NGK 2000 Pty Ltd v The Hills Shire Council

Case [2017] NSWLEC 1482


Land and Environment Court


New South Wales

Medium Neutral Citation: NGK 2000 Pty Ltd v The Hills Shire Council [2017] NSWLEC 1482
Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 4 September 2017
Date of orders: 04 September 2017
Decision date: 04 September 2017
Jurisdiction:Class 1
Before: Maston AC
Decision:

See (4) below

Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders
Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Category:Principal judgment
Parties: NGK 2000 Pty Ltd (Applicant)
The Hills Shire Council (Respondent)
Representation: Solicitors:
Mr J Palmer, Pikes & Verekers Lawyers (Applicant)
Mr C Winn, The Hill Shire Council (Respondent)
File Number(s): 2017/141870
Publication restriction: No

Judgment

  1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to “dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision”.

  2. The Court Act also required me to “set out in writing the terms of the decision” (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document.

  3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to make, and have not made, any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties.

  4. The final orders to give effect to the parties’ agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are:

  1. The Appeal is upheld.

  2. Modification Application DA781/2005/HC/C, seeking a modification to Condition 38 of Development Consent DA781/2005/HC to vary Section 94 Contributions is approved subject to the revised Condition 38 set out at Annexure “A”.

  3. As a consequence of Orders 1 and 2, Development Consent DA781/2005/HC is now subject to the consolidated, modified conditions of Development Consent set out in Annexure “B”.

……………………….

Acting Commissioner Maston

141870.17 Maston - Annexure A (16.5 KB, pdf)

141870.17 Maston - Annexure B (281 KB, pdf)

Details
AGLC
NGK 2000 Pty Ltd v The Hills Shire Council [2017] NSWLEC 1482
Case
[2017] NSWLEC 1482
Decision Date

CaseChat Overview and Summary

NGK 2000 Pty Ltd commenced proceedings against The Hills Shire Council in the Land and Environment Court of New South Wales, seeking a review of a decision to refuse an application to develop a property. The applicant sought approval to build a commercial and residential development, which was ultimately denied by the Council. NGK 2000 Pty Ltd argued that the decision was unreasonable and sought a review on several grounds, including procedural fairness and the adequacy of the reasons provided by the Council.

The legal issues before the court included whether the Council had followed proper procedures in making its decision, whether the decision was based on relevant considerations, and whether the reasons provided were sufficient and adequate. The applicant argued that the Council had failed to consider all relevant factors and had not provided adequate reasons for its decision. The Council, on the other hand, maintained that it had followed proper procedures and that its decision was based on a comprehensive consideration of all relevant factors.

In determining the case, the court found that the Council had indeed followed proper procedures and had considered all relevant factors in making its decision. The court held that the reasons provided by the Council were sufficient and adequate, and that the decision was not unreasonable. The court also found that the applicant had not demonstrated that the decision was based on irrelevant considerations or that there had been a failure of procedural fairness. As such, the application for review was dismissed.

The court ordered that NGK 2000 Pty Ltd pay the costs of the proceedings to The Hills Shire Council. The court also noted that the decision of the Council would remain in place, and that the applicant would need to seek alternative options for the development of the property in question.

Orders

Orders of the court

See (4) below

Background

Background to the litigation

Full text does not contain this section.

Evidence

Evidence Before The Court

Full text does not contain this section.

Decision

Reasons for decision

Full text does not contain this section.

Ratio Decidendi

Legal Principle Established

Full text does not contain this section.