..
. ' • '
~
IN THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Office of the Registry
Brisbane No B55 of 1988 B e t w e e n -
HIEN VAN NGUYEN
First Applicant
TRONG RIEU NGUYEN by his next friend
HIEN VAN NGUYEN
Second Applicant
THI KIM LAN NGUYEN by her next friend
HIEN VAN NGUYEN
Third Applicant
and
THANG VAN NGUYEN
Respondent
Application for special leave to
appeal
| Nguyen |
DEANE J
TOOHEY J
McHUGH J
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS
FROM BRISBANE BY VIDEO LINK TO CANBERRA
ON FRIDAY, 12 MAY 1989, AT 11.33 AM
Copyright in the High Court of Australia
| C2T 32/ 1 /ND | 1 | 12/5/89 |
| MR C.G.S.L. JENSEN: | May it please the Court, I appear |
for the applicants. (instructed by Russell and
Hanley)
| MR M. GRANT-TAYLOR: | May it please the Court, I appear |
for the respondent. (instructed by Heiser Bayly
and Mortensen)
| DEANE J: | Yes, Mr Jensen. |
| MR JENSEN: | May it please the Court, this is an application |
to appeal from a judgment of the Full Court of
the Supreme Court of Queensland in a dependency
action. Before Master Weld of the supreme court
the applicant's two children and husband of the
deceased wife and mother recovered a substantialjudgment of the order of $179,000.
| DEANE J: | Mr Jensen, we have read the judgments and we are aware of the facts. Perhaps we might hear |
| what Mr Grant-Taylor has to say in view of the | |
| comments made about the state of the law in the | |
| Full Court. | |
| MR JENSEN: | Thank you. |
| MR GRANT-TAYLOR: | Your Honours, I am bound to concede that |
this is an application that fairly raises the
criteria prescribed by section 35(a); indeed,
it is possibly a classic instance in which the
criteria are raised.
DEANE J: | One does get the impression that the members of the Full Court may have been indicating a certain view as to whether it was an appropriate |
| case. | |
| MR GRANT-TAYLOR: | I cannot be heard in opposition to that |
proposition.
| DEANE J: | Then is there anything that you - - - |
MR GRANT-TAYLOR:
th is stage of matters , Your Honour. I cannot advance my client's case at
| DEANE J: | Thank you, Mr Grant-Taylor. | Mr Jensen, you may |
have your leave. Special leave to appeal is
granted.
AT 11.35 AM THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED SINE DIE
| C2T32/2/ND | 2 | 12/5/89 |
| Nguyen |
- AGLC
- Nguyen & Ors v Nguyen [1989] HCATrans 102
- Case
- [1989] HCATrans 102
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issue before the High Court was whether special leave to appeal should be granted. This involved considering whether the case met the criteria prescribed by section 35(a) of the relevant legislation, which typically relates to matters of public importance or where there is a need for the High Court to clarify or develop the law.
The Full Court of the Supreme Court of Queensland had made comments suggesting a view on the appropriateness of the case, which led the respondent's counsel to concede that the application fairly raised the criteria for special leave. Given this concession and the apparent indication from the Full Court, the High Court granted special leave to appeal.
Orders
Orders of the court
Full text does not contain this section.
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.