FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Niardone v Clubb (No 2) [2021] FCA 54
File number: WAD 7 of 2021 Judgment of: COLVIN J Date of judgment: 2 February 2021 Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - application by administrators for orders fixing remuneration - where orders made for administration to end on identified date - orders made in terms of proposed orders Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 447A, Part 5.3A, Schedule 2 (Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations)) Division 60 Cases cited: Division: General Division Registry: Western Australia National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations Sub-area: Corporations and Corporate Insolvency Number of paragraphs: 7 Date of last submissions: 29 January 2021 (First Respondent) Date of hearing: Determined on the papers Counsel for the Applicants: Mr AJ Papamatheos Solicitor for the Applicants: Tottle Partners Counsel for the First Respondent: Mr JR Anderson Solicitor for the First Respondent: Allen & Overy Counsel for the Second Respondent: The Second Respondent did not appear Counsel for the Third Respondents: The Third Respondent did not appear ORDERS
WAD 7 of 2021 BETWEEN: PAUL CLEMENT NIARDONE
First Applicant
ADAM STUART DAVEY
Second Applicant
ANDREW PAUL JENSEN
Third Applicant
MATTHEW JOSEPH LAHOOD
Fourth Applicant
AND: DUNCAN EDWARD CLUBB AND ANDREW THOMAS SALLWAY
First Respondent
MCL 105 PTY LTD (ACN 638 967 218)
Second Respondent
THE AGENCY GROUP AUSTRALIA LTD (ACN 118 913 232)
Third Respondent
ORDER MADE BY:
COLVIN J
DATE OF ORDER:
29 JANUARY 2021
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The first respondents be granted leave to file in Court an interlocutory process dated 29 January 2021 and the affidavit of Duncan Edward Clubb sworn on 29 January 2021, subject to the undertaking of the solicitors for the first respondents to pay the applicable filing fees.
2.The interlocutory process be returnable instanter.
3.Pursuant to s 447A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act), Part 5.3A of that Act operate in relation to the third respondent, The Agency Group Australia Ltd (administrators appointed), such that the remuneration of the first respondents, Andrew Thomas Sallway and Duncan Edward Clubb, as external administrators of the third respondent for the period 18 January 2021 up to and including 1 February 2021, be fixed in the amount of $14,323 (plus GST, if applicable) and paid from the assets of the third respondent.
4.Costs of this interlocutory process be costs in the first respondents' external administration of the third respondent, such costs to be paid from the assets of the third respondent.
THE COURT NOTES THAT the third respondent reserves its position as to any application to seek to recover from any other person the costs of the administrators the subject of these orders.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
COLVIN J:
On 18 January 2021, administrators were appointed to The Agency Group Australia Ltd (The Agency) by MCL 105 Pty Ltd (MCL) on the basis…
Keep reading for free
Create a free CaseChat account to read Niardone v Clubb (No 2) and more:
- Read every judgment in full
- Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
- See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
- Download judgments as PDF or Word
One click creates your free account or signs you in.
By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.
- Case
- [2021] FCA 54
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The court examined the relevant statutory provisions, particularly section 447A of the Corporations Act 2001, which governs the remuneration of external administrators. The court noted that the application for the proposed orders was made in the context of the administration nearing its conclusion, and the administrators sought to finalise their remuneration as part of the winding up process. The court found that, given the proposed orders were agreed upon by all parties and aligned with the statutory framework, it was appropriate to grant the requested orders. The court further considered the costs associated with the application, determining that these costs would be borne by the assets of the third respondent.
Ultimately, the court granted the administrators' application, fixing their remuneration at $14,323 plus GST for the specified period and directing that the costs of the application be treated as part of the administration costs, payable from the respondent's assets. The court also noted that the third respondent reserved its right to seek recovery of these costs from other parties involved. This decision ensures that the administrators receive their agreed remuneration for the period of their service, while also clarifying the financial responsibilities associated with their role in the winding up of the company.
Orders
Orders of the court
1. The first respondents be granted leave to file in Court an interlocutory process dated 29 January 2021 and the affidavit of Duncan Edward Clubb sworn on 29 January 2021, subject to the undertaking of the solicitors for the first respondents to pay the applicable filing fees.
2. The interlocutory process be returnable instanter.
3. Pursuant to s 447A of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act), Part 5.3A of that Act operate in relation to the third respondent, The Agency Group Australia Ltd (administrators appointed), such that the remuneration of the first respondents, Andrew Thomas Sallway and Duncan Edward Clubb, as external administrators of the third respondent for the period 18 January 2021 up to and including 1 February 2021, be fixed in the amount of $14,323 (plus GST, if applicable) and paid from the assets of the third respondent.
4. Costs of this interlocutory process be costs in the first respondents' external administration of the third respondent, such costs to be paid from the assets of the third respondent.
THE COURT NOTES THAT the third respondent reserves its position as to any application to seek to recover from any other person the costs of the administrators the subject of these orders.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.