Nicholas v Canterbury-Bankstown Council (No 2)

Case [2021] NSWLEC 1430


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Nicholas v Canterbury-Bankstown Council (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 1430
Hearing dates: 7 and 8 April 2021
Date of orders: 29 July 2021
Decision date: 29 July 2021
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Chilcott C
Decision:

The Court orders:

(1) The Applicant is granted leave to rely on amended plans.

(2) The appeal is upheld.

(3) The Applicant’s development application DA-499/2019 seeking consent for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a six-storey mixed use development at 610-616 Canterbury Road, Belmore is determined by the grant of consent, subject to the conditions at Annexure A.

(4) The exhibits are returned, except A and 1.

Catchwords:

DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – mixed use development – written request to contravene height of building development standard – request upheld – whether adequate solar access provided to apartments – whether window plenums should be deleted – whether setbacks are acceptable.

Cases Cited:

Nicholas v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2021] NSWLEC 1400

Category:Consequential orders
Parties: Andrew Nicholas (Applicant)
Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:
N Eastman (Applicant)
M Bonanno (Solicitor) (Respondent)

Solicitors:
Mills Oakley (Applicant)
Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2020/182367
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: On 13 July 2021, I handed down my reasons in the Class 1 appeal (Nicholas v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2021] NSWLEC 1400) (the Principal Judgment) and upheld the appeal, subject to conditions.

  2. In the Principal Judgment the Applicant was directed to confirm the status of its BASIX Certificate, tendered as evidence at the hearing, concerning its Proposed Development, and, if required, to secure and provide to the Court an updated BASIX Certificate that can be relied upon in relation to its amended plans.

  3. The Applicant was further directed to provide its response by no later than 3pm on Friday 23 July 2021.

  4. The Applicant has now secured and provided to the Court an updated BASIX Certificate (No. 992320M_02) that can be relied upon in relation to its amended plans and I am able to make final orders to dispose of this appeal.

Orders

  1. The Court orders:

  1. The Applicant is granted leave to rely on amended plans.

  2. The appeal is upheld.

  3. The Applicant’s development application DA-499/2019 seeking consent for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a six-storey mixed use development at 610-616 Canterbury Road, Belmore is determined by the grant of consent, subject to the conditions at Annexure ‘A’.

  4. The exhibits are returned, except for A and 1.

..…………….

M Chilcott

Commissioner of the Court

Annexure A (337260, pdf)

**********

Details
AGLC
Nicholas v Canterbury-Bankstown Council (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 1430
Case
[2021] NSWLEC 1430
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In the matter of Nicholas v Canterbury-Bankstown Council (No 2), the applicant, Nicholas, sought leave to rely on amended plans and to appeal a decision of the Canterbury-Bankstown Council. The dispute involved the applicant’s development application for the demolition of existing structures and the construction of a six-storey mixed-use development at the specified address. The case was heard by the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales.

The legal issues before the court included whether the applicant was entitled to rely on amended plans and whether the appeal against the council’s decision should be upheld. The applicant argued that the amendments to the plans were minor and did not significantly alter the nature of the proposed development. The council, on the other hand, contended that the changes were substantial and required re-evaluation.

The court considered the nature of the amendments and their impact on the development application. It found that the changes were not significant enough to warrant a fresh application and that the applicant was entitled to rely on the amended plans. The court further determined that the council’s decision to refuse the development application was flawed and that the appeal should be upheld. The court granted consent for the proposed development, subject to specific conditions outlined in the order.

Orders

Orders of the court

The Court orders:

(1) The Applicant is granted leave to rely on amended plans.

(2) The appeal is upheld.

(3) The Applicant’s development application DA-499/2019 seeking consent for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a six-storey mixed use development at 610-616 Canterbury Road, Belmore is determined by the grant of consent, subject to the conditions at Annexure A.

(4) The exhibits are returned, except A and 1.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.