Nguyen (Migration)
[2020] AATA 440
•21 January 2020
Nguyen (Migration) [2020] AATA 440 (21 January 2020)
DECISION RECORD
DIVISION:Migration & Refugee Division
APPLICANTS: Mr Tan Khanh Nguyen
Ms Thanh Diem Huong Le
Ms Le Thanh Vy Nguyen
Mr Tan Khoi NguyenCASE NUMBER: 1801855
DIBP REFERENCE(S): BCC2017/931743
MEMBER:Andrew McLean Williams
DATE:21 January 2020
PLACE OF DECISION: Brisbane
DECISION:The Tribunal remits the applications for reconsideration, with the direction that the first named applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 186 visa:
·cl.186.223(2) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations
Statement made on 21 January 2020 at 12:47pm
CATCHWORDS
MIGRATION – Employer Nomination (Permanent) (Class EN) visa – Subclass 186 (Employer Nomination Scheme) – nomination refused – decision substituted – nomination approved – decision under review remitted
LEGISLATION
Migration Act 1958 (Cth), s 65
Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth), Schedule 2, cls 186.223, 186.311STATEMENT OF DECISION AND REASONS
APPLICATION FOR REVIEW
This is an application for review of a decision made by a delegate of the Minister for Immigration to refuse to grant the applicants Employer Nomination (Permanent) visas under s.65 of the Migration Act 1958 (the Act). The applicants applied for the visas on 9 March 2017. The delegate refused to grant the visas on 10 January 2018.
The delegate made the decision on the basis that on 23 November 2017 the nomination lodged by HL & JM Trading Pty Ltd, being the nomination referred to in paragraph 186.223(1) in the case of the first-named applicant had been refused by a delegate of the Minister.
On 21 January 2020 the Tribunal determined an application to review the decision described in the preceding paragraph and substituted a decision approving the nomination lodged by HL & JM Trading Pty Ltd. In light of that outcome, the Tribunal is satisfied that the criterion in paragraph 186.223 has been met by the first-named applicant and that the other named applicants meet the requirements of clause 186.311. In these circumstances the Tribunal has concluded that the matter should be remitted for reconsideration.
DECISION
The Tribunal remits the application for reconsideration, with the direction that the first named applicant meets the following criteria for a Subclass 186 visa:
·cl.186.223(2) of Schedule 2 to the Regulations
Andrew McLean Williams
Member
Key Legal Topics
Areas of Law
-
Immigration
-
Administrative Law
Legal Concepts
-
Judicial Review
-
Remedies
-
Procedural Fairness
0
0
0