Nguyen v Nguyen (No 3)

Link copied
Case Copied 6 min read

Court of Appeal


Supreme Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: Nguyen v Nguyen (No 3) [2022] NSWCA 171
Hearing dates: On the papers
Date of orders: 31 August 2022
Decision date: 31 August 2022
Before: Bell CJ; Meagher JA
Decision:

Notice of Motion of 18 August 2021 dismissed with costs

Catchwords:

CIVIL PROCEDURE – no issue of principle

Legislation Cited:

Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 36.15

Cases Cited:

Nguyen v Nguyen (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 325

Nguyen v Nguyen [2021] NSWCA 161

Nguyen v Nguyen [2021] NSWSC 718

Category:Principal judgment
Parties: Anh Tuan Nguyen (Applicant)
Thi Anh Thuy Nguyen (Respondent)
Representation:

Counsel:

A T Nguyen (Applicant in person)
B Zipser (Respondent)

Solicitors:

Integrity Legal Specialists (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2021/28303
Publication restriction: N/A
 Decision under appeal 
Court or tribunal:
Supreme Court of New South Wales
Jurisdiction:
Equity
Citation:

[2019] NSWSC 131;

[2019] NSWSC 1103

Date of Decision:
22 February 2019;
27 August 2019
Before:
Slattery J
File Number(s):
2015/151521

JUDGMENT

  1. THE COURT: On 16 December 2021, we delivered judgment in Nguyen v Nguyen (No 2) [2021] NSWCA 325. That judgment was in relation to Prayer 3 of a Notice of Motion which had been filed by the Applicant in this Court on 18 August 2021 (the August Notice of Motion) and which sought, inter alia, to set aside our earlier judgment delivered on 3 August 2021: Nguyen v Nguyen [2021] NSWCA 161.

  2. These reasons presuppose familiarity with both of our earlier judgments. For present purposes it suffices to note that, by our judgment of 3 August 2021, we refused an application for an extension of time to appeal from a decision of Slattery J delivered on 22 February 2019: Nguyen v Nguyen [2019] NSWSC 131.

  3. Prayer 3 of the August Notice of Motion was, in effect, an application for an order requiring the Respondent to produce certain documents in aid of other relief sought in the August Notice of Motion. The relief sought in Prayer 3 was refused with costs in our judgment of 16 December 2021. We also ordered that:

“If the Applicant wishes to pursue the balance of the relief sought in the Notice of Motion, the Applicant is to file and serve written submissions of no more than 5 pages by 4pm on 25 January 2022, with the Respondent to file and serve any submissions in reply by 4pm on 2 February 2022.”

The Applicant took up this invitation. There was a slip in the timetable but that can be put to one side for present purposes. It was noted in our judgment of 16 December 2021 at [14] that, if the balance of the relief sought in the August Notice of Motion were to be pursued, it would be dealt with on the papers.

  1. What was left of the August Notice of Motion to be determined, other than Prayer 3, was as follows:

“1  To review and set aside decision 1 & 2 of Court of…

CaseChat AU logo

Keep reading for free

Create a free CaseChat account to read Nguyen v Nguyen (No 3) and more:

  • Read every judgment in full
  • Ask AI and get answers linked to paragraphs
  • See how each paragraph was cited in later cases
  • Download judgments as PDF or Word
Continue with Google

One click creates your free account or signs you in.

By continuing you agree to the Terms and Privacy Policy.

Details
Case
[2022] NSWCA 171
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

In *Nguyen v Nguyen (No 3)*, the parties were Nguyen and Nguyen. The dispute concerned a notice of motion filed on 18 August 2021. The matter was heard by Bell CJ and Meagher JA in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.

The court was required to determine whether to grant the relief sought in the notice of motion filed by the applicant.

The court dismissed the notice of motion. The reasons for this dismissal were not detailed in the provided text, but the outcome indicates that the applicant did not satisfy the court of the merits of their application.

The notice of motion of 18 August 2021 was dismissed with costs.

Orders

Orders of the court

Notice of Motion of 18 August 2021 dismissed with costs

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.