursuant to r 41.08.1 of the High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), we direct the Registrar to draw up, sign and seal an order dismissing the application.
S.J. Gageler
8 March 2017P.A. Keane
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Nicholas Wayne Lowe v The Queen and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2017] HCASL 57
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues that the court had to address included whether the application for special leave to appeal was valid and whether the extension of time sought by the applicant was reasonable. The court needed to determine if the application for special leave to appeal was valid and whether the application for an extension of time was justified.
The court found that the application for special leave to appeal did not present a significant doubt and that the extension of time requested by the applicant was minimal. The court determined that the application did not warrant special leave to appeal, but a short extension of time should be granted. The court directed the Registrar to dismiss the application and to draw up, sign, and seal an order to that effect. The decision was made on the basis that the application for special leave to appeal did not present a significant doubt, and the extension of time sought was very short.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.