Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Nicholas v Canterbury-Bankstown Council (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 1430 Hearing dates: 7 and 8 April 2021 Date of orders: 29 July 2021 Decision date: 29 July 2021 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Chilcott C Decision: The Court orders:
(1) The Applicant is granted leave to rely on amended plans.
(2) The appeal is upheld.
(3) The Applicant’s development application DA-499/2019 seeking consent for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a six-storey mixed use development at 610-616 Canterbury Road, Belmore is determined by the grant of consent, subject to the conditions at Annexure A.
(4) The exhibits are returned, except A and 1.
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION – mixed use development – written request to contravene height of building development standard – request upheld – whether adequate solar access provided to apartments – whether window plenums should be deleted – whether setbacks are acceptable.
Cases Cited: Category: Consequential orders Parties: Andrew Nicholas (Applicant)
Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Respondent)Representation: Counsel:
Solicitors:
N Eastman (Applicant)
M Bonanno (Solicitor) (Respondent)
Mills Oakley (Applicant)
Canterbury-Bankstown Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2020/182367 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: On 13 July 2021, I handed down my reasons in the Class 1 appeal (Nicholas v Canterbury-Bankstown Council [2021] NSWLEC 1400) (the Principal Judgment) and upheld the appeal, subject to conditions.
-
In the Principal Judgment the Applicant was directed to confirm the status of its BASIX Certificate, tendered as evidence at the hearing, concerning its Proposed Development, and, if required, to secure and provide to the Court an updated BASIX Certificate that can be relied upon in relation to its amended plans.
-
The Applicant was further directed to provide its response by no later than 3pm on Friday 23 July 2021.
-
The Applicant has now secured and provided to the Court an updated BASIX Certificate (No. 992320M_02) that can be relied upon in relation to its amended plans and I am able to make final orders to dispose of this appeal.
Orders
-
The Court orders:
The Applicant is granted leave to rely on amended plans.
The appeal is upheld.
The Applicant’s development application DA-499/2019 seeking consent for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a six-storey mixed use development at 610-616 Canterbury Road, Belmore is determined by the grant of consent, subject to the conditions at Annexure ‘A’.
The exhibits are returned, except for A and 1.
..…………….
M Chilcott
Commissioner of the Court
Annexure A (337260, pdf)
**********
- AGLC
- Nicholas v Canterbury-Bankstown Council (No 2) [2021] NSWLEC 1430
- Case
- [2021] NSWLEC 1430
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included whether the applicant was entitled to rely on amended plans and whether the appeal against the council’s decision should be upheld. The applicant argued that the amendments to the plans were minor and did not significantly alter the nature of the proposed development. The council, on the other hand, contended that the changes were substantial and required re-evaluation.
The court considered the nature of the amendments and their impact on the development application. It found that the changes were not significant enough to warrant a fresh application and that the applicant was entitled to rely on the amended plans. The court further determined that the council’s decision to refuse the development application was flawed and that the appeal should be upheld. The court granted consent for the proposed development, subject to specific conditions outlined in the order.
Orders
Orders of the court
The Court orders:
(1) The Applicant is granted leave to rely on amended plans.
(2) The appeal is upheld.
(3) The Applicant’s development application DA-499/2019 seeking consent for the demolition of existing structures and construction of a six-storey mixed use development at 610-616 Canterbury Road, Belmore is determined by the grant of consent, subject to the conditions at Annexure A.
(4) The exhibits are returned, except A and 1.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.