Nguyen & Ors v Nguyen

Case [1989] HCATrans 102


..

. '

'

~

IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA

Office of the Registry

Brisbane No B55 of 1988

B e t w e e n -

HIEN VAN NGUYEN

First Applicant

TRONG RIEU NGUYEN by his next friend

HIEN VAN NGUYEN

Second Applicant

THI KIM LAN NGUYEN by her next friend

HIEN VAN NGUYEN

Third Applicant

and

THANG VAN NGUYEN

Respondent

Application for special leave to

appeal

Nguyen

DEANE J
TOOHEY J

McHUGH J

TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS

FROM BRISBANE BY VIDEO LINK TO CANBERRA

ON FRIDAY, 12 MAY 1989, AT 11.33 AM

Copyright in the High Court of Australia

C2T 32/ 1 /ND 1 12/5/89
MR C.G.S.L. JENSEN:  May it please the Court, I appear

for the applicants. (instructed by Russell and

Hanley)

MR M. GRANT-TAYLOR:  May it please the Court, I appear

for the respondent. (instructed by Heiser Bayly

and Mortensen)

DEANE J:  Yes, Mr Jensen.
MR JENSEN:  May it please the Court, this is an application

to appeal from a judgment of the Full Court of
the Supreme Court of Queensland in a dependency

action. Before Master Weld of the supreme court

the applicant's two children and husband of the
deceased wife and mother recovered a substantial

judgment of the order of $179,000.

DEANE J:  Mr Jensen, we have read the judgments and we
are aware of the facts. Perhaps we might hear
what Mr Grant-Taylor has to say in view of the
comments made about the state of the law in the
Full Court.
MR JENSEN:  Thank you.
MR GRANT-TAYLOR:  Your Honours, I am bound to concede that

this is an application that fairly raises the

criteria prescribed by section 35(a); indeed,

it is possibly a classic instance in which the

criteria are raised.

DEANE J: 

One does get the impression that the members of the Full Court may have been indicating a certain view as to whether it was an appropriate

case.
MR GRANT-TAYLOR:  I cannot be heard in opposition to that

proposition.

DEANE J:  Then is there anything that you - - -

MR GRANT-TAYLOR:

th is stage of matters , Your Honour. I cannot advance my client's case at
DEANE J:  Thank you, Mr Grant-Taylor. Mr Jensen, you may

have your leave. Special leave to appeal is

granted.

AT 11.35 AM THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED SINE DIE

C2T32/2/ND 2 12/5/89
Nguyen
Details
AGLC
Nguyen & Ors v Nguyen [1989] HCATrans 102
Case
[1989] HCATrans 102
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

This matter concerned an application for special leave to appeal to the High Court of Australia from a judgment of the Full Court of the Supreme Court of Queensland. The original proceedings were a dependency action brought by the deceased wife's two children and husband, who had recovered a substantial judgment of approximately $179,000 in the Supreme Court.

The legal issue before the High Court was whether special leave to appeal should be granted. This involved considering whether the case met the criteria prescribed by section 35(a) of the relevant legislation, which typically relates to matters of public importance or where there is a need for the High Court to clarify or develop the law.

The Full Court of the Supreme Court of Queensland had made comments suggesting a view on the appropriateness of the case, which led the respondent's counsel to concede that the application fairly raised the criteria for special leave. Given this concession and the apparent indication from the Full Court, the High Court granted special leave to appeal.

Orders

Orders of the court

Full text does not contain this section.

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.