Nhon Hoa Nguyen v Aardwolf Australia Pty Ltd
Case
•
[2017] ATMO 63
•28 June 2017
Details
AGLC
Case
Decision Date
Nhon Hoa Nguyen v Aardwolf Australia Pty Ltd [2017] ATMO 63
[2017] ATMO 63
28 June 2017
CaseChat Overview and Summary
This matter concerned an application by Nhon Hoa Nguyen (the Opponent) to register the trade mark AARDWOLF and a logo, which was opposed by Aardwolf Australia Pty Ltd (the Applicant). The dispute centred on the Applicant's claim to have abandoned its rights in the AARDWOLF trade mark and logo through non-use and intention to abandon. The court was required to determine whether the Applicant had abandoned its rights in the trade mark and logo.
The court considered whether Herdgraph, the original registrant of the AARDWOLF trade mark, had abandoned its rights by ceasing to trade and by its intention to allow Aardwolf Pty Ltd to use the mark. It also examined whether Aardwolf Pty Ltd had abandoned its rights in the mark by ceasing to trade and by the intention of James Corbett to transfer those rights to Aardwolf LLC. The central question was whether the actions and intentions of the relevant parties demonstrated an intention to abandon the trade mark and logo, thereby allowing the Opponent to succeed in their opposition.
The court found that Herdgraph had registered the AARDWOLF trade mark in 2003 and that this registration was used solely by Aardwolf Pty Ltd, not Herdgraph. James Corbett declared that Herdgraph had no interest in using the brand and abandoned its registrations. Aardwolf Pty Ltd subsequently ceased trading in May 2007, and James Corbett intended to abandon any rights Aardwolf Pty Ltd had accrued in the AARDWOLF sign and logo, with the intention for these rights to be adopted by Aardwolf LLC. The court accepted that there was an intention to abandon the rights associated with the AARDWOLF trade mark and logo by both Herdgraph and Aardwolf Pty Ltd.
The court considered whether Herdgraph, the original registrant of the AARDWOLF trade mark, had abandoned its rights by ceasing to trade and by its intention to allow Aardwolf Pty Ltd to use the mark. It also examined whether Aardwolf Pty Ltd had abandoned its rights in the mark by ceasing to trade and by the intention of James Corbett to transfer those rights to Aardwolf LLC. The central question was whether the actions and intentions of the relevant parties demonstrated an intention to abandon the trade mark and logo, thereby allowing the Opponent to succeed in their opposition.
The court found that Herdgraph had registered the AARDWOLF trade mark in 2003 and that this registration was used solely by Aardwolf Pty Ltd, not Herdgraph. James Corbett declared that Herdgraph had no interest in using the brand and abandoned its registrations. Aardwolf Pty Ltd subsequently ceased trading in May 2007, and James Corbett intended to abandon any rights Aardwolf Pty Ltd had accrued in the AARDWOLF sign and logo, with the intention for these rights to be adopted by Aardwolf LLC. The court accepted that there was an intention to abandon the rights associated with the AARDWOLF trade mark and logo by both Herdgraph and Aardwolf Pty Ltd.
Details
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Commercial Law
-
Intellectual Property
-
Contract Law
Legal Concepts
-
Intention
Actions
Download as PDF
Download as Word Document
Most Recent Citation
Aardwolf Industries LLC v Riad Tayeh [2020] NSWSC 299
Cases Citing This Decision
5
Re/Max, LLC v Resimax IP Pty Ltd
[2023] ATMO 15
Aardwolf Industries LLC v Riad Tayeh
[2020] NSWSC 299
Aardwolf Industries LLC v Riad Tayeh
[2020] NSWSC 299
Cases Cited
5
Statutory Material Cited
0
Sartas No 1 Pty Ltd v Koukourou & Partners Pty Ltd
[1994] FCA 936
Sartas No 1 Pty Ltd v Koukourou & Partners Pty Ltd
[1994] FCA 936