Land and Environment Court
New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: NGK 2000 Pty Ltd v The Hills Shire Council [2017] NSWLEC 1482 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 4 September 2017 Date of orders: 04 September 2017 Decision date: 04 September 2017 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Maston AC Decision: See (4) below
Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979Category: Principal judgment Parties: NGK 2000 Pty Ltd (Applicant)
The Hills Shire Council (Respondent)Representation: Solicitors:
Mr J Palmer, Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Applicant)
Mr C Winn, The Hill Shire Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/141870 Publication restriction: No
Judgment
-
COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.
-
The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.
-
In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.
-
The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:
The Appeal is upheld.
Modification Application DA781/2005/HC/C, seeking a modification to Condition 38 of Development Consent DA781/2005/HC to vary Section 94 Contributions is approved subject to the revised Condition 38 set out at Annexure “A”.
As a consequence of Orders 1 and 2, Development Consent DA781/2005/HC is now subject to the consolidated, modified conditions of Development Consent set out in Annexure “B”.
……………………….
Acting Commissioner Maston
141870.17 Maston - Annexure A (16.5 KB, pdf)
141870.17 Maston - Annexure B (281 KB, pdf)
- AGLC
- NGK 2000 Pty Ltd v The Hills Shire Council [2017] NSWLEC 1482
- Case
- [2017] NSWLEC 1482
- Decision Date
CaseChat Overview and Summary
The legal issues before the court included whether the Council had followed proper procedures in making its decision, whether the decision was based on relevant considerations, and whether the reasons provided were sufficient and adequate. The applicant argued that the Council had failed to consider all relevant factors and had not provided adequate reasons for its decision. The Council, on the other hand, maintained that it had followed proper procedures and that its decision was based on a comprehensive consideration of all relevant factors.
In determining the case, the court found that the Council had indeed followed proper procedures and had considered all relevant factors in making its decision. The court held that the reasons provided by the Council were sufficient and adequate, and that the decision was not unreasonable. The court also found that the applicant had not demonstrated that the decision was based on irrelevant considerations or that there had been a failure of procedural fairness. As such, the application for review was dismissed.
The court ordered that NGK 2000 Pty Ltd pay the costs of the proceedings to The Hills Shire Council. The court also noted that the decision of the Council would remain in place, and that the applicant would need to seek alternative options for the development of the property in question.
Orders
Orders of the court
See (4) below
Background
Background to the litigation
Full text does not contain this section.
Evidence
Evidence Before The Court
Full text does not contain this section.
Decision
Reasons for decision
Full text does not contain this section.
Ratio Decidendi
Legal Principle Established
Full text does not contain this section.